Patient Utilization of Weekend/Evening Appointments for Screening Mammography: An 8-Year Observational Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the patient population utilizing weekend/evening appointments for screening mammography versus standard appointment times across four outpatient facilities in our academic health system. METHODS: In this institutional review board approved retrospective cohort study, there were 203,101 screening mammograms from 67,323 patients who had a screening mammogram performed at outpatient centers at a multisite academic institution from 1/1/2015 to 12/31/2022. Screening appointments were defined as "standard appointment time" (between 8am and 5pm on Monday through Friday) or "weekend/evening appointment time" (scheduled after 5pm on Monday through Friday or at any time on a Saturday or Sunday). Associations between appointment group and patient characteristics were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Most screening mammograms (n=185,436, 91.3%) were performed at standard times. The remainder (n=17,665, 8.7%) were performed during weekends/evenings. As we created additional weekend/evening appointments after COVID-19 pandemic, the annual percentage of all screening mammograms performed on evenings/weekends increased. On multivariate analysis, when compared with standard appointment times, we found that patients who were younger than age 50 (p<.001), a race other than non-Hispanic White (p<.001), non-English speakers (p<.001), and from less advantaged zip codes (p<.03) were more likely to utilize weekend/evening appointment times, compared to those aged 70 and above, Non-Hispanic White patients, English speakers, and those from the most advantaged zip codes. CONCLUSIONS: Weekend/evening appointment availability for screening mammograms might improve screening access for all patients, particularly for those younger than age 50, with race other than Non-Hispanic White, and those from less advantaged zip codes.

Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation of Nonmass Enhancement Contiguous with Malignant Index Breast Cancer Masses at Preoperative Breast MRI.

Purpose To determine the pathologic features of nonmass enhancement (NME) directly adjacent to biopsy-proven malignant masses (index masses) at preoperative MRI and determine imaging characteristics that are associated with a malignant pathologic condition. Materials and Methods This retrospective study involved the review of breast MRI and mammography examinations performed for evaluating disease extent in patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer from July 1, 2016, to September 30, 2019. Inclusion criteria were limited to patients with an index mass and the presence of NME extending directly from the mass margins. Wilcoxon rank sum test, Fisher exact test, and χ2 test were used to analyze cancer, patient, and imaging characteristics associated with the NME diagnosis. Results Fifty-eight patients (mean age, 58 years ± 12 [SD]; all women) were included. Malignant pathologic findings for mass-associated NME occurred in 64% (37 of 58) of patients, 43% (16 of 37) with ductal carcinoma in situ and 57% (21 of 37) with invasive carcinoma. NME was more likely to be malignant when associated with an index cancer that had a low Ki-67 index (<20%) (P = .04). The presence of calcifications at mammography correlating with mass-associated NME was not significantly associated with malignant pathologic conditions (P = .19). The span of suspicious enhancement measured at MRI overestimated the true span of disease at histologic evaluation (P < .001), while there was no evidence of a difference between span of calcifications at mammography and true span of disease at histologic evaluation (P = .27). Conclusion Mass-associated NME at preoperative MRI was malignant in most patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. The span of suspicious enhancement measured at MRI overestimated the true span of disease found at histologic evaluation. Keywords: Breast, Mammography © RSNA, 2024 See also the commentary by Newell in this issue.

Evaluating the Use of ChatGPT to Accurately Simplify Patient-centered Information about Breast Cancer Prevention and Screening.

Purpose To evaluate the use of ChatGPT as a tool to simplify answers to common questions about breast cancer prevention and screening. Materials and Methods In this retrospective, exploratory study, ChatGPT was requested to simplify responses to 25 questions about breast cancer to a sixth-grade reading level in March and August 2023. Simplified responses were evaluated for clinical appropriateness. All original and simplified responses were assessed for reading ease on the Flesch Reading Ease Index and for readability on five scales: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Gunning Fog Index, Coleman-Liau Index, Automated Readability Index, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (ie, SMOG) Index. Mean reading ease, readability, and word count were compared between original and simplified responses using paired t tests. McNemar test was used to compare the proportion of responses with adequate reading ease (score of 60 or greater) and readability (sixth-grade level). Results ChatGPT improved mean reading ease (original responses, 46 vs simplified responses, 70; P < .001) and readability (original, grade 13 vs simplified, grade 8.9; P < .001) and decreased word count (original, 193 vs simplified, 173; P < .001). Ninety-two percent (23 of 25) of simplified responses were considered clinically appropriate. All 25 (100%) simplified responses met criteria for adequate reading ease, compared with only two of 25 original responses (P < .001). Two of the 25 simplified responses (8%) met criteria for adequate readability. Conclusion ChatGPT simplified answers to common breast cancer screening and prevention questions by improving the readability by four grade levels, though the potential to produce incorrect information necessitates physician oversight when using this tool. Keywords: Mammography, Screening, Informatics, Breast, Education, Health Policy and Practice, Oncology, Technology Assessment Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.

Appropriateness of Information Provided by ChatGPT Regarding Breast Pathologic Diagnoses.

A multidisciplinary physician team rated information provided by ChatGPT regarding breast pathologic diagnoses. ChatGPT responses were mostly appropriate regarding accuracy, consistency, definitions provided, and clinical significance conveyed. Responses were scored lower in terms of management recommendations provided, primarily related to low agreement with recommendations for high-risk lesions.

Spatial Coherence Approaches to Distinguish Suspicious Mass Contents in Fundamental and Harmonic Breast Ultrasound Images.

When compared to fundamental B-mode imaging, coherence-based beamforming, and harmonic imaging are independently known to reduce acoustic clutter, distinguish solid from fluid content in indeterminate breast masses, and thereby reduce unnecessary biopsies during a breast cancer diagnosis. However, a systematic investigation of independent and combined coherence beamforming and harmonic imaging approaches is necessary for the clinical deployment of the most optimal approach. Therefore, we compare the performance of fundamental and harmonic images created with short-lag spatial coherence (SLSC), M-weighted SLSC (M-SLSC), SLSC combined with robust principal component analysis with no M-weighting (r-SLSC), and r-SLSC with M-weighting (R-SLSC), relative to traditional fundamental and harmonic B-mode images, when distinguishing solid from fluid breast masses. Raw channel data acquired from 40 total breast masses (28 solid, 7 fluid, 5 mixed) were beamformed and analyzed. The contrast of fluid masses was better with fundamental rather than harmonic coherence imaging, due to the lower spatial coherence within the fluid masses in the fundamental coherence images. Relative to SLSC imaging, M-SLSC, r-SLSC, and R-SLSC imaging provided similar contrast across multiple masses (with the exception of clinically challenging complicated cysts) and minimized the range of generalized contrast-to-noise ratios (gCNRs) of fluid masses, yet required additional computational resources. Among the eight coherence imaging modes compared, fundamental SLSC imaging best identified fluid versus solid breast mass contents, outperforming fundamental and harmonic B-mode imaging. With fundamental SLSC images, the specificity and sensitivity to identify fluid masses using the reader-independent metrics of contrast difference, mean lag one coherence (LOC), and gCNR were 0.86 and 1, 1 and 0.89, and 1 and 1, respectively. Results demonstrate that fundamental SLSC imaging and gCNR (or LOC if no coherence image or background region of interest is introduced) have the greatest potential to impact clinical decisions and improve the diagnostic certainty of breast mass contents. These observations are additionally anticipated to extend to masses in other organs.

Clinical and Imaging Features of MRI Screen-Detected Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Supplemental screening with breast MRI is recommended annually for patients who have greater than 20% lifetime risk for breast cancer. While there is robust data regarding features of mammographic screen-detected breast cancers, there is limited data regarding MRI-screen-detected cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Screening breast MRIs performed between August 1, 2016 and July 30, 2022 identified 50 screen-detected breast cancers in 47 patients. Clinical and imaging features of all eligible cancers were recorded. RESULTS: During the study period, 50 MRI-screen detected cancers were identified in 47 patients. The majority of MRI-screen detected cancers (32/50, 64%) were invasive. Pathology revealed ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 36% (18/50), invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) in 52% (26/50), invasive lobular carcinoma in 10% (5/50), and angiosarcoma in 2% (1/50). The majority of patients (43/47, 91%) were stage 0 or 1 at diagnosis and there were no breast cancer-related deaths during the follow-up periods. Cancers presented as masses in 50% (25/50), nonmass enhancement in 48% (25/50), and a focus in 2% (1/50). DCIS was more likely to present as nonmass enhancement (94.4%, 17/18), whereas invasive cancers were more likely to present as masses (75%, 24/32) (P < .001). All cancers that were stage 2 at diagnosis were detected either on a baseline exam or more than 4 years since the prior MRI exam. CONCLUSION: MRI screen-detected breast cancers were most often invasive cancers. Cancers detected by MRI screening had an excellent prognosis in our study population. Invasive cancers most commonly presented as a mass.

Self-scheduling of Screening Mammograms Using an Online Patient Portal: Initial 8-year Experience at a Multisite Academic Institution.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine patient factors associated with the use of self-scheduling of screening mammograms (SMs) using an online portal. METHODS: All SMs scheduled at our multisite academic institution from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2022, were included. The frequency of self-scheduling via an online portal was calculated per year. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models with generalized estimating equation were used to estimate associations between patient characteristics and scheduling format after accounting for correlations between mammograms performed on the same woman. RESULTS: During the study period, 250,369 SMs were performed in 74,860 unique patients (mean age 59 ± 12 years). Of these, 36,200 (14.5%) were self-scheduled via the online portal. Self-scheduling increased each year, from 3.7% in 2015 to 36.9% in 2022. Younger age, non-Black race, being an English speaker, and being from a nondisadvantaged zip code were significant predictors of self-scheduling on univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Age <50 years versus age ≥70 years was the patient characteristic that most strongly predicted the likelihood of self-scheduling (adjusted odds ratio 5.4, 95% confidence interval 5.2-5.6). CONCLUSIONS: Over 8 years (2015-2022), utilization of self-scheduling for screening mammography using an online patient portal increased from 3.7% to 36.9%. Age < 50 years was the patient characteristic that most strongly predicted likelihood of self-scheduling.

Can breast MRI predict pathologic response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer? A retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: For patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer, it is standard of care to perform pre- and post-NAC imaging to evaluate response to therapy prior to surgery. In this study we assess outcome metrics of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following NAC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent a breast MRI before and after NAC between 2016 and 2021 at a single, multisite academic institution. All breast MRI studies were characterized as either radiologic complete response (rCR) or non-rCR. Corresponding surgical pathology reports were reviewed and categorized as pathologic complete response (pCR) or non-pCR. We defined a positive test as having residual enhancement on MRI (non-rCR) and a positive outcome as having residual disease on final surgical pathology (non-pCR). RESULTS: There were 225 patients included in the study (mean age 52 ± 12 years). Breast cancer receptor distribution was HR+/HER2- (n = 71, 32%), HR+/HER2+ (n = 51, 23%), HR-/HER2- (n = 72, 32%), and HR-/HER2+ (n = 31, 14%). In total, 78 (35%) had rCR and 77 (34%) had pCR; 43 (19%) had both rCR and pCR. The overall accuracy rate was 69% (156/225), sensitivity 76% (113/148), specificity 56% (43/77), positive predictive value 77% (113/147), and negative predictive value 55% (43/78). The PPV was significantly associated with receptor status (p = 0.004). No patient or imaging characteristics were associated with sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Breast MRI only moderately predicts pathologic response for invasive breast cancer treated with NAC (overall accuracy 69%). PPV is significantly associated with receptor status.

Interval Breast Cancers Versus Screen Detected Breast Cancers: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: Mammographic screening detects most breast cancers but there are still women diagnosed with breast cancer between annual mammograms. We aim to identify features that differentiate screen detected breast cancers from interval breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All screening mammograms (n = 211,517) performed 7/1/2013-6/30/2020 at our institution were reviewed. Patients with breast cancer diagnosed within one year of screening were included and divided into two distinct groups: screen detected cancer group and interval cancer group. Characteristics in these groups were compared using the chi square test, fisher test, and student's T test. RESULTS: A total of 1,232 patients were included (mean age 64 +/- 11). Sensitivity of screening mammography was 92% (1,136 screen detected cancers, 96 interval cancers). Patient age, race, and personal history of breast cancer were similar between the groups (p > 0.05). Patients with interval cancers more often had dense breast tissue (75/96 = 78% versus 694/1136 = 61%, p < 0.001). Compared to screen detected cancers, interval cancers were more often primary tumor stage two or higher (41/96 = 43% versus 139/1136 = 12%, p < 0.001) and regional lymph node stage one or higher (21/96 = 22% versus 132/1136 = 12%, p = 0.003). Interval cancers were more often triple negative (16/77 = 21% versus [48/813 = 6%], p < 0.001) with high Ki67 proliferation indices (28/45 = 62% versus 188/492 = 38%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Mammographic screening had high sensitivity for breast cancer detection (92%). Interval cancers were associated with dense breast tissue and had higher stage with less favorable molecular features compared to screen detected cancers.

Axillary adenopathy detected on breast MRI following COVID-19 vaccination: outcomes and follow-up recommendations.

This retrospective study presents 110 patients with suspected COVID-19 vaccine-related axillary adenopathy on breast MRI. Our study aimed to assess the outcomes of axillary adenopathy detected on breast MRI performed within one year after COVID-19 vaccination. The median time between the COVID-19 vaccine and breast MRI was shorter in patients with detected adenopathy compared to patients without detected adenopathy (6 weeks [2-17] versus 15 [7-24] weeks, p < 0.001). Unilateral axillary adenopathy detected on breast MRI had a low malignancy rate (3.3%), and no cases of malignant axillary adenopathy were diagnosed without a known breast cancer in the ipsilateral breast. Our findings suggest that unilateral axillary adenopathy identified on breast MRI ipsilateral to a recent COVID-19 vaccination can be considered benign in the absence of a suspicious breast finding or known breast cancer. Regardless of vaccine status and timing, unilateral axillary adenopathy detected on MRI evaluation with a known malignancy or suspicious breast finding should be considered suspicious. This will avoid unnecessary scheduling constraints, patient anxiety, and cost, without delaying diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer.

Comparison of Diagnostic Mammography-Guided Biopsy and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Calcifications: Results in 1354 Biopsies.

BACKGROUND. Studies have shown improved targeting and sampling of noncalcified lesions (asymmetries, masses, and architectural distortion) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)-guided biopsy in comparison with digital mammography (DM)-guided stereotactic biopsy. Literature that compares the two techniques specifically for sampling calcifications has been scarce. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance and outcomes of DM- and DBT-guided biopsy of suspicious calcifications. METHODS. This retrospective study included 1310 patients (mean age, 58 ± 12 [SD] years) who underwent a total of 1354 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core biopsies of suspicious calcifications performed at a single institution from May 22, 2017, to December 31, 2021. The decision to use a DM-guided or DBT-guided technique was made at the discretion of the radiologist performing the biopsy. Procedure time, the number of exposures during the procedure, and the histopathologic outcomes were recorded. The two techniques were compared using a two-sample t test for continuous variables and a chi-square test for categoric variables. Additional tests were performed using generalized estimating equations to control for the effect of the individual radiologist performing the biopsy. RESULTS. A total of 348 (26%) biopsies used DM guidance, and 1006 (74%) used DBT guidance. The mean procedure time was significantly lower for DBT-guided biopsy (14.9 ± 8.0 [SD] minutes) than for DM-guided biopsy (24.7 ± 14.3 minutes) (p < .001). The mean number of exposures was significantly lower for DBT-guided biopsy (4.1 ± 1.0 [SD] exposures) than for DM-guided biopsy (9.1 ± 3.3 exposures) (p < .001). The differences in procedure time and number of exposures remained significant (both p < .001) when controlling for the effect of the radiologist performing the biopsy. There were no significant differences (all p > .05) between DM-guided and DBT-guided biopsy in terms of the malignancy rate on initial biopsy (20% vs 19%), the rate of high-risk lesion upgrading (14% vs 22%), or the final malignancy rate (23% vs 22%). CONCLUSION. DBT-guided biopsy of suspicious calcifications can be performed with shorter procedure time and fewer exposures compared with DM-guided biopsy, without a significant difference in rates of malignancy or high-risk lesion upgrading. CLINICAL IMPACT. The use of a DBT-guided, rather than a DM-guided, biopsy technique for suspicious calcifications can potentially reduce patient discomfort and radiation exposure without affecting clinical outcomes.

Coherence Metrics for Reader-Independent Differentiation of Cystic From Solid Breast Masses in Ultrasound Images.

Traditional breast ultrasound imaging is a low-cost, real-time and portable method to assist with breast cancer screening and diagnosis, with particular benefits for patients with dense breast tissue. We previously demonstrated that incorporating coherence-based beamforming additionally improves the distinction of fluid-filled from solid breast masses, based on qualitative image interpretation by board-certified radiologists. However, variable sensitivity (range: 0.71-1.00 when detecting fluid-filled masses) was achieved by the individual radiologist readers. Therefore, we propose two objective coherence metrics, lag-one coherence (LOC) and coherence length (CL), to quantitatively determine the content of breast masses without requiring reader assessment. Data acquired from 31 breast masses were analyzed. Ideal separation (i.e., 1.00 sensitivity and specificity) was achieved between fluid-filled and solid breast masses based on the mean or median LOC value within each mass. When separated based on mean and median CL values, the sensitivity/specificity decreased to 1.00/0.95 and 0.92/0.89, respectively. The greatest sensitivity and specificity were achieved in dense, rather than non-dense, breast tissue. These results support the introduction of an objective, reader-independent method for automated diagnoses of cystic breast masses.

Solitary Dilated Ducts Revisited: Malignancy Rate and Implications for Management.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: A solitary dilated duct (SDD) is a single asymmetrically dilated breast duct with diameter more than 2 mm. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) fifth edition recommends additional imaging and biopsy for SDDs without demonstrated benign etiology, however management of this rare entity remains controversial. This study describes practice patterns, malignancy rate, and features associated with high-risk/malignant SDDs to better stratify patients requiring biopsy versus follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This IRB-approved retrospective study identified mammographic, sonographic and MRI exams utilizing the term "solitary dilated duct" at a multisite academic institution between 1/1/2010 and 12/31/2020. Clinical and imaging features, BI-RADS assessments, and outcomes were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified predictors of high-risk/malignant histology. RESULTS: SDDs identified in 49 women (mean age 56.1 years) were assessed as BI-RADS 4/5 (31/49, 63%), BI-RADS 3 (9/49, 18%), or BI-RADS 2 (9/49, 18%). Most sampled lesions were benign (16/31, 52%) and the remaining were high-risk (15/31, 48%, all papillary lesions). The only papilloma with atypia on core biopsy upgraded to grade 2 DCIS on excision (malignancy rate 1/49, 2%). All anechoic SDDs were benign (n=13), and all benign SDDs lacked internal vascularity. SDDs with associated masses were associated with malignant/high-risk outcomes on multivariate analysis (p < .001). CONCLUSION: The BI-RADS fifth edition recommends biopsy for SDDs without demonstrated benign etiology. In our 11-year study period, practice patterns were variable with a low malignancy rate of 2%. Our findings suggest that anechoic SDDs may be followed, and SDDs with associated masses or internal vascularity require biopsy.

Circumscribed Masses on Breast MRI: Can MRI Features Guide Management?

OBJECTIVE: Management of circumscribed breast masses seen on MRI is largely extrapolated from mammography and US data with limited MRI-specific data available. This study aimed to assess clinical and MRI imaging features of malignant circumscribed breast masses. METHODS: In this IRB-approved retrospective study, breast MRIs performed between April 1, 2008, and August 30, 2020, containing circumscribed masses, excluding multiple bilateral circumscribed masses, were reviewed. Clinical and imaging features of all eligible masses were recorded, and associations with malignant outcomes were assessed using Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test, with P < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS: For the 165 masses that met study criteria in 158 women, the mean age was 48 years (SD 12.0 years). Nine of 165 masses were malignant (5.5%). Round masses were significantly more likely to be malignant (7/37, 18.9%) compared to oval masses (2/128, 1.7%) (P < 0.001). Among masses with available dynamic contrast kinetics data, the malignancy rate was 0/84 (0%) for persistent kinetics, 2/23 (8.7%) for plateau kinetics, and 4/24 (16.7%) for washout kinetics (P = 0.002). The malignancy rate for oval masses without washout kinetics was 0% (0/92). T2 hyperintense masses had a malignancy rate of 7/104 (6.7%), and homogeneously enhancing masses had a malignancy rate of 5/91 (5.5%). CONCLUSION: These data support the use of mass shape and dynamic contrast enhancement kinetics to guide management of circumscribed breast masses seen by MRI, with oval masses without washout kinetics and any circumscribed mass with persistent kinetics showing no malignancies in this study.

Mammography Information Systems: A Survey of Breast Imaging Radiologist Satisfaction and Perspectives.

OBJECTIVE: To assess use of mammography information systems (MISs) and explore features associated with breast imaging radiologist satisfaction. METHODS: A 22-question survey regarding MISs was distributed electronically to the Society of Breast Imaging membership between February 16, 2022 and June 28, 2022. Differences in responses between respondents satisfied and dissatisfied with their MIS were analyzed using Pearson chi-squared test, Fisher exact test, and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: The response rate was 11.4% (228/2007). Most respondents used a commercial MIS (195/228, 85.5%). Most used were Epic (47/228, 21%), MagView (47/228, 21%), and PenRad (37/228, 16%). Only 4.4% (10/228) reported that patient tracking was not integrated with results reporting. The majority (129/226, 57%) reported satisfaction with their MIS. Satisfaction correlated (P < 0.05) with features such as picture archiving and communication system integration, structured reporting, access to physician outcomes metrics, and ability to query data. Less commonly reported features such as non-English language options and recognition of laterality and patient mismatch errors also correlated with satisfaction. Lack of these features correlated with dissatisfaction (P < 0.05). Satisfaction also correlated with adequate training (P < 0.001) and technology support (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, longer time using the current MIS was independently associated with satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Most respondents used a commercial MIS and were satisfied with their system. Satisfied users reported several helpful MIS features and adequate training and support. The survey results could help MIS companies when designing new products and inform radiologists and administrators when considering a new MIS.