Efficacy of Ofatumumab and Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing MS From Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups: ASCLEPIOS I/II Subgroup Analyses.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Race and ethnicity may influence the efficacy of disease-modifying therapies in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Incidence of MS in ethnically diverse groups may be higher; however, these populations are under-represented in MS trials. This post hoc analysis compared the proportion of patients achieving 3-parameter no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3) with ofatumumab vs teriflunomide in participants with relapsing MS (RMS) enrolled in the ASCLEPIOS I/II trials by race/ethnicity subgroup. METHODS: ASCLEPIOS I/II were identical, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 trials. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive ofatumumab 20 mg every 4 weeks or teriflunomide 14 mg once daily for up to 30 months. Pooled data were used to determine the efficacy/safety of ofatumumab vs teriflunomide in participants who self-identified as non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, Hispanic/Latino, or non-Hispanic White. Participants who did not self-identify into one of these groups were classified as other/unknown. RESULTS: Of the 1,882 participants, 64 (3.4%) self-identified as non-Hispanic Black, 71 (3.8%) as non-Hispanic Asian, 145 (7.7%) as Hispanic/Latino, and 1,538 (81.7%) as non-Hispanic White. Baseline participant demographics/characteristics were largely balanced across subgroups, aside from minor variations in sex, disease duration, and MRI lesions. From months 0 to 24, the proportion of ofatumumab vs teriflunomide-treated patients achieving NEDA-3 (odds ratio [95% CI]) was as follows: non-Hispanic Black, 33.3% vs 3.4% (15.9 [1.67-151.71; p = 0.0162]); non-Hispanic Asian, 42.9% vs 21.9% (3.18 [0.95-10.59; p = 0.06]); Hispanic/Latino, 36.6% vs 18.6% (3.21 [1.32-7.79; p = 0.01]); and non-Hispanic White, 37.4% vs 16.6% (3.57 [2.73-4.67; p < 0.0001]). Rates of AEs were generally similar between treatment groups and across race/ethnicity subgroups; no new or unexpected safety signals were identified. DISCUSSION: Ofatumumab was associated with greater proportions of NEDA-3 achievement than teriflunomide across race/ethnicity subgroups in the ASCLEPIOS trials. Within each treatment group, the proportion of patients achieving NEDA-3 from months 0 to 24 was similar across the subgroups and overall pooled population. Both ofatumumab and teriflunomide were well tolerated. Future MS trials should include ethnically diverse groups to better inform treatment decisions and improve real-world patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02792218 (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02792218), NCT02792231 (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02792231). Submission date: June 2, 2016. First enrollment: August 26, 2016. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that among patients aged 18-55 years with RMS, the improvement in NEDA-3 with ofatumumab was comparably better than with teriflunomide among patients self-identified as non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic White, Hispanic/Latino, and other/unknown.

2023 Inaugural Healthcare Delivery Science: Innovation and Partnerships for Health Equity Research (DESCIPHER) Symposium.

Introduction: This article provides an overview of presentations and discussions from the inaugural Healthcare Delivery Science: Innovation and Partnerships for Health Equity Research (DESCIPHER) Symposium. Methods: The symposium brought together esteemed experts from various disciplines to explore models for translating evidence-based interventions into practice. Results: The symposium highlighted the importance of disruptive innovation in healthcare, the need for multi-stakeholder engagement, and the significance of family and community involvement in healthcare interventions. Conclusions: The article concluded with a call to action for advancing healthcare delivery science to achieve health equity.

Current opinion: Racial and ethnic health disparities in multiple sclerosis: considering the social determinants of health.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We discuss racial and ethnic disparities in multiple sclerosis (MS), outcomes, and social determinants of health (SDoH). We also provide essential considerations needed to bridge the gap in inequalities, including broader representation of racial and ethnic people in clinical trials and research in general and the inclusion of better measures of living conditions. RECENT FINDINGS: The incidence and prevalence of MS have become more diverse in the USA. There is increased recognition that racial and ethnic health disparities and inequities exist due to adverse social conditions. Clinical trials have failed to be inclusive and diverse. Training in health disparity is an essential priority of funding sources, and designing clinical trials that consider the barriers these populations face can close significant gaps. SUMMARY: The incidence, prevalence, and awareness of MS have seen an incline in diverse racial and ethnic populations. Health disparities exist in MS with Black, Hispanic, and indigenous populations appearing to have worse outcomes. SDoH play a significant role in causing these health disparities. Accessibility to clinical trials and treatment are barriers these populations face. Strategic and earnest interventions considering SDoH are critically needed to develop solutions that collectively improve health and MS care for all.

Disparities by Race in Pregnancy Care and Clinical Outcomes in Women With Multiple Sclerosis: A Diverse Multicenter Cohort

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Racial disparities exist in both neurologic and obstetric populations, underscoring the importance of evaluating pregnancy outcomes in diverse women with multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this multicenter retrospective study was to compare pregnancy care and outcomes between Black and Hispanic (underrepresented) and White women with MS. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data were extracted from medical records of 9 US MS centers for women with MS/clinically isolated syndrome who delivered live births between 2010 and 2021. Sites identified at last 15 consecutive Black/Hispanic women and a matching number of White women. Socioeconomic factors, pregnancy, and MS care/outcomes were compared between groups (underrepresented and White and then Black and Hispanic) using Wilcoxon rank sum (U statistic and effect size r reported), χ2, t tests and logistic regressions as appropriate to data type. Multiple imputation by chained equation was used to account for missing data. RESULTS: Overall, 294 pregnancies resulting in live births were analyzed ( 81 Black, 67 Hispanic, and 146 White mothers). Relative to underrepresented women, White women lived in areas of higher median (interquartile range [IQR]) Child Opportunity Index (79 [45.8] vs 22 [45.8], U = 3,824, r = 0.56, p < 0.0001) and were more often employed (84.9% vs 75%, odds ratio [OR] 2.57, CI 1.46-4.50, p = 0.0008) and privately insured (93.8% vs 56.8%, OR 11.6, CI 5.5-24.5, p < 0.0001) and more received a 14-week ultrasound (98.6% vs 93.9%, OR 4.66, CI 0.99-21.96, p = 0.027). Mode of delivery was significantly different between the three groups (X2(10,294) = 20.38, p = 0.03); notably, Black women had the highest rates of emergency cesarean deliveries, and Hispanic women highest rates of uncomplicated vaginal deliveries. Babies born to underrepresented women had lower median (IQR) birthweights than babies born to White women (3,198 g [435.3 g] vs 3,275 g [412.5 g], U = 9,255, r = 0.12, p = 0.04) and shorter median (IQR) breastfeeding duration (4.5 [3.3] vs 6.0 [4.2] months, U = 8,184, r = 0.21, p = 0.003). While underrepresented women were younger than White women (mean [SD] 30.9 [4.8] vs 33.8 [4.0], t = 1.97, CI 1.96-3.98, p < 0.0001), their median (Q1-Q3, IQR) Expanded Disability Status Scale was higher (1.5 [1-2.5, 1.5] vs 1 [0-1.5, 1.5], U = 7,260, r = 0.29, p < 0.0001) before pregnancy. Finally, medical records were missing more key data for Black women (19.7% missing vs 8.9% missing, OR 2.54, CI 1.25-5.06, p = 0.008). DISCUSSION: In this geographically diverse multicenter cohort, underrepresented women entered pregnancy with higher disability and fewer health care resources. Pregnancy represents a pivotal window where structural factors affect maternal and fetal health and neurologic trajectories; it is a critical period to optimize care and health outcomes.

The impact of medical insurance on health care access and quality for people with multiple sclerosis in the United States: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, health insurance coverage and quality mediate access to health care, a key social determinant of health. OBJECTIVE: To perform a scoping review regarding the impact of insurance coverage and benefit design on health care access and both clinical and quality of life outcomes in people with MS (pwMS). METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines were followed. A literature search was conducted from January 2010 to February 2022. Included studies were in English, peer-reviewed, US-based, and evaluated elements of insurance and their relationship with access and quality outcomes for adult pwMS. RESULTS: Our search identified 1619 articles, of which 32 met inclusion criteria. Privately insured pwMS were more likely to be on disease-modifying therapy (DMT). Increased out-of-pocket spending was associated with lower DMT adherence and greater discontinuation rates. Access to specialty pharmacy programs was associated with improved DMT adherence. CONCLUSION: Health insurance coverage and design strongly influences health care for pwMS in the United States and may be a modifiable social determinant of health. Increased pharmaceutical cost-sharing is associated with declines in DMT utilization and adherence. Further study is needed to better characterize the impacts of other core elements of health insurance, including prior authorization requirements and step therapy.

Tuberculous Meningitis or Neurosarcoidosis-a Diagnostic Quandary. From the National Multiple Sclerosis Society Case Conference Proceedings

Distinguishing granulomatous diseases remains diagnostically challenging. Clinical phenotypes and neuroimaging findings resemble many infectious and noninfectious disorders. We describe a Hispanic/Latino man diagnosed with tuberculous meningitis who deteriorated neurologically after treatments. Additional workup revealed a pathology more consistent with neurosarcoidosis. Care access delays and social circumstances likely complicated his diagnosis.

Inclusion of optic neuritis in dissemination in space improves the performance of McDonald 2017 criteria in Hispanic people with suspected multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Hispanic people compared to White people with multiple sclerosis (MS) are two times more likely to present with optic neuritis (ON). ON in dissemination in space (DIS) after a single attack is not part of the current McDonald 2017 criteria. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if adding ON in DIS (ON-modified criteria) improves the performance of the McDonald 2017 criteria in the diagnosis of MS after a single attack of ON. METHODS: Retrospective study of 102 patients of Hispanic background. Cases were reviewed between 2017 and 2021. Clinical ON was reported for 35 cases. ON in DIS was verified for 28 patients via MRI, optical coherence tomography, and/or visual evoked potential. We investigated the performance of the McDonald 2017 criteria and ON-modified criteria and calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy. RESULTS: The ON-modified criteria significantly improved the performance of the McDonald 2017 criteria (p = 0.003) and identified an additional nine patients. Both sensitivity and accuracy increased from 64% to 74% and 62% to 71%, respectively, while specificity remained unchanged (40% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10, 0.70)). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that the inclusion of ON in DIS improved the overall performance of the McDonald 2017 criteria among Hispanic people.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Multiple Sclerosis Community: A Call to Action.

Many medical organizations have begun to confront the longstanding problem of inequalities in health care delivery and the undeniable effect of disparities on health outcomes. The Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC) recognizes that disparities affect the lives of many people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and acknowledges the need to address this as an organization. The CMSC recently (1) appointed a task force, (2) conducted a survey of its membership, (3) commissioned this review article and call to action, and (4) formulated a mission statement on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), which was adopted by the CMSC's Board of Governors in March 2023. This paper summarizes recent literature on health care disparities in MS, particularly those relating to race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, and gender identity. It presents findings from CMSC's survey of members' awareness of DEI issues, the need for education and resources for MS care providers, and existing institutional policies on DEI in the members' practice settings. It also presents the task force's recommendations for next steps, which includes the goal of greater diversity in the MS workforce of the future. The CMSC will continue to revisit DEI policies and practices over time with the goal of motivating greater awareness, momentum, and positive changes within the MS community.

Health Disparities Research Curricula and Training Development: Recommendations From a National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Workgroup.

The national mandate to improve health equity in the United Sates is advancing. Racial and ethnic disparities in various aspects of health care have been clearly delineated, and sources of such disparities have been identified. However, implementing solution-focused interventions to eradicate such disparities, thereby achieving health equity in all US communities, has remained a daunting challenge, and no area more so, than with neurologic diseases. To assure success with bridging prominent disparities in neurologic outcomes, the pipeline of neurologic disparities researchers needs to be broadened, numbers of mid-career and senior disparities scientists sustained, partnerships with community stakeholders enhanced, incentivization of academic organizations pursued, education of all neurologic researchers conducted, and exemplary training of funding agency staff prioritized. To improve the current state of neurologic disparities, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke assembled a working group of its advisory council. (2020-2022) to examine the state of health disparity training and research. Through consensus building, we present identified gaps and recommendations to the current state of underrepresented groups in medicine in health disparity research and its training and curricula in the United States.

Enhancing diversity of clinical trial populations in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Demographic characteristics, social determinants of health (SDoH), health inequities, and health disparities substantially influence the general and disease-specific health outcomes of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Participants in clinical trials do not represent all people with MS treated in practice. OBJECTIVE: To provide recommendations for enhancing diversity and inclusion in clinical trials in MS. METHODS: We held an international workshop under the Auspices of the International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials in MS (the "Committee") to develop recommendations regarding diversity and inclusivity of participants of clinical trials in MS. Workshop attendees included members of the Committee as well as external participants. External participants were selected based on expertise in trials, SDoH, health equity and regulatory science, and diversity with respect to gender, race, ethnicity, and geography. RESULTS: Recommendations include use of diversity plans, community engagement and education, cultural competency training, biologically justified rather than templated eligibility criteria, adaptive designs that allow broadening of eligibility criteria over the course of a trial, and logistical and practical adjustments to reduce study participant burden. Investigators should report demographic and SDoH characteristics of participants. CONCLUSION: These recommendations provide sponsors and investigators with methods of improving diversity and inclusivity of clinical trial populations in MS.

Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: an updated consensus approach.

Accurate diagnosis of multiple sclerosis requires careful attention to its differential diagnosis-many disorders can mimic the clinical manifestations and paraclinical findings of this disease. A collaborative effort, organised by The International Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials in Multiple Sclerosis in 2008, provided diagnostic approaches to multiple sclerosis and identified clinical and paraclinical findings (so-called red flags) suggestive of alternative diagnoses. Since then, knowledge of disorders in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis has expanded substantially. For example, CNS inflammatory disorders that present with syndromes overlapping with multiple sclerosis can increasingly be distinguished from multiple sclerosis with the aid of specific clinical, MRI, and laboratory findings; studies of people misdiagnosed with multiple sclerosis have also provided insights into clinical presentations for which extra caution is warranted. Considering these data, an update to the recommended diagnostic approaches to common clinical presentations and key clinical and paraclinical red flags is warranted to inform the contemporary clinical evaluation of patients with suspected multiple sclerosis.

Impact of adherence to disease modifying therapies on long-term clinical and economic outcomes in multiple sclerosis: A claims analysis of real-world data.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurodegenerative inflammatory disease that requires long-term commitment to treatment for optimal outcomes. A variety of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are now available that reduce relapses and delay disease progression in people with MS. However, adherence remains a significant issue, with a variety of mental, physical, and emotional factors contributing to non-adherence. In a large number of studies, non-adherence has been associated with worse clinical outcomes (relapses and disease severity), a higher economic burden, and loss of work productivity. However, many of these studies were short-term (1-2 years) or cross-sectional studies; thus, more data are needed on the long-term clinical and economic impacts of DMT non-adherence. The objective of this study was to determine the longer-term impact of adherence to DMTs on disease activity and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) in people with MS. The study hypothesis was that non-adherence to DMTs would be associated long-term with worse clinical outcomes and a higher economic burden. METHODS: A retrospective administrative claims analysis of the US MarketScan® Commercial database (2011-2017) in individuals (18-65 years) with MS (based on International Classification of Disease coding) was conducted. Adherence was classified by proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥0.8 and non-adherence by PDC <0.8; sensitivity analyses helped further categorize as moderately (PDC ≥0.6-<0.8) or highly (PDC <0.6) non-adherent. Cohorts were matched using propensity score matching. Time to first relapse, annualized relapse rate (ARR), time to use of assistive devices (cane/walker or wheelchair), and annual HCRU (inpatient, emergency room [ER], outpatient, and MRI visits and costs) were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: 10,248 MS cases were identified; 58% met adherence criteria, and 42% met non-adherence criteria. Mean follow-up from diagnosis or first DMT claim was 5.3 years. Adherent individuals had a longer time to first relapse (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.90; p<0.0001), a lower ARR (0.13 vs. 0.18, respectively; rate ratio [RR] 0.75 [95% CI: 0.71-0.79]; p<0.0001), and longer lag times to cane/walker use (HR 0.79 [95% CI: 0.66-0.94]; p=0.0067) and wheelchair use (HR 0.68 [95% CI: 0.55-0.83]; p=0.0002) than non-adherent individuals. Adherent individuals had fewer annual inpatient and ER visits and lower total costs than those who were non-adherent (p<0.0001). Sensitivity analyses showed that differences in disease activity and HCRU were generally more pronounced between matched adherent and highly non-adherent pairs than between matched adherent and moderately non-adherent pairs. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in MS disease activity and HCRU were observed based on adherence to DMTs. Our study underscores the negative impact of non-adherence to DMTs on long-term clinical and economic outcomes in MS.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness After 5 Years of Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment in Black and Hispanic Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in ESTEEM.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials have included low numbers of patients from racial and ethnic minority populations; therefore, it is uncertain whether differences exist in response to disease-modifying therapies. We evaluated the real-world safety and effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) treatment over 5 years in four patient cohorts: Black, non-Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic people with relapsing-remitting MS. METHODS: ESTEEM is an ongoing, 5-year, multinational, prospective study evaluating the long-term safety and effectiveness of DMF in people with MS. The analysis included patients newly prescribed DMF in routine practice at 393 sites globally. RESULTS: Overall, 5251 patients were analyzed (220 Black, 5031 non-Black; 105 Hispanic, 5146 non-Hispanic). Median (min-max) months of follow-up was 32 (0-72) for Black, 29 (1-77) for Hispanic, and 41 (0-85) for both the non-Black and non-Hispanic populations. In total, 39 (18%) Black and 29 (28%) Hispanic patients reported adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation versus 1126 (22%) non-Black and 1136 (22%) non-Hispanic patients; gastrointestinal disorders were the most common in all subgroups. Median lymphocyte counts decreased by 37% in Black, 40% in non-Black, 10% in Hispanic, and 39% in non-Hispanic patients in the first year, then remained stable and above the lower limit of normal in most patients. Annualized relapse rates (ARRs) (95% confidence intervals) up to 5 years were 0.054 (0.038-0.078) for Black, 0.077 (0.072-0.081) for non-Black, 0.069 (0.043-0.112) for Hispanic, and 0.076 (0.072-0.081) for non-Hispanic populations, representing reductions of 91-92% compared with ARR 12 months before study entry (all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The safety profile of DMF in these subgroups was consistent with the overall ESTEEM population. Relapse rates remained low in Black and Hispanic patients, and consistent with non-Black and non-Hispanic patients. These data demonstrate a comparable real-world treatment benefit of DMF in Black and Hispanic patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02047097.

Demographics and baseline disease characteristics of Black and Hispanic patients with multiple sclerosis in the open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase IV CHIMES trial.

BACKGROUND: Black/African American patients with multiple sclerosis (BpwMS) and Hispanic/Latino patients with multiple sclerosis (HpwMS), who historically have been underrepresented in multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials, exhibit greater disease severity and more rapid disease progression than White patients with MS (WpwMS). The lack of diversity and inclusion in clinical trials, which may be due to barriers at the system, patient and study levels, impacts the ability to effectively assess risks, benefits and treatment responses in a generalized patient population. METHODS: CHIMES (Characterization of Ocrelizumab in Minorities With Multiple Sclerosis), an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase IV study of self-identified BpwMS and HpwMS aged 18-65 years with relapsing MS and an Expanded Disability Status Score (EDSS) of ≤5.5, was developed in collaboration with patients with MS, national advocacy groups and clinical researchers. Patients were enrolled at study centers across the US, including Puerto Rico, and 1 site in Kenya. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients enrolled in CHIMES: 113 (62.1%) were BpwMS, and 69 (37.9%) were HpwMS; the mean (SD) baseline EDSS score was 2.4 (1.4), and 62.6% of patients were treatment naive. Using the pooled non-BpwMS/HpwMS group in the OPERA ocrelizumab trials as a reference population, patients enrolled in CHIMES were younger, had a higher mean body mass and had a greater T2 lesion volume but similar T2 lesion number on MRI. CONCLUSION: BpwMS and HpwMS have been consistently underrepresented in clinical trials, limiting the understanding of disease biology and response to treatment in this population. Data from the CHIMES study revealed differences in demographics and some baseline disease characteristics and disease burden between BpwMS and HpwMS vs WpwMS. These differences could have an impact when assessing clinical outcomes in BpwMS and HpwMS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT04377555.

Understanding humoral immunity and multiple sclerosis severity in Black, and Latinx patients.

People identified with Black/African American or Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity are more likely to exhibit a more severe multiple sclerosis disease course relative to those who identify as White. While social determinants of health account for some of this discordant severity, investigation into contributing immunobiology remains sparse. The limited immunologic data stands in stark contrast to the volume of clinical studies describing ethnicity-associated discordant presentation, and to advancement made in our understanding of MS immunopathogenesis over the past several decades. In this perspective, we posit that humoral immune responses offer a promising avenue to better understand underpinnings of discordant MS severity among Black/African American, and Hispanic/Latinx-identifying patients.

Efficacy of Dimethyl Fumarate in Young Adults with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of the DEFINE, CONFIRM, and ENDORSE Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) showed favorable benefit-risk in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) in phase 3 DEFINE and CONFIRM trials and in the ENDORSE extension study. Disease activity can differ in younger patients with MS compared with the overall population. METHODS: Randomized patients received DMF 240 mg twice daily or placebo (PBO; years 0-2 DEFINE/CONFIRM), then DMF (years 3-10; continuous DMF/DMF or PBO/DMF; ENDORSE); maximum follow-up (combined studies) was 13 years. This integrated post hoc analysis evaluated safety and efficacy of DMF in a subgroup of young adults aged 18-29 years. RESULTS: Of 1736 patients enrolled in ENDORSE, 125 were young adults, 86 treated continuously with DMF (DMF/DMF) and 39 received delayed DMF (PBO/DMF) in DEFINE/CONFIRM. Most (n = 116 [93%]) young adults completed DMF treatment in DEFINE/CONFIRM. Median (range) follow-up time in ENDORSE was 6.5 (2.0-10.0) years. Young adults entering ENDORSE who had been treated with DMF in DEFINE/CONFIRM had a model-based Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR; 95% CI) of 0.24 (0.16-0.35) vs. 0.56 (0.35-0.88) in PBO patients. ARR remained low in ENDORSE: 0.07 (0.01-0.47) at years 9-10 (DMF/DMF group). At year 10 of ENDORSE, EDSS scores were low in young adults: DMF/DMF, 1.9 (1.4); PBO/DMF, 2.4 (1.6). At ~ 7 years, the proportion of young adults with no confirmed disability progresion was 81% for DMF/DMF and 72% for PBO/DMF. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) (SF-36 and EQ-5D) generally remained stable during ENDORSE. The most common adverse events (AEs) in young adults during ENDORSE were MS relapse (n = 53 [42%]). Most AEs were mild (n = 20 [23.3%], n = 7 [17.9%]) to moderate (n = 45 [52.3%], n = 23 [59.0%]) in the DMF/DMF and PBO/DMF groups, respectively. The most common serious AE (SAE) was MS relapse (n = 19 [15%]). CONCLUSION: The data support a favorable benefit-risk profile of DMF in young adults, as evidenced by well-characterized safety, sustained efficacy, and stable PROs. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: Clinical trials.gov, DEFINE (NCT00420212), CONFIRM (NCT00451451), and ENDORSE (NCT00835770).

Multiple sclerosis in Indigenous Peoples of the Americas: A systematic review of incidence, prevalence, and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence, prevalence and outcomes of multiple sclerosis (MS) are unclear in Indigenous Peoples (IP) who are more likely to be underrepresented in research. We completed a systematic review of MS in IP of the Americas. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases as well as references of retrieved papers. Inclusion criteria were: peer-reviewed publications (January 1990- December 2021), incidence, prevalence, or clinical outcome measures of MS in self-identified IP in the Americas. Incidence, prevalence, morbidity and mortality data were summarized and stratified by location and year of publication. Study quality was evaluated by risk of bias or confounding. RESULTS: Out of 416 titles, thirteen studies met inclusion criteria. Four studies evaluated incidence, seven prevalence, three clinical outcomes and one mortality. Most studies were completed in Canada or the United States (US). Incidence rates per 100,000 ranged from 0.48 (in US Indian Health Service records) to 8.15 (First Nations Manitoban Canadians). Prevalence ranged from 0 (Lacandonian Mexicans and Panamanians) to 188.5 (First Nations Manitoban Canadians). Incidence and prevalence are consistently lower in IP than comparator White populations. IP with MS were reported to have higher disability and faster disability progression than non-Indigenous comparators. MS-related mortality is low compared to White people. CONCLUSION: There is an absence of high-quality studies evaluating MS in IP. Available evidence indicates low, but increasing incidence and prevalence of MS in IP of the Americas. IP with MS may have worse disability than non-Indigenous comparators. Future studies should evaluate the factors influencing the increases in incidence and prevalence as well as better characterize possible disparities in MS care among IP.

Dimethyl Fumarate Delays Multiple Sclerosis in Radiologically Isolated Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: The radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) represents the earliest detectable pre-clinical phase of multiple sclerosis (MS). This study evaluated the impact of therapeutic intervention in preventing first symptom manifestation at this stage in the disease spectrum. METHODS: We conducted a multi-center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study involving people with RIS. Individuals without clinical symptoms typical of MS but with incidental brain MRI anomalies consistent with central nervous system (CNS) demyelination were included. Within 12 MS centers in the United States, participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to oral dimethyl fumarate (DMF) 240 mg twice daily or placebo. The primary endpoint was the time to onset of clinical symptoms attributable to a CNS demyelinating event within a follow-up period of 96 weeks. An intention-to-treat analysis was applied to all participating individuals in the primary and safety investigations. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02739542 (ARISE). RESULTS: Participants from 12 centers were recruited from March 9, 2016, to October 31, 2019, with 44 people randomized to dimethyl fumarate and 43 to placebo. Following DMF treatment, the risk of a first clinical demyelinating event during the 96-week study period was highly reduced in the unadjusted Cox proportional-hazards regression model (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.05-0.63, p = 0.007). More moderate adverse reactions were present in the DMF (34 [32%]) than placebo groups (19 [21%]) but severe events were similar (DMF, 3 [5%]; placebo, 4 [9%]). INTERPRETATION: This is the first randomized clinical trial demonstrating the benefit of a disease-modifying therapy in preventing a first acute clinical event in people with RIS. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:604-614.