Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Obstet Gynecol ; 130 Suppl 1: 24S-28S, 2017 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28937515

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Major vascular injury training may improve clinical skills and reduce patient morbidity during gynecologic laparoscopy; thus, reliable models for simulation should be identified. METHOD: Two laparoscopic major vascular injury simulations using synthetic or live porcine models were constructed. The primary surgeon was given the opportunity to complete both simulations. After obtaining peritoneal access, the surgeon quickly encountered a major vascular injury. Degrading vital signs and estimated blood loss coupled with the replay of a human heartbeat that increased in volume and intensity were provided to heighten tension during the synthetic simulation. EXPERIENCE: Twenty-two gynecologic surgery educators evaluated the simulations. Educators considered the porcine model superior to the synthetic model with regard to tissue handling. The synthetic model simulation was found to be equivalent to the porcine model on how likely the simulation would be able to improve performance in a clinical setting. Educators were more likely to implement the synthetic simulation over the porcine simulation. CONCLUSION: The synthetic model was found to be more feasible and as effective as the porcine model to simulate and teach the initial management steps of major vascular injury at laparoscopy by gynecologic educators.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/educação , Laparoscopia/educação , Modelos Anatômicos , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/cirurgia , Animais , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Suínos , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/etiologia
2.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 29(4): 240-248, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28665807

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Adenomyosis is commonly diagnosed in women of reproductive age. Interest in conservative interventions has grown as more women desire fertility preservation or avoidance of hysterectomy. This review discusses surgical and interventional methods for treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis. The technique, evidence, and utility of each method are described. RECENT FINDINGS: Hysteroscopic ablative techniques are associated with lower morbidity than with hysterectomy but may result in an unacceptable risk of treatment failure. Surgical adenomyomectomy may provide good symptomatic improvement, especially when combined with preoperative gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment. Laparoscopic myometrial coagulation is associated with high rates of future pregnancy complications. Uterine artery ligation has limited value as an isolated approach but, coupled with other techniques, provides adequate therapeutic control. Bilateral uterine artery embolization may improve symptoms, without significantly compromising fertility. Focused ultrasonic surgical methods also show promise in alleviating symptoms without compromising reproductive outcomes. SUMMARY: A multitude of surgical and interventional options are available for young women with symptomatic adenomyosis. These treatment methods have unique associated risks and benefits, and may have varying impacts on long-term symptom control, fertility, and reproductive outcomes.


Assuntos
Adenomiose/cirurgia , Adenomiose/terapia , Eletrocoagulação , Feminino , Fertilidade , Preservação da Fertilidade , Hormônio Liberador de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Humanos , Histerectomia , Laparoscopia , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Gravidez , Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia , Artéria Uterina/patologia , Embolização da Artéria Uterina , Útero/irrigação sanguínea
3.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 217(3): 340.e1-340.e6, 2017 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28549980

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Interest in medical malpractice and areas of medicolegal vulnerability for practicing obstetricians and gynecologists has grown substantially, and many providers report changing surgical practice out of fear of litigation. Furthermore, education on medical malpractice and risk management is lacking for obstetrics and gynecology trainees. Recent obstetric and gynecologic malpractice claims data are lacking. We report on recent trends in malpractice claims for obstetrics and gynecology procedures, and compare these trends to those of other medical specialties. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate recent trends in malpractice claims for obstetrics and gynecology procedures and compare these to other medical specialties. STUDY DESIGN: A search was performed on all medicolegal claims data for obstetrics and gynecology procedures from Jan. 1, 2005, through Dec. 31, 2014, using the Physician Insurers' Association of America data-sharing project, which was created to identify medical professional liability trends. Data from 20 insurance carriers were reviewed based on a search using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes and unique database-specific codes. RESULTS: Of the 10,915 total claims closed from 2005 through 2014, the majority (59.5%) were dropped, withdrawn, or dismissed. The average indemnity of the remaining paid claims (31.1%) was $423,250. The most frequently litigated procedure was operative procedures on the uterus; 27.8% of cases were paid with an average indemnity of $279,384. The procedure associated with the highest proportion of paid claims was vacuum extraction. The average indemnity for paid obstetrics and gynecology procedural claims was 27% higher than that for all medical specialties combined. Obstetrics and gynecology procedural claims had the second highest average indemnity payment and the fifth highest paid-to-closed ratio of all medical specialties. CONCLUSION: Litigation claims for obstetrics and gynecology procedures have higher average indemnity payments and higher paid-to-closed ratios than most other medical specialties. Claims most frequently relate to gynecologic surgery, but obstetric procedures are more expensive. Possible factors may include procedural experience and unique perioperative complications. We encourage efforts addressing procedures, litigation, and quality interventions to improve outcomes, mitigate risk, and potentially lower indemnity payments.


Assuntos
Compensação e Reparação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/legislação & jurisprudência , Imperícia/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Obstétricos/legislação & jurisprudência , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
4.
Gynecol Oncol ; 140(3): 436-42, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26777991

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and primary debulking surgery (PDS) before and after results from a randomized trial were published and showed non-inferiority between NACT and PDS in the management of advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: We evaluated consecutive patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer treated at our institution from 1/1/08-5/1/13, which encompassed 32 months before and 32 months after the randomized trial results were published. We included all newly diagnosed patients with high-grade histology and stage III/IV disease. Associations between the use of NACT and clinical variables over time were evaluated. RESULTS: Our study included 586 patients. Median age was 62 years (range, 30-90); 406 patients (69%) had stage III disease, and 570 (97%) had disease of serous histology. Twenty-six percent (154/586) were treated with NACT and 74% (432/586) with PDS. NACT use increased significantly from 22% (56/256) before 2010 (at which point the results of the randomized trial were published) to 30% (98/330) after 2010 (p=0.037). Although patients who underwent PDS were more likely to experience grade 3/4 surgical complications than those who underwent NACT, those selected for PDS had a median OS of 71.7 months (CI, 59.8-not reached) compared with 42.9 months (CI 37.1-56.3) for those selected for NACT. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-institution analysis, the best survival outcomes were observed in patients who were deemed eligible for PDS followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. Selection criteria for NACT require further definition and should take institutional surgical strategy into account.


Assuntos
Institutos de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Císticas, Mucinosas e Serosas/patologia , Neoplasias Císticas, Mucinosas e Serosas/terapia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/tendências , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/tendências , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Císticas, Mucinosas e Serosas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Seleção de Pacientes , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Taxa de Sobrevida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...