Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 56(3): 681-9, 2003 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12788173

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The use of partial breast brachytherapy (PBB) after lumpectomy for selected patients with early-stage breast cancer reduces the adjuvant radiotherapy treatment time to <1 week. Despite the advantages of accelerated treatment, maintaining an acceptable cosmetic outcome is important. In a cohort of patients who received low-dose-rate (LDR) or high-dose-rate (HDR) PBB after lumpectomy, the clinical characteristics and treatment parameters were analyzed to identify predictors for an unfavorable cosmetic outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Early-stage breast cancer patients with clear resection margins and 0-3 positive lymph nodes were eligible for PBB. Uniform guidelines for target definition and brachytherapy catheter placement were applied. The HDR PBB dose was 34 Gy in 10 fractions within 5 days, and the LDR dose was 45 Gy given at a rate of 50 cGy/h. The end points included incidence of radiation recall reaction, telangiectasias, and cosmetic-altering fibrosis. RESULTS: Between 1995 and 2000, 44 patients with early-stage breast cancer received PBB without adjuvant external beam radiotherapy after lumpectomy (31 HDR PBB, 13 LDR PBB). After a median follow-up of 42 months (range 18-86), all patients remained locally controlled. The overall rate of good/excellent cosmetic outcome was 79.6% overall and 90% with HDR PBB. Radiation recall reactions occurred in 43% of patients (6 of 14) who received adriamycin. LDR PBB and adriamycin were significant predictors for late unfavorable cosmetic changes in univariate analysis (p = 0.003 and p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although a high rate of local control and good/excellent cosmetic outcome is provided with HDR PBB, the risk of unfavorable cosmetic changes when treated with both LDR PBB and adriamycin is noteworthy. This suggests that HDR PBB is preferred in patients for whom adriamycin is indicated.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/radioterapia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirurgia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/patologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/radioterapia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/cirurgia , Carcinoma Lobular/patologia , Carcinoma Lobular/radioterapia , Carcinoma Lobular/cirurgia , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Estética , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia Segmentar , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Lesões por Radiação/patologia , Radiobiologia , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 52(4): 918-28, 2002 Mar 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11958884

RESUMO

PURPOSE: A growing body of evidence supports the efficacy of accelerated superfractionated radiotherapy with concomitant boost for advanced head-and-neck carcinomas. This study represents a single-institution experience, performed to identify the factors influencing tumor control, survival, and toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1988 and 1999, 133 patients with primary squamous cell head-and-neck carcinoma underwent accelerated superfractionated radiotherapy using a concomitant boost. The concomitant boost in this regimen was delivered using reduced fields delivered 3 times weekly in a twice-daily schedule during the final phase. The total radiation dose ranged from 64.8 Gy to 76.5 Gy (mean 71.1). Patients were evaluated in follow-up for local control and late toxicity. Multivariate analysis of treatment and patient parameters was performed to evaluate their influence on toxicity, local control, and overall survival. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 37 months, the actuarial overall survival rate for the entire group at 5 years was 24% and the local control rate was 57%. The tumor volume was the most significant predictor of local control, such that each 1-cm(3) increase in volume was associated with a 1% decrease in local control. For patients with tumor volumes 30 cm(3), the 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 52% and 27% (p = 0.004) and locoregional control rate was 76% and 26% (p <0.001), respectively. Seventy-six patients with a minimum of 12 months and median of 39 months toxicity follow-up were studied for late effects. None of these patients experienced Grade 4 or 5 toxicity. The actuarial rate of significant toxicity (Grade III or greater) was 32% at 5 years. Of the toxicities observed, xerostomia (19%) was the most common. Multivariate analysis revealed N stage and dose as independent predictors of Grade 3 effects. CONCLUSION: The locoregional control and survival for patients in this institutional experience compare favorably to other published reports. Tumors of the larynx had the best prognosis. Larger volume tumors were associated with significantly lower local control and survival. Significant late effects were related to dose and nodal status.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Análise de Variância , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/mortalidade , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 52(3): 831-6, 2002 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11849808

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We recently reported that an adenovirus-expressing mutant HSV-TK75 (AdCMV-TK75) radiosensitized rat syngeneic gliomas in combination with low concentrations of acyclovir (ACV) much more effectively than a virus expressing wild-type herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK). In this report we have examined whether similar radiosensitizing effects are also seen with human glioma cells in vitro and in vivo. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Human U87 MG glioma cells were transduced with AdCMV-TK75 and exposed to ACV followed by single-dose irradiation and colony-forming survival assays. Similarly, U87 MG xenografts were infused with AdCMV-TK75 or Adbetagal control virus, followed by ACV administration and fractionated irradiation. Therapeutic efficacy was monitored by tumor growth. RESULTS: U87 MG cells transduced with AdCMV-TK75 were significantly more sensitive to ACV (3 microM) than cells transduced with either wild-type HSV-TK or control virus. To determine whether human cells also demonstrate improved radiosensitization similar to that seen with rat glioma cells and tumors, we transduced U87 MG cells with either AdCMV-TK75, AdCMV-TK, expressing wild-type HSV-TK, or Adbetagal and then treated the cells with 3 microM of ACV. Cells transduced with AdCMV-TK75 were significantly more radiosensitive (dose enhancement ratio [D(37)]: 2.6) by colony-forming survival assay than cells transduced with either AdCMV-TK or Adbetagal. Furthermore, we found that U87 MG xenografts infused with AdCMV-TK75 by slow positive pressure infusion were more radiosensitive after administration of ACV than tumors infused with Adbetagal. A more dramatic result was achieved when fractionated irradiation was carried out concurrently with ACV administration, in which case AdCMV-TK75-treated tumors did not grow at all. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that transduction of human glioma cells in vitro and infusion of xenografts in vivo with AdCMV-TK75 and treatment with concentrations of ACV that can be achieved in vivo produce similar radiosensitization, as previously reported with rat glioma cells and intracerebral syngeneic tumors. In addition, concurrent treatment with ACV and radiation therapy is more efficient than when ACV is administered before radiation therapy.


Assuntos
Aciclovir/uso terapêutico , Adenoviridae/genética , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Glioma/radioterapia , Herpesviridae/enzimologia , Mutação , Tolerância a Radiação , Timidina Quinase/genética , Adenoviridae/enzimologia , Animais , Terapia Combinada , Glioma/tratamento farmacológico , Glioma/virologia , Humanos , Camundongos , Camundongos Nus , Radiobiologia , Timidina Quinase/metabolismo , Transdução Genética , Transplante Heterólogo , Células Tumorais Cultivadas/efeitos dos fármacos , Células Tumorais Cultivadas/efeitos da radiação , Ensaio Tumoral de Célula-Tronco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...