RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the last decade's robotic gastrectomy (RG) has increasingly widespread as a valid minimally invasive option for treatment of gastric cancer. In literature, evidence of its routine use is not yet well established. The aims of this study are to report our initial experience and to present possible advantages of our hybrid operative technique for subtotal gastrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, we analyzed data from 41 patients (22 male and 19 female) who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (RALG) with D2 lymphadenectomy using the da Vinci XI robotic system. Inclusion criteria were gastric cancer in the middle or lower portion of the stomach amenable of radical subtotal gastrectomy without preoperative suspicion of positive lymph-nodes or other organs involving and distant metastasis. All the procedures were performed by attending surgeons. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 270 min with one case of conversion to open surgery. The mean age was 71.4 (IQR 68.2-76.8) with 43.9% of patients classified as ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score ≥3. The median of lymph-nodes retrieved was 25 (IQR 19-35). No intra-operative complications occurred. Time to resume a soft diet was 5 days. Patients were hospitalized a median of 7 days. According to pathological AJCC-TNM, 21 patients were classified as advanced gastric cancer. Post-operative morbidity was recorded in 9 patients (21.9%) with major complications requiring surgical operation in 4 patients (9.8%). Elevated ASA score, fewer lymph-nodes retrieved and ICU recovery requirements were significant increased in patients with major complications. CONCLUSION: The preliminary results demonstrated that robot-assisted laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy is safe and feasible. In particular, we found that the da Vinci platform improves surgeon abilities to perform an adequate lymphadenectomy and digestive reconstruction. Further studies are necessary to better clarify the role of this high-cost technology in minimally invasive treatment of gastric cancer.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The risk of venous thromboembolism in medical patients is comparable to the risk in general surgical patients. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended for specific medical patients, but its use in clinical practice is unknown. DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the charts of consecutive patients discharged from 2 departments of Internal Medicine, one in the teaching hospital of Varese and one in the non-teaching hospital of Angera, Italy, from October to December 2000. We selected the charts of patients with clinical conditions at increased risk of venous thromboembolism requiring thromboprophylaxis according to consensus statements. The use of antithrombotic drugs and contraindications to prophylaxis were documented. RESULTS: We screened a total of 516 charts, 265 in Varese and 251 in Angera and we identified 165 patients (103 and 62, respectively) at risk of venous thromboembolism because of malignancy (53), heart failure (34), stroke (33), acute infections (23), acute respiratory failure (18), acute rheumatic disorders (3), and inflammatory bowel disease (1). Forty-two patients had contraindications to antithrombotic drugs and 11 were already on long-term oral anticoagulant treatment. Among the 112 remaining patients, prophylaxis was prescribed to 52 patients (46.4%), 35 of 60 in Varese (58.3%) and 17 of 52 in Angera (32.7%, p=0.0067). Patients with stroke and heart failure were significantly more likely to receive thromboprophylaxis than other groups of patients. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism is underused in medical patients and the proportion of patients receiving antithrombotic drugs varies with the medical condition which precipitated hospital admission. The low rate of usage of prophylaxis suggests that preventable cases of thromboembolism are occurring and that better education of physicians is required to increase the usage of thromboprophylaxis.
