[Proposal for an anonymous reporting code organ trafficking: how transplant professionals can play a role in preventing this trafficking]. / Voorstel voor een anoniem meldpunt orgaanhandel.

Patients travel worldwide to undergo kidney transplantations. Care providers in the Netherlands encounter these patients, both before and after the transplantation. We present the results of a survey that was distributed among Dutch transplant professionals about their experiences with patients who have undergone a kidney transplantation abroad. We propose that care providers should report illegal transplantations. Of the 241 surveyed professionals, 100 treated patients who travelled to a country outside the European Union for a kidney transplant. Thirty-one professionals were certain that patients purchased their kidney, and sixty-five had suspicions that it had been purchased. The majority reported a conflict of duties. Professionals can help prevent organ purchase by detecting and disclosing information about organ trafficking networks. The aim of reporting is two-fold. Firstly, such disclosure can lead to increased knowledge and information about organ trafficking. Secondly, it can support the police and law enforcement agencies to investigate if networks are involved in facilitation of these transplantations. In this manner, those who facilitate organ trafficking can be prosecuted and exploitation of donors can be prevented.

On Patients Who Purchase Organ Transplants Abroad.

The international transplant community portrays organ trade as a growing and serious crime involving large numbers of traveling patients who purchase organs. We present a systematic review about the published number of patients who purchased organs. With this information, we discuss whether the scientific literature reflects a substantial practice of organ purchase. Between 2000 and 2015, 86 studies were published. Seventy-six of these presented patients who traveled and 42 stated that the transplants were commercial. Only 11 studies reported that patients paid, and eight described to what or whom patients paid. In total, during a period of 42 years, 6002 patients have been reported to travel for transplantation. Of these, only 1238 were reported to have paid for their transplants. An additional unknown number of patients paid for their transplants in their native countries. We conclude that the scientific literature does not reflect a large number of patients buying organs. Organ purchases were more often assumed than determined. A reporting code for transplant professionals to report organ trafficking networks is a potential strategy to collect and quantify cases.

Reporting Organ Trafficking Networks: A Survey-Based Plea to Breach the Secrecy Oath.

Patients travel worldwide to purchase kidneys. Transplant professionals can play a role in identifying kidney purchase. However, due to the tension between their rights and obligations, a lack of understanding and knowledge exists on how to prevent and report purchase. We present the results of a national survey that describes transplant professionals' experiences, attitudes, behaviors, conflicts of duties, legal knowledge and needs for guidelines toward patients who purchase kidneys abroad. Second, we clarify professionals' rights and obligations regarding organ purchase and propose actions that they can take to report purchase. Of the 100/241 (42%) professionals who treated patients who traveled to a country outside the European Union for a kidney transplant, 31 (31%) were certain that patients purchased kidneys. Sixty-five (65%) had suspicions that patients had bought kidneys. The majority reported a conflict of duties. Eighty percent reported a need for guidelines. Professionals can help prevent organ purchase by disclosing information about organ trafficking networks to law enforcement. Such disclosure can support the investigation and prosecution of networks. We offer key components for guidelines on disclosure of these networks.

A criminological perspective: why prohibition of organ trade is not effective and how the Declaration of Istanbul can move forward.

The Declaration of Istanbul is the first document that has been established by the international transplant community that defines and prohibits transplant commercialism and organ trafficking. Its Custodian Group has successfully led various countries to implement legislation against trafficking and commercialism. The question arises, however, whether efforts to prohibit organ trade are realistic and effective. The Declaration differentiates trafficking from commercialism, yet it does not mention how both acts should be approached by policy. Policies that address transplant commercialism work differently from policies that tackle organ trafficking. There is considerable room for improvement in the current prohibitive approach to commercialism and organ trafficking. The Custodian Group and World Health Organization (WHO) should address commercialism by encouraging the expansion of living donation in the same manner as they encourage deceased donation. Furthermore, the Custodian Group and the WHO can improve their strategy to combat organ trafficking by raising awareness for enforcement. To achieve a consistent and effective prohibition of trafficking, legislation and law enforcement must go hand in hand. Ideally, this can best be achieved by close collaboration between the medical field and (international) criminal justice agencies.