Unexplained infertility: A French national survey of clinical practices.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to carry out a national survey of French practitioners to evaluate (i) their diagnostic criteria for making a diagnosis of unexplained infertility (UEI) and (ii) their management strategy when facing UEI. MATERIALS AND METHOD: An online questionnaire comprising ten multiple-choice questions was sent by mail to French reproductive practitioners in 80 fertility centres. RESULTS: The response rate was 59.6% (195/327). Post coital testing was always or often prescribed by 14.8% of respondents (n = 36). Chlamydia trachomatis testing was never prescribed by 31.7% (n = 59) of them, 30.2% prescribed a pelvic MRI in cases of UEI and 18.4% (n = 33) always or often performed laparoscopy. For 87.6% (n = 169), advanced maternal age was always or often an indication of first-line IVF, with an average threshold of 37.4 years. For 68.6% (n = 129), diminished AMH was an indication for first-line IVF, with an average AMH threshold of 1.2 ng/ml. With respect to the management of UEI, we did not observe a consensus between the strategies of 2 to 6 intrauterine insemination cycles before IVF or IVF as the first-line treatment. CONCLUSION: There is no consensus in France on what tests should or should not be carried out to conclude UEI, and there is also no consensus on the management of UEI. UEI is one of the top 10 priorities for future infertility research. The diagnostic criteria must be standardized to enable the comparison of studies on this topic as well as to improve the translation of research into clinical practice.

Is it worth it to cryopreserve embryos with blastulation delay at day 5?

This is a retrospective study over a 5-year period. In total, 3139 embryos were individually cryopreserved (Cryotop®) and warmed using the Kitazato vitrification/warming kit. They were classified into three categories based on their expansion degree. Transfer, implantation and pregnancy rates were assessed for each embryo category and compared using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software. In total, 1139 couples enrolled in infertility treatment programme benefitted from embryo vitrification at day 5. After warming, embryos belonging to the three categories showed similar success rates. Although there was a trend towards better outcomes when grade 3 embryos were transferred, the differences did not reach statistical significance: implantation rates (n fetal sac/n embryo transferred) grade 1: 21.9%, grade 2: 22.7% and grade 3: 30.3% (=0.19). Pregnancy rate (n clinical pregnancy/n transfer) (21.9%, 22.7%, 30.3%, respectively; P=0.11). Miscarriage rate was not statistically different in the three categories (14.5%, 20.4%, 20%, respectively, P=0.51). Our overall results show that it is worth vitrifying slow kinetics embryos as they provide a non-negligible chance to give rise to a pregnancy.