Detection of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer: Comparing conventional and digital [18 F]-fluorocholine PET-CT using histopathology as a reference.

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) with [18 F]-fluorocholine (FCH) is used to detect and stage metastatic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. Improvements to hardware and software have recently been made. We compared the capability of detecting regional lymph node metastases using conventional and digital silicon photomultiplier (SiPM)-based PET-CT technology for FCH. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) histopathology was used as a reference method. METHODS: The study retrospectively examined 177 patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer who had undergone staging with FCH PET-CT before ePLND. Images were obtained with either the conventional Philips Gemini PET-CT (n = 93) or the digital SiPM-based GE Discovery MI PET-CT (n = 84) and compared. RESULTS: Images that were obtained using the Philips Gemini PET-CT system showed 19 patients (20%) with suspected lymph node metastases, whereas the GE Discovery MI PET-CT revealed 36 such patients (43%). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 0.3, 0.84, 0.47, and 0.72 for the Philips Gemini, while they were 0.58, 0.62, 0.31, and 0.83 for the GE Discovery MI, respectively. The areas under the curves in a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were similar between the two PET-CT systems (0.57 for Philips Gemini and 0.58 for GE Discovery MI, p = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Marked differences in sensitivity and specificity were found for the different PET-CT systems, although the overall diagnostic performance was similar. These differences are probably due to differences in both hardware and software, including reconstruction algorithms, and should be considered when new technology is introduced.

A retrospective study assessing the accuracy of [18F]-fluorocholine PET/CT for primary staging of lymph node metastases in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with extended lymph node dissection.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have investigated [18F]-fluorocholine (FCH) positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) in primary staging of men with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer and have generally shown high specificity and poor sensitivity. FCH PET/CT is not recommended for the primary staging of metastases in the European guidelines for prostate cancer. However, it has been an option in the Swedish recommendations. Our aim was to assess PET/CT for primary staging of lymph node metastases before robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) in patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer. METHOD: We identified all men with prostate cancer undergoing FCH PET/CT for initial staging followed by RALP and ePLND at Skåne University Hospital between 2015 and 2018. The result from PET/CT scan was compared with pathology report as the reference method for calculation of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: In total, 252 patients were included in the final analysis. Among 85 patients with a suspicion of regional lymph node metastases on FCH PET/CT only 31 had pathology-proven metastases. The sensitivity was 43% (95% CI 0.32-0.55) and the specificity 70% (95% CI 0.63-0.76) for PET/CT to predict lymph node metastases. PPV was 36% and NPV was 75%. Risk group analyses showed similar results. CONCLUSION: Our study emphasizes the poor performance of FCH PET/CT to predict lymph node metastasis in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. The method should be replaced with newer radiopharmaceuticals, such as prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands.