Objective assessment of simulated non-carious cervical lesion by tridimensional digital scanning - An in vitro study.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical assessment of progression of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) is currently based on subjective methods. We hypothesize that 3D digital intraoral scanners (IOS) can provide quantitative outcomes for objective measuring and monitoring of NCCLs. This in vitro study verified the reliability of IOS to monitor dental structure loss of simulated NCCLs, in comparison to a reference bench-top 3D optical profilometer (BTS). METHODS: NCCLs of different severity levels (early, moderate, or severe, n = 150) were simulated in a preceding study. Impressions of the lesions were taken and scanned with both BTS (ProScan; Scantron) and IOS (TRIOS4; 3Shape). Generated 3D images were analyzed for volumetric tooth loss (mm3) by superimposition followed by subtraction analysis. ProForm (Scantron) and WearCompare (Leeds Digital Dentistry) software were used in association to BTS and IOS, respectively. Agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, alpha=0.05) and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: ICC (confidence interval at 95 %) between IOS and BTS for all data combined was 0.962 (0.942-0.973), showing excellent reliability. Subset analyses showed that NCCLs with lower volume loss (early- and moderate-stage lesions) resulted in moderate ICCs, whereas severe lesions showed excellent ICC. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated general good agreement, with narrower limits for early stage-lesions. CONCLUSION: IOS data demonstrated good agreement to BTS, when measuring tooth structure loss in simulated NCCLs, with particularly higher ICC in more severe lesions. Considering the accessibility and ease-of-use, IOS showed to be a good alternative for the objective assessment of NCCLs in vitro. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: 3D intraoral scanners' accessibility and objectivity make them potentially valuable tools for assessing and monitoring NCCLs.

Impact of toothbrush head configuration and dentifrice abrasivity on non-carious cervical lesions in-vitro.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of toothbrush head configuration and dentifrice slurry abrasivity on the development of simulated non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) in vitro. METHODS: Extracted premolars were randomly allocated into 15 groups (n = 16) generated by the association between toothbrush head configuration (flat-trimmed, rippled, cross-angled/multilevel/rubbers added, cross-angled/multilevel/flex head, feathered) and dentifrice slurry abrasivity (low/medium/high). Teeth were mounted on acrylic blocks and had their roots partially covered with acrylic resin, leaving 2-mm root surfaces exposed. Toothbrushing was performed for 35,000 and 65,000 double-strokes. Specimens were analyzed using non-contact profilometry for dental volume loss (mm3) and lesion morphology. Data was analyzed using ANOVA with pairwise comparisons and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: The two-way interaction between toothbrush head configuration and slurry abrasivity was significant (p = 0.02). At 35,000 strokes, the flat-trimmed and cross-angled/multilevel/rubbers added toothbrushes caused the highest loss, when associated to the high-abrasive slurry (p<0.05); whereas cross-angled/multilevel/flex head showed the least loss, when associated to the low-abrasive (p<0.05). At 65,000, more dental loss was observed for all toothbrushes when associated to the high-abrasive slurry, with flat-trimmed causing the highest loss (p < 0.05). Lower dental loss rates were observed for cross-angled/multilevel/flex head associated to the low-abrasive slurry when compared to the other toothbrushes (p < 0.05), except to feathered (p = 0.14) and rippled (p = 0.08). Flat lesions (mean internal angle ± standard-deviation: 146.2°± 16.8) were mainly associated with low-abrasive slurry, while wedge-shaped lesions (85.8°± 18.8) were more frequent with medium- and high-abrasive slurries. CONCLUSION: The development, progression and morphology of simulated NCCLs were modulated by both toothbrush head configuration and dentifrice abrasivity. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Dental professionals should consider both the type of toothbrush and dentifrice abrasivity in the management plan of patients at risk of developing NCCLs.