Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Metabolites ; 12(12)2022 Nov 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36557232

RESUMO

Trained sensory panels are regularly used to rate food products but do not allow for data-driven approaches to steer food product development. This study evaluated the potential of a molecular-based strategy by analyzing 27 tomato soups that were enhanced with yeast-derived flavor products using a sensory panel as well as LC-MS and GC-MS profiling. These data sets were used to build prediction models for 26 different sensory attributes using partial least squares analysis. We found driving separation factors between the tomato soups and metabolites predicting different flavors. Many metabolites were putatively identified as dipeptides and sulfur-containing modified amino acids, which are scientifically described as related to umami or having "garlic-like" and "onion-like" attributes. Proposed identities of high-impact sensory markers (methionyl-proline and asparagine-leucine) were verified using MS/MS. The overall results highlighted the strength of combining sensory data and metabolomics platforms to find new information related to flavor perception in a complex food matrix.

2.
J Chromatogr A ; 1624: 461191, 2020 Aug 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32540059

RESUMO

Trapping volatiles is a convenient way to study aroma compounds but it is important to determine which volatile trapping method is most comprehensive in extracting the most relevant aroma components when investigating complex food products. Awareness of their limitations is also crucial. (Un)targeted metabolomic approaches were used to determine the volatile profiles of two commercial flavourings. Four trapping techniques were tested as was the addition of salt to the mixture. Comprehensiveness and repeatability were compared and SBSE proved particularly suitable for extracting components such as polysulfides, pyrazines and terpene alcohols, and provided an overall broader chemical spectrum. SPME proved to be more suitable in extracting sesquiterpenes and DHS in extracting monoterpenes. Adding salt to the sample had only quantitative effects on volatiles as detected by SPME. These results help clarify the advantages and limitations of different trapping techniques and hence deliver a valuable decision tool for food matrix analysis.


Assuntos
Aromatizantes/análise , Cromatografia Gasosa-Espectrometria de Massas , Aromatizantes/química , Aromatizantes/isolamento & purificação , Metabolômica , Monoterpenos/isolamento & purificação , Odorantes , Pirazinas/isolamento & purificação , Sesquiterpenos/isolamento & purificação , Microextração em Fase Sólida/métodos , Sulfetos/isolamento & purificação , Terpenos/isolamento & purificação , Compostos Orgânicos Voláteis/análise
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...