Eficacia del corticoide intratimpánico como tratamiento de rescate en sordera súbita neurosensorial idiopática / Efficacy of intratympanic corticosteroid as a salvage treatment in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Introducción: La hipoacusia súbita neurosensorial idiopática (SSI) es la pérdida de al menos 30 dB de causa desconocida. Dado que la recuperación auditiva en SSI es variable, el rescate con corticoides intratimpánicos (CIT) podría contribuir a la recuperación auditiva. Nuestro objetivo es analizar la respuesta auditiva tras CIT como rescate, en ausencia de recuperación completa tras tratamiento sistémico. Material y método: Realizamos un estudio observacional de cohortes históricas de los 125 casos detectados de SSI entre 2006 y 2014. De ellos, 16 obtuvieron a la semana recuperación completa según los criterios de Siegel. Los 109 casos restantes se analizaron en dos grupos: el que recibió CIT (grupo de tratamiento) y otro que no lo recibió (grupo control). Evaluamos la recuperación auditiva a los 6 meses y a 2 años. Resultados: La media de audición en la audiometría al diagnóstico no tenía diferencias significativas entre los grupos. Al séptimo día del tratamiento sistémico, el PTA obtenido fue de 53,13 dB en el grupo control y de 66,11 dB en el grupo de estudio (p < 0,01). Tras 6 meses, la ganancia en decibelios obtenida tras el tratamiento con CIT de rescate fue de 10,84 dB, y en el grupo control, de 1,13 dB (p < 0,0001). Tras CIT, solo se consiguió la recuperación completa en 10 pacientes. Ningún paciente del grupo control obtuvo recuperación completa. Conclusión: Encontramos que el tratamiento de rescate con CIT en la SSI favorece la mejoría auditiva tras la ausencia de recuperación después de un tratamiento sistémico. Sin embargo, en la mayoría de los pacientes no consigue obtener una recuperación completa según criterios de Siegel

Introduction: Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) is defined as an abrupt hearing loss of at least 30dB of unknown cause. The hearing response obtained after intratympanic steroid injection as a salvage treatment after a prior failure of initial systemic steroid treatment was analysed. Material and method: An observational study was performed on 125 cases of ISSHL who were diagnosed from 2006 to 2014. Sixteen achieved complete recovery after one week according to Siegel's criteria. The remaining 109 cases were analysed in two groups: one that received intratympanic corticosteroid salvage therapy (treatment group) and one that did not (control group). The recovery was analysed after 6 months and 2 years of follow-up. Results: The difference between each group at baseline were not statistically significant. After systemic treatment for 7 days, PTA in the control group was 53.13 dB and 66.11 dB in the treatment group (P < .01). After 6 months, the mean PTA improvement was 10.84dB in the treatment group, and 1.13 dB in the control group, a significant difference (P < .0001). Only 10 cases achieved full hearing recovery after intratympanic corticosteroid salvage therapy, none of the patients did so in the control group. Conclusion: Intratympanic corticosteroid rescue for ISSHL acheived hearing improvement for the cases with failure of initial systemic corticosteroid treatment. However, this treatment did not provide complete hearing recovery according to Siegel's criteria in most cases

Intratympanic steroids for combined treatment of idiopathic sudden hearing loss: when is it too late?

Background: Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) requires early treatment. Objective: To describe our experience on intratympanic steroid treatment (ITS) of ISSNHL analyzing the delay to start therapy as prognostic factor. Material and methods: We perform a retrospective study on ISSNHL treated with systemic steroids without full recovery on PTA (pure tone average) according to Siegel criteria. They were divided into two different groups: one group that additionally received ITS as combined therapy (treatment group), and another without it (control group). We analyzed the hearing recovery at 6 months and 2 years, and the influence of the delay to start ITS in the recovery. Results: After ITS was added, further complete recovery was achieved in 10 patients of the treatment group. After 6 months, PTA improvement in the treatment group was 10.84 dB, compared to 1.13 dB in the control group (p<.0001). Nevertheless, patients starting such combination of oral steroids and ITS within 8 days of diagnosis had an additional gain of 15 dB in the first 6 months, that increased to 19.17 dB after 24 months (p<.022). Conclusions: When ITS was added within the first 8 days, a significantly better and more stable response was obtained.

Efficacy of intratympanic corticosteroid as a salvage treatment in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. / Eficacia del corticoide intratimpánico como tratamiento de rescate en sordera súbita neurosensorial idiopática.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) is defined as an abrupt hearing loss of at least 30dB of unknown cause. The hearing response obtained after intratympanic steroid injection as a salvage treatment after a prior failure of initial systemic steroid treatment was analysed. MATERIAL AND METHOD: An observational study was performed on 125 cases of ISSHL who were diagnosed from 2006 to 2014. Sixteen achieved complete recovery after one week according to Siegel's criteria. The remaining 109 cases were analysed in two groups: one that received intratympanic corticosteroid salvage therapy (treatment group) and one that did not (control group). The recovery was analysed after 6 months and 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: The difference between each group at baseline were not statistically significant. After systemic treatment for 7 days, PTA in the control group was 53.13dB and 66.11dB in the treatment group (P<.01). After 6 months, the mean PTA improvement was 10.84dB in the treatment group, and 1.13dB in the control group, a significant difference (P<.0001). Only 10 cases achieved full hearing recovery after intratympanic corticosteroid salvage therapy, none of the patients did so in the control group. CONCLUSION: Intratympanic corticosteroid rescue for ISSHL acheived hearing improvement for the cases with failure of initial systemic corticosteroid treatment. However, this treatment did not provide complete hearing recovery according to Siegel's criteria in most cases.

Amplitude of Glottal Mucosal Wave After Vocal Fold Microflap With or Without Fibrin Glue.

INTRODUCTION: The vocal fold microflap technique is the ideal to remove benign vocal fold pathology. Our objective is to compare the amplitudes of the mucosal wave before and after the closure of microflap defect with fibrin glue, and when microflap is left to heal by secondary intention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study is a retrospective series, including 32 patients treated by intracordal phonosurgery, with closure of the microflap either with fibrin glue or by healing by secondary intention. They all had both preoperative and 6-month postoperative track records to allow voice analysis, a subjective Voice Handicap Index 10 (VHI-10), and a good image quality strobe. RESULTS: After selecting the patients was found that the mean overall preoperative VHI-10 was 26.6, and improved up to 10.5 after surgery, a statistical differences (P = 0.03). When comparing both groups, with or without fibrin glue, fibrin glue did not improved results in VHI-10. On the contrary, there was a significant difference in the improvement of the open glottal phase after surgery (P = 0.03), showing a much higher improvement when fibrin glue was used. CONCLUSIONS: The use of fibrin glue after a vocal fold microflap for advanced pathology, such as sulcus vocalis in pocket, vergeture, or vocal fold scar, increases the amplitude of the mucosal wave of the vocal folds, but does not improve the VHI-10 results in our cohort of female patients. So far, patient-reported outcome shows that healing by secondary intention continues to provide excellent voice results.

Sordera súbita: encuesta nacional en España / Sudden hearing loss: National survey in Spain

Introducción: El objetivo de nuestro estudio es identificar las actitudes diagnósticas y terapéuticas que se llevan a cabo en los diferentes servicios de otorrinolaringología (tanto del ámbito privado como público) en España con respecto a la sordera súbita. Esto permitirá establecer una base que ayude a generar un nuevo consenso a nivel nacional, unificando criterios para el tratamiento, diagnóstico y seguimiento de esta patología. Material y métodos: Se realizó una encuesta anónima por Internet, dirigida a otorrinolaringólogos españoles a nivel nacional (n = 2.029 especialistas afiliados a la SEORL), recopilando en 33 preguntas diferentes aspectos en relación a los criterios diagnósticos, pruebas complementarias, pautas de tratamiento y factores pronósticos en la sordera súbita, según los diferentes protocolos instaurados y experiencia de los participantes en la encuesta. Resultados: Participaron 293 otorrinolaringólogos españoles de forma anónima (14% del total). Respecto a criterios diagnósticos, destaca el requerimiento de confirmar una hipoacusia neurosensorial (91,1%), de inicio en menos de tres días (75%) y afectación de tres frecuencias consecutivas (76,4%). Más de la mitad de los participantes solicitan resonancia magnética de CAI/APC (68,7%), y el 88,2% utiliza contraste con gadolinio en esta prueba. El factor pronóstico que se consideró con mayor frecuencia en la encuesta fue la demora hasta inicio del tratamiento con un 84,8%. Respecto al tratamiento empleado en casos primarios, la gran mayoría de los encuestados (99,7%) coinciden en la administración de corticoides. La vía oral es la más utilizada (66%), seguida de la administración intravenosa (29,6%), e intratimpánica (1,4%). El 92% no han tenido complicaciones mayores con el tratamiento corticoide sistémico. La vía intratimpánica es empleada en un 70% como rescate en fracasos. Conclusiones: En España, existe actualmente una importante disparidad en el uso de los medios diagnósticos en la sordera súbita y un mayor acuerdo en el uso de corticoides como su tratamiento. Sería necesario implementar medidas que permitan un mejor abordaje, homogéneo y consensuado de esta patología (AU)

Introduction: The objective of our study was to identify the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in the different ENT Departments of Spain with respect to sudden deafness. We wanted to establish a basis to help to create a new nation-wide consensus, unifying treatment, diagnostic and follow-up criteria for this disease. Methods: We carried out an anonymous Internet survey, addressing Spanish ENT doctors nation-wide (n = 2,029), gathering in 33 questions different aspects about diagnostic criteria, additional tests, treatment procedures and prognostic factors in sudden deafness, according to the different protocols and experience of the participants in the survey. Results: A total of 293 Spanish ENT doctors (14%) took part anonymously. In relation to diagnostic criteria, is the most noteworthy was the requisite of a confirmed neurosensorial loss (91.1%) followed by "initiated in less than three days" (75%) and 3 consecutive frequencies affected (76.4%). More than half of the participants requested an MRI of the IAC/CPA (68.7%) and 88.2% used gadolinium in this test. The prognostic factor most frequently considered was delay in commencement of treatment onset (84.8%). As far as treatment of primary cases, most of the responders agreed on the use of corticosteroids (99.7%). Oral administration was the most widely used (66%), followed by intravenous (29.6%) and intratympanic (1.4%) administration. Ninety-two percent had not had any major complications with systemic steroids. Intratympanic treatments were used by 70% of responders for rescue in failure. Conclusions: In Spain there is currently a significant disparity of concepts regarding the diagnosis of sudden deafness, and more agreement as to using steroids as their treatment. This highlights the need to implement measures to promote a better approach, which would be homogeneous and consensual, to this condition (AU)

Sudden hearing loss: National survey in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of our study was to identify the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in the different ENT Departments of Spain with respect to sudden deafness. We wanted to establish a basis to help to create a new nation-wide consensus, unifying treatment, diagnostic and follow-up criteria for this disease. METHODS: We carried out an anonymous Internet survey, addressing Spanish ENT doctors nation-wide (n=2,029), gathering in 33 questions different aspects about diagnostic criteria, additional tests, treatment procedures and prognostic factors in sudden deafness, according to the different protocols and experience of the participants in the survey. RESULTS: A total of 293 Spanish ENT doctors (14%) took part anonymously. In relation to diagnostic criteria, is the most noteworthy was the requisite of a confirmed neurosensorial loss (91.1%) followed by "initiated in less than three days" (75%) and 3 consecutive frequencies affected (76.4%). More than half of the participants requested an MRI of the IAC/CPA (68.7%) and 88.2% used gadolinium in this test. The prognostic factor most frequently considered was delay in commencement of treatment onset (84.8%). As far as treatment of primary cases, most of the responders agreed on the use of corticosteroids (99.7%). Oral administration was the most widely used (66%), followed by intravenous (29.6%) and intratympanic (1.4%) administration. Ninety-two percent had not had any major complications with systemic steroids. Intratympanic treatments were used by 70% of responders for rescue in failure. CONCLUSIONS: In Spain there is currently a significant disparity of concepts regarding the diagnosis of sudden deafness, and more agreement as to using steroids as their treatment. This highlights the need to implement measures to promote a better approach, which would be homogeneous and consensual, to this condition.

The role of partial parotidectomy for benign parotid tumors: A case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results and complications after partial parotidectomy vs superficial parotidectomy, as primary treatment of benign parotid tumors. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: University hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A case-control study is presented on parotidectomy, comparing a group of 25 patients treated by partial parotidectomy vs a similar group of 25 patients treated by superficial parotidectomy. All patients had primary benign parotid tumors, were matched by sex and age, and had a minimum follow-up of 4 years. Independent variables included sex, age, medical history, intra-operative variables (surgical time, estimated blood loss, type of drainage, use of collagen), fine-needle aspiration cytology, computed tomography findings, and final histopathological diagnosis. Outcome measures were early and late complications, such as facial nerve paralysis, seroma, sialocele, Frey syndrome, and recurrence. RESULTS: Partial parotidectomy resulted in less early and late complications than superficial parotidectomy, with similar recurrence rates. Temporal facial paresis was found in 4% of partial surgeries, vs 12% of superficial parotidectomies, a significant difference. Three months after surgery, only one patient has a persistent marginal nerve paresis. In contrast, sialocele was more common after partial parotidectomy (28% vs 16%), a significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: Partial parotidectomy achieves less early and late complications than superficial parotidectomy, with similar recurrence rates.