A novel anatomic severity grading score for acute Type B aortic dissections and correlation to aortic reinterventions after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

BACKGROUND: We introduce a novel preoperative anatomic severity grading system for acute type B aortic dissections and validate the system in a cohort of patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair. METHODS: We identified a cohort of patients who received thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute type B aortic dissection from 2008 to 2014. We developed an anatomic severity grading score (ASG) to measure attributes of aortic anatomy that we hypothesized may affect difficulty or durability of repair. Measurements were made using computed tomography angiography images and based on hypothesized severity, giving a potential score range of 0-38. RESULTS: We analyzed the computed tomography angiography images on a cohort of 30 patients with acute type B aortic dissection who underwent TEVAR. We created an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) using anatomic severity grading to predict aortic-related reinterventions. The AUROC was 0.72 (95% CI 0.39 to 1.1). Guided by the AUROC, we divided patients into two groups: a low-score group with anatomic severity grading scores <23 (n = 22), and a high-score group with scores ≥23 (n = 8). With this cutoff, anatomic severity grading exhibited 80% sensitivity and 84% specificity in predicting aortic-related reinterventions, with reinterventions in 50% of high-score patients and 4.5% of low-score patients (P = 0.011). The high score group also had significantly greater blood loss (200 vs 100 mL, P = 0.038), fluoroscopy time (36.0 vs 16.6 min; P = 0.022), and a trend for increased procedure time (164 vs 95 min; P = 0.083) than the low-risk group. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the high-score group had a significantly decreased freedom from aortic-related reinterventions than the low-score group (38% vs 100% at 12-month followup; log rank P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A preoperative anatomic severity grading score for acute type B aortic dissections consists of analysis of the proximal landing zone, curvature and tortuosity of the aorta, dissection anatomy, aortic branch vessel anatomy, and supraceliac aorta anatomy. Anatomic severity grading scores ≤23 are an excellent predictor of aortic-related reinterventions.

Carotid Duplex Ultrasonography: Additional Imaging Is Rarely Necessary for Appropriate Treatment Planning for Carotid Artery Disease.

This study was conducted to determine the utility of multiple imaging studies (CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, and/or conventional angiography), in addition to duplex ultrasonography (DU), in evaluating patients with carotid stenosis. A retrospective case series was conducted of patients with carotid stenosis who underwent DU alone or DU plus additional imaging. Concordance between DU and additional imaging and the effect on treatment plan was evaluated. Two hundred patients with carotid stenosis were evaluated. Sixty-four had DU plus additional imaging. Sixty-two of the patients (96.9%) had no change in treatment due to additional imaging. Only 2 of the 64 patients (3.1%) with additional imaging had a change in treatment plan. In conclusion, additional imaging, beyond DU, is rarely necessary for treatment planning in patients with carotid disease.

Anatomic severity grading score for primary descending thoracic aneurysms predicts procedural difficulty and aortic-related reinterventions after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

BACKGROUND: An anatomic severity grading (ASG) score for primary descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (DTAs) was developed. The objective of this study was to determine if an ASG score cutoff value for DTAs is predictive of procedural complexity, aortic-related reinterventions, and mortality in patients who undergo thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS: A retrospective review from 2008 to 2013 of patient records was conducted of all consecutive patients who underwent TEVAR for a primary DTA. A comprehensive scoring system of preoperative DTA morphology on the basis of computed tomography angiography images was established to identify and classify anatomic features that might influence outcome after TEVAR. ASG score calculations were achieved using preoperative computed tomography angiography images. Primary outcomes included primary technical success, aortic-related reinterventions, aneurysm-related mortality, and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included procedural complexity (unplanned adjunctive procedures, number of endografts implanted, contrast volume, and procedure time), endoleak formation, endoleak requiring reintervention, stroke and paraplegia, and conversion to open repair. RESULTS: Of 469 patients with a diagnosis of a thoracic aortic aneurysm, 62 patients (13%) underwent TEVAR and had adequate preoperative imaging (mean age, 71 years). Applying the ASG score, we identified 39 patients (63%) with a score ≥24 (high-score group) and 23 patients (37%) with a score <24 (low-score group). Mean follow-up was 15.3 months (range, 4 days to 3.7 years; standard deviation, 1 year) for both groups. Freedom from all-cause mortality was significantly different in the high-score (87% at 1 year, 79% at 2 years, and 57% at 3 years) vs the low-score group (100% at 1, 2, and 3-years; log-rank test, P < .021). There was no significant difference between mortality in the high-score (97% at 1 year, 87% at 2 years, and 69% at 3 years) compared with the low-score group (100% at 1, 2, and 3 years; log-rank test, P = .162). Freedom from aortic-related reinterventions was significantly lower in the high-score (82% at 1 year, 68% at 2 years, and 35% at 3 years) compared with the low-score group (100% at 1, 2, and 3 years; log-rank test, P = .002). Operative difficulty in the form of intraoperative adjunct procedures, number of endografts implanted, and procedural time had significant differences between groups (18% vs 0%, P = .038; 79% vs 39%, P = .004; 120 vs 79 minutes, P = .005, respectively). No significant difference in 30-day combined stroke and paraplegia (16%) was present between groups, and no patient had a conversion to open repair during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative ASG score for primary DTAs predicted procedure complexity and aortic-related reinterventions after TEVAR.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm anatomic severity grading score predicts implant-related complications, systemic complications, and mortality.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to examine the predictive value of the anatomic severity grading (ASG) score for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) on implant-related complications, systemic complications, and mortality at 30-day and midterm, defined as 2 years, follow-up assessments. METHODS: Patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair for infrarenal AAAs between 2009 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed, and ASG scores were calculated from three-dimensonal computed tomography reconstructions. Two independent patient groups were created: those with a low ASG score (score <14) and those with a high ASG score (score ≥14). RESULTS: We identified 190 patients (77% male), with a mean age of 73 years, and 84% Caucasian, with 104 patients in the low-score group and 86 in the high-score group. Within 30 days of the index endovascular aneurysm repair, 10 implant-related complications occurred in six patients (3%) and 25 systemic complications in 18 (9%). The incidence of 30-day implant-related complications was not significantly different between the low-score group (2 [2%]) and the high-score group (4 [5%]; P = .41). The incidence of patients with 30-day systemic complications was significantly different between the low-score group (5 [5%]) and the high score group (13 [15%]; P = .023). A composite end point of combined implant-related and systemic complications at 30 days showed there was a statistically significant difference between the low-score (7 [7%]) and high-score group (17 [20%]; P = .007). At a midterm follow up of 26 months (range, 1-64 months), implant-related complications occurred in 21 patients (11%), and systemic complications occurred in 29 (15%). The incidence of implant-related complications was significantly different between the low-score group (7 [7%]) and the high-score group (14 [16%]; P = .037). The incidence of midterm systemic complications was significantly different between the low-score group (11 [11%]) and the high-score group (18 [21%]; P = .048). A composite end point of combined implant-related and systemic complications at midterm follow-up resulted in a statistically significant difference between the low-score group (16 [15%]) and the high-score group (26 [30%]; P = .014). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the low-score group had fewer overall complications (combined implant-related and systemic) at 1 year (14% vs 34%) and 2 years (15% vs 45%) compared with the high-score group (P < .001). The low-scoring group also had significantly higher survival at 1 year (96% vs 86%) and 2 years (88% vs 84%) compared with the high-score group (P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: The AAA ASG score can be used to predict patients at risk for midterm implant-related complications, 30-day and midterm systemic complications, and all-cause mortality.

Volumetric analysis of the initial index computed tomography scan can predict the natural history of acute uncomplicated type B dissections.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to characterize the predictive impact of computed tomography (CT) scan volumetric analysis on the natural history of acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissections (ADs). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with acute type B ADs from 2009 to 2014. On an iNtuition workstation (TeraRecon, Foster City, Calif), volume measurements were obtained using the true lumen volume (TLV), false lumen volume (FLV), and total aortic volume from the left subclavian artery to the celiac artery. Growth rate was calculated as the change in maximal diameter between first and last available CT scans during the time interval. The primary outcome of the study was delayed aortic intervention. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: During a 5-year period, 164 patients had CT scan evidence of acute type B ADs; 11 patients were excluded for lack of subsequent follow-up imaging; 36 patients who underwent urgent repair (<14 days from presentation) were also excluded. We evaluated a total of 117 patients: 85 patients who did not require intervention and 32 who underwent delayed (>14 days) thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (29) or open repair (3). Mean age was 66 ± 12 years. Mean TLV/FLV ratio on initial CT scan was significantly higher in patients who did not eventually require an operation (1.55 vs 0.82; P = .02). The mean growth rate was higher in those eventually requiring operation (2.47 vs 0.42 mm/mo; P = .003). Patients were divided into three subgroups on the basis of their initial imaging TLV/FLV ratios (<0.8, 0.8-1.6, and >1.6). There was a significant difference in the growth rates between these three groups (4.6 vs 2.4 vs 0.8 mm/mo; P < .025). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a TLV/FLV ratio <0.8 was highly predictive for requiring an intervention (area = 0.8; sensitivity, 69%; specificity, 84%: positive predictive value, 71%; negative predictive value, 81%), with an odds ratio of 12.2 (confidence interval, 5-26; P < .001). Conversely, a TLV/FLV ratio of >1.6 was highly predictive for freedom from delayed operation (sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 42%; positive predictive value, 61%; negative predictive value, 86%). After Kaplan-Meier analysis, 1-year and 2-year survival free of aortic interventions was 60% and 42% with a TLV/FLV ratio <0.8 and 92% and 82% with a ratio >1.6 (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Initial CT scan volumetric analysis in patients presenting with uncomplicated acute type B ADs is a useful tool to predict growth and need for future intervention.

The effect of demographic factors and lesion severity on iliac stent patency.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to perform a large multivariate analysis to identify demographic, anatomic, or procedural factors that affect iliac artery stent primary patency (PP). METHODS: Patients receiving iliac stents from 2007 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate analysis assessed cohort characteristics and their effect on PP. Variables considered significant (P < .05) were brought forward in the multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 213 patients underwent primary iliac artery stenting, and 307 limbs were analyzed. The average age was 66 years (range, 38-93 years), 54% were male, and 55% were Caucasian. Indications for procedure were claudication in 68%, rest pain in 20%, and tissue loss in 12%. All TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC) II classifications were included: 51% TASC II A, 25% TASC II B, 13% TASC II C, and 11% TASC II D. The treated anatomic locations were 27% isolated external iliac artery (EIA), 56% isolated common iliac artery, and 17% combined common iliac artery and EIA. Multivariate analysis found three factors were correlated with decreased PP: non-Caucasian race (hazard ratio [HR], 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-3.13; P = .025), younger age (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; P = .006), and presence of EIA occlusion (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.05-3.89; P = .036). Overall, Kaplan-Meier analysis at 1 and 3 years revealed a PP of 86% and 53%, assisted PP of 98% and 89%, and secondary patency of 99% of 98%. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed PP at 1 year for was 91% Caucasian patients vs 77% for non-Caucasian (P = .001). PP was 75% in patients aged <60 years, 86% in patients aged 60-70 years, and 96% in patients aged >70 years, with a significant difference between all groups (P < .001). PP was significantly different for those with and without EIA occlusion (P = .002), with 1-year PP of 71% and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience with a large number of iliac interventions, younger age, non-Caucasian race, and EIA occlusion were strong predictors for loss of PP.

Detection of thromboxane A(2) receptor mRNA in rabbit nodose ganglion neurons.

Thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) is an arachidonic acid metabolite that is released during tissue trauma and elicits platelet aggregation and vascular smooth muscle contraction. Previous research has shown that TXA(2) stimulates pulmonary and cardiac vagal afferent neurons. Therefore, we hypothesized that the presence of the TXA(2) receptor (TP) in vagal neurons would allow for stimulation or modulation of these neurons by TXA(2). To test this hypothesis, single cell RT-PCR was employed using neurons obtained from primary cell cultures of nodose ganglia excised from adult rabbits. Since the sequence for the rabbit TP gene was unknown, a portion of the rabbit TP cDNA was first amplified, cloned, and sequenced. Primer sets for TP were then designed based on this sequence and used in conjunction with a neuronal marker, medium weight neurofilament (NFM), in multiplex RT-PCR reactions. Ninety-three cells were isolated from culture and RT-PCR was carried out on individual cells. Using an aliquot from the initial RT-PCR reaction, a second round of PCR was then employed in which the NFM and TP primer sets were split up into separate reactions. Twenty-three of the 82 cells that were positive for NFM were also positive for TP. Therefore, we conclude that the presence of TP mRNA in a subset of cultured nodose ganglion neurons allows for the possibility that TXA(2) may directly stimulate or modulate vagal afferent neurons.