The effect of administering preprocedural VITamin K on the international normalized ratio in patients anticoagulated with ACEnocoumarol (VITKACE-study): a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of the vitamin K antagonist acenocoumarol on coagulation needs to be reversed when patients undergo an invasive procedure with considerable bleeding risk. A strategy to achieve this is by administering oral vitamin K before a procedure while continuing acenocoumarol. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect on periprocedural international normalized ratio (INR) values and safety using oral vitamin K as anticoagulant reversal method. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, consecutive patients using acenocoumarol undergoing elective procedures between 2019 and 2022 were included. According to standard of care in our hospital, patients took 10 mg oral vitamin K 36 to 48 hours before the procedure while continuing their normal use of acenocoumarol. Effectiveness to lower INR to <1.8 preprocedural was assessed. Bleeding and thrombotic complications within 30 days after the procedure were assessed. Periprocedural course of INR was monitored by collecting additional blood samples. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were included for analysis. On the day of the procedure, an adequate INR of <1.8 was achieved in 99% of patients. One clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding complication and no thrombotic complications were observed during the first 30 days after the procedure. INR gradually restored to therapeutic level during the days after the procedure. CONCLUSION: Using oral vitamin K while patients continue acenocoumarol intake is an effective way to adequately lower INR before an invasive procedure. Low amount of bleeding complications and absence of thromboembolic complications suggest that this is a safe strategy. The INR values returned gradually to therapeutic range after the procedure, probably contributing to the observed low bleeding rate.

Adherence to ursodeoxycholic acid therapy in patients with cholestatic and autoimmune liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is used for treatment of cholestatic liver diseases and may improve long-term outcome. Although treatment with this hydrophilic bile acid is virtually without side effects, medication adherence might be suboptimal due to patient misconceptions, compromising clinical outcome. Our aim was to evaluate adherence to UDCA in relation to patient beliefs about medicine and to identify potential predictors of poor adherence. METHODS: Prospective open-label study recruiting patients in treatment with UDCA from April 2016 to March 2017. Adherence was assessed both by the Sensemedic dispenser and by patient-reported adherence, during 12 weeks. Good adherence was defined as ≥ 80% intake. Quality of life (by SF-36) and beliefs about medicine (by BMQ) were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 75 patients were enrolled (32% primary biliary cholangitis, 31% autoimmune hepatitis, 29% primary sclerosing cholangitis and 8% other conditions). Average adherence according to the medication dispenser was 92 ± 16% (range: 17-100). Eighty-nine percent of the patients exhibited good adherence and 11% poor adherence. According to the BMQ, 42% of all patients were accepting, 50% ambivalent, 8% indifferent and 0% skeptical to UDCA treatment. Poor adherence was associated with young age (P = 0.029) and male gender (P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the excellent safety profile of UDCA, still a significant number of patients are poorly adherent. Young age and male sex are associated with poor adherence. Efforts should be made to identify patients with poor adherence and to improve their compliance to therapy.

The Impact of Hepatitis C Virus Direct-Acting Antivirals on Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Dutch Prospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Pegylated interferon-based therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) negatively impacts nutritional state and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as health-related quality of life (HRQL). Clinical trials with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) report significant PRO improvement but real-world data are still scarce. METHODS: Prospective cohort study recruiting HCV patients treated with DAAs in 2015-2016. Data at baseline, end of treatment (EOT) and 12 weeks thereafter (FU12) included: patient-reported medication adherence; SF-36; Karnofsky Performance Status; paid labour productivity; physical exercise level; nutritional state [by body mass index (BMI) and Jamar hand grip strength (HGS)] and Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire. Potential factors predicting these PROs were evaluated with multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were enrolled: 85% male, median age 57 years, 80% genotype 1, 40% cirrhotics, 46% haemophilia. Both cure rate and patient-reported adherence were 97%. SF-36 Physical Component Summary did not change (43.2 ± 11.9, 44.9 ± 10.3 and 44.7 ± 10.9 at baseline, EOT and FU12, p = 0.71). In contrast, SF-36 mental component summary (MCS) decreased transiently during therapy (49.2 ± 11.9, 44.6 ± 10.3 and 49.9 ± 12.6 at baseline, EOT and FU12, p < 0.01). Concomitant ribavirin-use was the only independent predictor of decreased SF-36 MCS. BMI (25.7 ± 4.5 and 25.6 ± 4.4 at baseline and EOT, p = 0.8) and Jamar HGS (39.7 ± 13.0, 37.4 ± 11.9 and 37.9 ± 13.8 at baseline, EOT and FU12, p = 0.56) did not change. CONCLUSION: Our study reveals concomitant ribavirin as the only independent predictor of transient decrease in SF-36 mental HRQL during DAA therapy. In contrast to interferon-based therapy, DAAs do not affect BMI or Jamar HGS.