Cost implications of improving the quality of child care using integrated clinical algorithms: evidence from Northeast Brazil.

OBJECTIVES: Previous research has shown that providers trained in the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness offered higher quality care for under-fives than those providing routine care in several settings including Northeast Brazil. The objective of this paper is to examine if such quality improvements adds to total costs or is cost saving. METHODS: The additional costs associated with treating children based on IMCI clinical algorithms in northeast Brazil are estimated by comparing the total costs of under-five care in 22 municipalities with IMCI with 22 matched municipalities providing routine care. Multivariate analysis was also used to isolate the effect of IMCI on costs at primary facilities, controlling for other possible determinants. RESULTS: For 2001, there was no statistically significant difference in the cost per child of caring for under-fives in IMCI municipalities (US$ 95) relative to the comparison municipalities (US$ 98). Moreover, IMCI training had no independent effect on unit costs at primary facilities, the largest component in overall costs per child (79%). Case load was the most important determinant. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that scaling up IMCI-based care could increase child health outcomes in Brazil without increasing overall health costs.

Integrated Management of Childhood Illness: efficiency of primary health in Northeast Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: The Integrated Management of Childhood Illness is a strategy designed to address major causes of child mortality. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the strategy on the quality of child health care provided at primary facilities. METHODS: Child health quality of care and costs were compared in four states in Northeastern Brazil, in 2001. There were studied 48 health facilities considered to have had stable strategy implementation at least two years before the start of study, with 48 matched comparison facilities in the same states. A single measure of correct management of sick children was used to assess care provided to all sick children. Costs included all resources at the national, state, local and facility levels associated with child health care. RESULTS: Facilities providing strategy-based care had significantly better management of sick children at no additional cost to municipalities relative to the comparison municipalities. At strategy facilities 72% of children were correctly managed compared with 56% in comparison facilities (p=0.001). The cost per child managed correctly was US$13.20 versus US$21.05 in the strategy and comparison municipalities, respectively, after standardization for population size. CONCLUSIONS: The strategy improves the efficiency of primary facilities in Northeastern Brazil. It leads to better health outcomes at no extra cost.

Integrated Management of Childhood Illness: efficiency of primary health in Northeast Brazil

OBJECTIVE: The Integrated Management of Childhood Illness is a strategy designed to address major causes of child mortality. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the strategy on the quality of child health care provided at primary facilities. METHODS: Child health quality of care and costs were compared in four states in Northeastern Brazil, in 2001. There were studied 48 health facilities considered to have had stable strategy implementation at least two years before the start of study, with 48 matched comparison facilities in the same states. A single measure of correct management of sick children was used to assess care provided to all sick children. Costs included all resources at the national, state, local and facility levels associated with child health care. RESULTS: Facilities providing strategy-based care had significantly better management of sick children at no additional cost to municipalities relative to the comparison municipalities. At strategy facilities 72 percent of children were correctly managed compared with 56 percent in comparison facilities (p=0.001). The cost per child managed correctly was US$13.20 versus US$21.05 in the strategy and comparison municipalities, respectively, after standardization for population size. CONCLUSIONS: The strategy improves the efficiency of primary facilities in Northeastern Brazil. It leads to better health outcomes at no extra cost.

OBJETIVO: A atenção integrada às doenças prevalentes da infância é uma estratégia desenvolvida para contribuir na redução das principais causas de mortalidade infantil. O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar o impacto da estratégia sobre a saúde infantil. MÉTODOS: Compararam-se a qualidade do atendimento à saúde infantil e os custos associados em quatro estados da região Nordeste do Brasil, em 2001. Foram estudadas 48 unidades de saúde onde havia implementação estável da estratégia por pelo menos dois anos antes do início do estudo e 48 unidades sem (controle) nos mesmos estados. O percentual de crianças doentes atendidas corretamente foi utilizado para avaliar a qualidade da atenção oferecida a crianças doentes. O custo total da atenção à saúde infantil foi avaliado a partir de dados coletados nos níveis nacional, estadual, municipal e de unidade de saúde. RESULTADOS: As unidades que adotam a estratégia obtiveram desempenho significantemente melhor no atendimento de crianças doentes, sem custos adicionais em relação aos municípios sem. Nas unidades com a estratégia, 72 por cento das crianças avaliadas foram atendidas corretamente, comparado com 56 por cento nas unidades controle. O custo por criança atendida corretamente foi de US$13.20 versus US$21.05 nos municípios com e sem a estratégia respectivamente, após os ajustes para o tamanho das populações municipais. CONCLUSÕES: A estratégia melhorou a eficiência das unidades de atenção primária de saúde da região estudada. Em unidades de atenção primária com a estratégia, a qualidade do tratamento foi melhor, sem aumento de custos.

Capacity constraints to the adoption of new interventions: consultation time and the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness in Brazil.

Information on how health workers spend their time can help programme managers determine whether it is possible to add new services or activities to their schedules and at what cost. One set of interventions with the potential to reduce under-five mortality is training of facility-based health workers according to the guidelines for Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI), along with improvements to supervision, procurement and information systems that are part of the IMCI strategy. Although it has been shown that IMCI is associated with improved quality of care, it is important to determine if it also requires additional consultation time. To investigate the amount of time required to provide clinical care to children under 5 years based on IMCI compared with routine care, a time and motion study was conducted in Northeast Brazil. IMCI-trained providers spent 1 minute and 26 seconds longer per consultation with under-fives than untrained providers, holding confounding factors constant at the mean levels observed in the sample. The difference was greater when patient load was low, and decreased as the number of patients a provider saw per day increased. This has three implications. First, the ability of the system to absorb new technologies depends on current capacity utilization. Secondly, the cost of treating a child also depends on the level of capacity utilization, at least in terms of provider time. Thirdly, where patient loads are high it is important to determine if the quality of care required for IMCI can be maintained.