Distribution patterns of occlusal contact areas on natural posterior teeth - Evaluations of a cross-sectional population-based study with the Greifswald Digital Analyzing System (GEDAS).

AIM: The aim of our investigations is to optimize the anatomical basis for the design of a sufficient occlusal relationship, especially in view of the innovative technologies by analyzing the occlusal contact point patterns at cusp structures according to A-, B-, C- localization tooth by tooth on the individual occlusal surfaces in the posterior region in static habitual occlusal position. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 3300 subjects of the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP 1) the interocclusal registration in habitual intercuspation using silicone registration was used and analyzed by using the special evaluation software Greifswald Digital Analyzing System (GEDAS II). Chi square test was used to investigate whether the distribution of contact areas differed in the group of premolars or molars - each considered separately for maxilla and mandible - on the basis of the probability of error p < 0.05. RESULTS: In 709 subjects (446 male with a mean age of 48.9 ± 13.04 years; 283 female with a mean age of 52.4 ± 14.23 years) the antagonistic situation was specifically considered on natural posterior teeth without conservative or restorative-prosthetic interventions, i.e. without caries, fillings, crowns or other restorations. On the basis of these subjects, the silicone registrations were analyzed using GEDAS II. For the first and second upper molars, the ABC contact distribution was the most frequent: 20.4 % for the first and 15.3 % for the second molar. The second most frequent contact area for maxillary molars was area 0. The upper molars had contact areas only at the maxillary palatal cusp (B-/C-contacts). This contact relationship was most frequent in the maxillary premolar (18.1-18.6 %). In mandibular premolars, with the buccal cusps areas A and B were frequently involved (15.4-16.7 %). Mandibular molars showed a frequent contact pattern involving all A-, B-, C- and 0- contact areas (13.3-24.2 %). To capture the possible influence of the antagonistic dentition situation, the antagonistic situation was specifically considered and except for the mandibular premolars (p < 0.05) the contact distribution did not differ for molars and maxillary premolars regarding the dental status of the antagonistic teeth. Natural posterior teeth without occlusal contacts were observed from 20.0 % in the second lower molars to 9.7 % in the first upper molars. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a clinically relevant due to the fact, that this study is the first population-based epidemiological study to analyze the occlusal contact point patterns at cusp structures according to A-, B-, C- localization tooth by tooth on the individual occlusal surfaces in the posterior region in static habitual occlusal position in order to optimize the anatomical basis for the design of a sufficient occlusal relationship.

Number and localization of occlusal contact areas on natural posterior teeth without dental findings - evaluations of the regional baseline study (SHIP-1) with the Greifswald Digital Analyzing System (GEDAS).

Sufficient occlusion is a basic prerequisite for the functional efficiency of the occlusal surfaces. Exactly where and in what number the occlusal contacts in the posterior region should be present for this purpose is controversial. The present study investigated the number and location of occlusal contacts on posterior teeth without dental findings, ie, without caries or restorative restorations such as fillings, crowns, etc. Such natural posterior teeth were present in 709 subjects (males (m) = 446: 48.9 ± 13.04 years, females (f) = 283: 52.4 ± 14.23 years) of a subject collective of 1223 subjects (m = 648, f = 575) of the regional baseline study 'Study of Health in Pomerania 1' (SHIP-1). Silicone bite registrations in habitual intercuspation (IP) were evaluated, whereby the test persons were asked to fix the bite block with biting force without biting firmly. The registrations were scanned with a document scanner in incident and transmitted light; a calibration strip was used to determine the transparency threshold of a layer thickness of 20 µm, below and equal to which the transparent zone was considered as a contact or contact area. The Greifswald Digital Analyzing System 2 (GEDAS 2) software was used to determine the number and location of occlusal contact areas tooth by tooth. To define the localization of the contacts, a cross with two concentric circles symmetric to the longitudinal fissure was superimposed on the occlusal surface; this resulted in four inner and four outer quadrants. Thus, the number of pixels in occlusal contact areas per inner and outer quadrant could be determined. The image resolution was 300 dpi. On average (median), the premolars had two occlusal contacts each, the posterior teeth had four to five, and tooth 46 had six contacts. The right and left teeth did not differ in the frequency of occlusal contacts in the Mann-Whitney U test for independent samples. In the maxillary premolars, frequent contact areas were primarily located mesially on the inner and outer slopes of the palatal cusp. In the maxillary molars, the palatal slope of the distopalatal cusp and the inner slopes of the mesiopalatal and distopalatal cusps were frequently affected. On the mandibular premolars, the inner slopes of the buccal cusps and the buccal slope of the distobuccal cusp were particularly frequently addressed; in teeth 35 and 45, the buccal slope of the mesiobuccal cusp was also somewhat more frequently addressed. Teeth 36 and 46 frequently had contact areas on the buccal slope of the distobuccal cusp as well as on the inner slopes of the distal cusps (distobuccal and distolingual), whereas teeth 37 and 47 tended to behave similarly. Epidemiologically, the focus of the frequent contact areas on the respective supporting cusps of the maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth and a distribution of contacts stabilizing the tooth in its position in the dental arch through the interlocking were confirmed. It makes sense to take this into account when designing occlusal surfaces in the posterior region.