Prevalence of Hypoglycemia and Its Determinants Among Diabetes Patients on Insulin Treatment at Tepi General Hospital, Southwest, Ethiopia.

Background: Hypoglycemia occurs when the blood sugar levels are too low. In severe cases, hypoglycemia may give to seizures, coma, and sometimes death. The prevalence of hypoglycemia among patients with diabetes is likely underreported and undocumented. Methods: An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 336 study participants at the Tepi General Hospital in Southwest Ethiopia. A binary logistic regression model was used to determine the association between the prevalence of hypoglycemia and the factors associated with it. After a bivariate analysis, variables with a p value of < 0.25 were selected as a candidate for multivariable analysis. An odds ratio with a 95% CI was considered to indicate a significant association. Results: With 95% CI (52.48-62.25) the prevalence of hypoglycemia was determined as 57.44%. Nearly 11% of the patients encounter severe hypoglycemia. Female patients had three times higher odds of experiencing hypoglycemia (aOR=3, 95% CI: 2.10, 6.39). Those with no formal education had 1.5 times higher odds of experiencing hypoglycemia (aOR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.08, 5.45). Patients with type 1 diabetes were 3.4 times more likely to experience hypoglycemia (aOR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.87, 7.50). Those who had been diagnosed before 10 years (aOR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.02, 3.21) were more likely to have hypoglycemia. Furthermore, patients who consumed alcohol were 3.0 times more likely to have a history of hypoglycemia (aOR = 3.0, 95% CI: 2.03, 6.43). Conclusion: The magnitude of hypoglycemia among patients with diabetes is determined to be considerable with more than half of the participants encountered hypoglycemia. There is a strong relationship between the occurrence of hypoglycemia and sex, type of diabetes, time since diagnosis, alcohol status, and education status. Therefore, all concerned parties must pay close attention to lessen the prevalence of hypoglycemia and address the problems based on the primary contributing factors.

Willingness to Embrace COVID-19 Vaccination Amongst Residents in a Low-Income Nation: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study on a Limited Cohort.

The global pandemic had a significant impact on countries around the world, both politically and socioeconomically. It is crucial that swift decisions and actions need to be taken to prevent negative outcomes. The development of vaccines has emerged as a potential necessity for countries worldwide. Ethiopia began vaccinating health professionals and high-risk individuals in March 2021, according to a report from the World Health Organization citing the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health. This study aimed to assess the determinants of willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine among Debre Markos city administration residents. A community-based cross-sectional study design was employed to recruit 845 individuals as a sample. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used as statistical analysis techniques. Among the total 845 samples, the overall response rate was 98.34%. Two hundred forty-two participants showed their willingness to receive vaccines. Age (AOR = 2.56; 95%CI = [1.87-3.23]), sex (Female) (AOR = 3.45; 95% CI = [2.07-5.26]), having children (AOR = 1.21; 95% CI = [1.02-1.90]), and Chronic Disease (AOR = 2.98; 95% CI = [1.67-3.50]) were significantly and positively associated with willingness to receive COVID 19 vaccines at 95% CI. Although most of the participants were aware of the possibility of COVID-19 to cause fever; and its transmission, only a small percentage of the total participants showed their willingness to receive the vaccine if it was available to them. Elderly and individuals with chronic diseases need to get a priority of taking those vaccinations.

Self-care practice and glycemic Control among type 2 diabetes patients on follow up in a developing country: a prospective observational study.

Purpose: The main goal of managing diabetes is to achieve glycemic control. However, the glycemic level of most diabetic patients is shown to be poorly controlled mainly due to poor adherence to self-care practices. This study aims to assess the level of self-care practice and glycemic control among type 2 diabetes patients on follow up in a resource limited country. Methods: A four-month prospective observational study was conducted among type 2 diabetes patients from February 1 to May 30, 2021. Data was collected using a data abstraction checklist and structured questionnaire. The data was entered into Epidata version 4.4.6 and analyzed with SPSS version 26. Glycemic control and its predictors were determined using binary logistic regression. P-value less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: A total of 138 patients were included in the study. Nearly three-fourths (74.6%) of patients had poor glycemic control and the majority of patients had poor self-care practice. 78.3%, 98.6%, 96.4%, and 55.8% of patients had poor adherence to diet, exercise, self-monitoring of blood glucose, and medications respectively. Importantly, 85(79%), 102(75%), 99(74.4%), and 65(84.4%) patients with poor adherence to diet, physical activity, self-monitoring of blood glucose, and antidiabetic medications had poor glycemic control. On multivariate logistic regression, BMI (AOR 4.1, CI:1.20-14.11, p = 0.024) and drug adherence (AOR 3.08, CI:1.22-7.08, p = 0.017) were factors associated with poor glycemic control. Conclusions: A higher proportion of patients had low-level of self-care practice and poor glycemic control. This highlights the need to improve patients' awareness about the importance of self-care practice to maintain good glycemic control and prevent adverse outcomes associated with the disease. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-022-00995-4.

Multidisciplinary Effort and Integrative Preparedness: A Lesson for the Foreseen Multivariate COVID-19 Pandemic Flare-Up.

It has been a year and a half since the world suffered the horrific COVID-19 pandemic which has still continued becoming a prominent headache for the whole world. Recently, we are facing the second and third wave of multivariate outbreaks with great intensity of transmission which renders huge disaster. Presently, new strains of the virus are emerging that are predicted to be resistant for the current vaccines and other management approaches. It needs collaborative and coordinated role at professional, facility, regional, and global levels to ameliorate the pandemic by monitoring the existing and emerging variants. This review addressed the multidisciplinary roles in patient screening and detection, emergency management, moderate and critical care, vaccination, complication prevention, comorbidity management, psychological therapy, and digital health care. The inevitable roles of academicians, researchers, private health sectors, policy makers, regulatory bodies, and partners are also discussed.

A Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Compared to Warfarin for Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Treatment in Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are known by the collective name venous thromboembolism. Deep vein thrombosis is the third most common cardiovascular disorder in the world. The disease is also prevalent in Africa including Ethiopia, besides lack of studies that show epidemiology of the disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin-based therapy for deep vein thrombosis patients in Ethiopia. METHODS: A Markov model was built to compare cost and effectiveness of rivaroxaban 15mg bid for three weeks and 20mg per day for the rest to adjusted dose of warfarin for one year using a restricted societal perspective. The population in this analysis was a hypothetical cohort of deep vein thrombosis patients 40 years old with no contraindication, comorbidity and concomitant therapy. The patients were followed yearly for 24 years up to their average life expectancy. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban therapy resulted in higher quality adjusted life years with a value of 16.78, while warfarin-based treatment resulted in 16.34 quality adjusted life years. Total lifetime costs were $988.58 for rivaroxaban and $932.92 for unfractionated heparin/warfarin. Therefore, rivaroxaban resulted in a gain of 0.443 quality adjusted life years at an additional cost of $55.661. The incremental cost effectiveness ratios for rivaroxaban compared with warfarin was $125.683 per quality adjusted life year saved which is less than willingness to pay threshold of $783 per quality adjusted life year saved. Warfarin resulted in a net monetary benefit of $11,859.72, while that of rivaroxaban is $12,150.82, meaning rivaroxaban is cost-effective. Sensitivity analyses found that the model was sensitive to utility of no deep vein thrombosis, effectiveness of rivaroxaban and cost of rivaroxaban respectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed that rivaroxaban is a cost effective alternative and substituting rivaroxaban for warfarin is acceptable to willingness to pay threshold.

Could Nanotechnology Help to End the Fight Against COVID-19? Review of Current Findings, Challenges and Future Perspectives.

A serious viral infectious disease was introduced to the globe by the end of 2019 that was seen primarily from China, but spread worldwide in a few months to be a pandemic. Since then, accurate prevention, early detection, and effective treatment strategies are not yet outlined. There is no approved drug to counter its worldwide transmission. However, integration of nanostructured delivery systems with the current management strategies has promised a pronounced opportunity to tackle the pandemic. This review addressed the various promising nanotechnology-based approaches for the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of the pandemic. The pharmaceutical, pharmacoeconomic, and regulatory aspects of these systems with currently achieved or predicted beneficial outcomes, challenges, and future perspectives are also highlighted.