Going back to home to die: does it make a difference to patient survival?

BACKGROUND: Many patients wish to stay at home during the terminal stage of cancer. However, there is concern that medical care provided at home may negatively affect survival. This study therefore explored whether the survival duration differed between cancer patients who received inpatient care and those who received home care. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the place of care/death and survival duration of 190 cancer patients after their referral to a palliative care consultation team in a Japanese general hospital between 2007 and 2012. The patients were classified into a hospital care group consisting of those who received palliative care in the hospital until death, and a home care group including patients who received palliative care at home from doctors in collaboration with the palliative care consultation team. Details of the place of care, survival duration, and patient characteristics (primary site, gender, age, history of chemotherapy, and performance status) were obtained from electronic medical records, and analyzed after propensity score matching in the place of care. RESULTS: Median survival adjusted for propensity score was significantly longer in the home care group (67.0 days, n = 69) than in the hospital care group (33.0 days, n = 69; P = 0.0013). Cox's proportional hazard analysis revealed that the place of care was a significant factor for survival following adjustment for covariates including performance status. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the general concern that home care shortens the survival duration of patients is not based on evidence. A cohort study including more known prognostic factors is necessary to confirm the results.

Evaluation of A Novel Information-Sharing Instrument for Home-Based Palliative Care: A Feasibility Study.

AIM: To examine the feasibility and usefulness of a novel region-based pathway: the Regional Referral Clinical Pathway for Home-Based Palliative Care. METHOD: This was a feasibility study to evaluate the frequency of variances and the perceived usefulness of pathway using in-depth interviews. All patients with cancer referred to the palliative care team between 2011 and 2013 and received home care services were enrolled. RESULT: A total of 44 patients were analyzed, and pathway was completed in all the patients. The target outcome was achieved in 61.4% while some variances occurred in 54.5%. Nine categories were identified as the usefulness of the pathway, such as reviewing and sharing information and promoting communication, education, motivation, and relationships. CONCLUSION: This novel pathway is feasible and seems to be useful.

[Use of orally disintegrating olanzapine tablet for patients with cancerous peritonitis and postoperative gastric cancer receiving home palliative care].

In May, 2009, a man in his 30s presented to the department of outpatient palliative care of this hospital. His chief complaints were of severe nausea and abdominal fullness associated with cancerous peritonitis following surgery for gastric cancer. Abdominal fullness was reduced after the initiation of a continued subcutaneous administration of octreotide acetate, but combination therapy with metoclopramide and domperidone did not relieve nausea. The administration of olanzapine orally disintegrating tables (OLZ-ODT) at a dose of 10 mg twice daily was associated with the tendency to reduce nausea. As the symptoms were relieved, palliative care at his home was initiated. The patient's self-discontinuation of OLZ-ODT because the nausea was relieved resulted in its aggravation, but it was relieved again when the administration was resumed. Subsequently, home care was possible for approximately two and half a months without aggravation. Maintaining nausea control well leads to higher-quality care. OLZ-ODT appears to not only be effective for relieving nausea associated with cancerous peritonitis, but is also important for disseminating palliative care at home.