Exploratory Efficacy Evaluation of Apremilast for the Treatment of Japanese Patients with Palmoplantar Pustulosis: 32-Week Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

INTRODUCTION: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a pruritic, painful, chronic dermatitis that greatly impacts functioning and quality of life and can be difficult to treat. Approved treatment options for PPP are limited, and many patients do not fully respond to current treatments. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study in Japanese patients with moderate to severe PPP and inadequate response to topical treatment. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive apremilast 30 mg twice daily or placebo for 16 weeks followed by an extension phase where all patients received apremilast through week 32. PPP Area and Severity Index (PPPASI), modified PPPASI (which evaluates pustules and vesicles separately), and Palmoplantar Severity Index (PPSI) total scores and subscores (erythema, pustules/vesicles, and desquamation/scales) were evaluated over 32 weeks of apremilast treatment. Achievement of ≥ 50% improvement in PPPASI (PPPASI-50) was evaluated at week 16 among baseline demographic and clinical characteristic subgroups. RESULTS: At week 16, improvements in total score and subscores for PPPASI, modified PPASI, and PPSI, as well as rates of PPPASI-50 were at least moderately greater with apremilast than placebo. Mean PPPASI total score decreased by - 68.3% from baseline to week 32 with continued apremilast treatment. At week 32, mean change from baseline in PPPASI/modified PPPASI subscores ranged from - 58.5% to - 77.0% with apremilast. At week 32, PPSI total score for physician and patient assessments decreased by - 51.3% and - 40.0%, respectively, with continued apremilast treatment. PPPASI-50 response at week 16 was greater with apremilast versus placebo in most demographic and baseline characteristic subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in all PPPASI and PPSI total scores and subscores observed with apremilast over 16 weeks were maintained through 32 weeks in patients with moderate to severe PPP and inadequate response to topical treatment. Rates of PPPASI-50 response at week 16 were mostly consistent across patient subgroups. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: NCT04057937.

Consistent Efficacy of Apremilast in Patients with Psoriasis Regardless of Baseline Disease Severity or Special Area Involvement: Subgroup Analysis from PROMINENT.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis involvement in special areas (e.g., scalp or nails) is associated with a great disease burden yet it is often inadequately treated with topical treatments. The efficacy and tolerability of apremilast plus existing topical therapy in Japanese patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis were demonstrated in PROMINENT, a phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study. We evaluated the efficacy of apremilast across disease severities and special areas involved in these patients. METHODS: In PROMINENT, patients received apremilast 30 mg twice daily for 16 weeks in addition to their existing topical therapy, with the option of topical therapy reduction at the discretion of their physician while continuing apremilast treatment from Weeks 16 to 32. We performed a post hoc analysis, assessing apremilast efficacy and safety in Japanese patients stratified by baseline static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) score (2 [mild] or 3 [moderate]) and special area involvement. RESULTS: Of patients with baseline sPGA = 2 and sPGA = 3, 62.7% and 30.7%, respectively, achieved sPGA score 0 or 1 at Week 32. At Week 32, improvements in skin, nail, scalp, and quality of life assessments were observed regardless of baseline sPGA score. Improvements in these endpoints at Week 32 were also observed in patients with special area (scalp or nail) involvement (n = 134). Incidence of adverse events was similar between patients with baseline sPGA = 2 and sPGA = 3. CONCLUSIONS: Apremilast in combination with topical therapy may be a beneficial treatment for Japanese patients, who have limited systemic treatment options for mild to moderate psoriasis or psoriasis in special areas. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03930186.

Clinical Implications and Translation of an Off-Target Pharmacology Profiling Hit: Adenosine Uptake Inhibition In Vitro.

Off-target activities of drug candidates observed during in vitro pharmacological profiling frequently do not translate to adverse events (AEs) in human. This could be because off-target activities do not have functional consequences, are not observed at exposures achieved during clinical testing, or may not translate into clinical outcomes. We report clinical consequences of an off-target activity observed during profiling of AMG 337, a selective inhibitor of the mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor being evaluated for treatment of solid tumors. In our screen of 151 potential off-targets, AMG 337 inhibited only adenosine transporter (AT). During clinical trials, headache emerged as the dose-limiting AE in the first-in-human trial. It was thought that headache was caused by extracellular accumulation of adenosine from inhibition of AT by AMG 337 and subsequent adenosine-mediated vasodilation through adenosine receptors (ARs). Further nonclinical studies were performed to evaluate this hypothesis. AMG 337 inhibited AT function in dog and human cells in vitro and dog and human arteries ex vivo. In a dog telemetry study, AMG 337 caused hypotension, which was reduced by pretreatment with theophylline, an AR antagonist. Overall, nonclinical and clinical data suggested that headache was due to cerebral vasorelaxation caused by AMG 337-mediated inhibition of AT. When subjects were advised to drink coffee, an AR antagonist, prior to AMG 337, the severity of headaches was reduced, allowing them to continue treatment. These findings demonstrate the importance of carefully evaluating clinical observations during early drug development and the value of translational nonclinical studies to investigate the mechanism of action driving clinical observations.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Blinatumomab in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Blinatumomab is the first-and-only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved cluster of differentiation (CD) 19-directed CD3 bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) immunotherapy. It is currently FDA approved for the treatment of adults and children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) and Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and B-cell precursor ALL with minimal residual disease. Similarly, initial marketing authorization for blinatumomab in the European Union was granted for the treatment of adults with Ph- R/R B-cell precursor ALL. The benefits of treating R/R B-cell precursor ALL patients with blinatumomab include increased overall survival, more favorable hematologic remission and molecular response rates, and a lower incidence rate of selected adverse events when compared with standard-of-care chemotherapy. The key risks associated with blinatumomab treatment include cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, and medication errors. Here, we review the benefits and risks of blinatumomab treatment and describe how these risks can be mitigated.

Assessing the predictive value of the rodent neurofunctional assessment for commonly reported adverse events in phase I clinical trials.

Central Nervous System (CNS)-related safety concerns are major contributors to delays and failure during the development of new candidate drugs (CDs). CNS-related safety data on 141 small molecule CDs from five pharmaceutical companies were analyzed to identify the concordance between rodent multi-parameter neurofunctional assessments (Functional Observational Battery: FOB, or Irwin test: IT) and the five most common adverse events (AEs) in Phase I clinical trials, namely headache, nausea, dizziness, fatigue/somnolence and pain. In the context of this analysis, the FOB/IT did not predict the occurrence of these particular AEs in man. For AEs such as headache, nausea, dizziness and pain the results are perhaps unsurprising, as the FOB/IT were not originally designed to predict these AEs. More unexpected was that the FOB/IT are not adequate for predicting 'somnolence/fatigue' nonclinically. In drug development, these five most prevalent AEs are rarely responsible for delaying or stopping further progression of CDs. More serious AEs that might stop CD development occurred at too low an incidence rate in our clinical dataset to enable translational analysis.

Safety Pharmacology Evaluation of Biopharmaceuticals.

Biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals or biopharmaceuticals (BPs) are molecules such as monoclonal antibodies, soluble/decoy receptors, hormones, enzymes, cytokines, and growth factors that are produced in various biological expression systems and are used to diagnose, treat, or prevent various diseases. Safety pharmacology (SP) assessment of BPs has evolved since the approval of the first BP (recombinant human insulin) in 1982. This evolution is ongoing and is informed by various international harmonization guidelines. Based on these guidelines, the potential undesirable effect of every drug candidate (small molecule or BP) on the cardiovascular, central nervous, and respiratory systems, referred to as the "core battery," should be assessed prior to first-in-human administration. However, SP assessment of BPs poses unique challenges such as choice of test species and integration of SP parameters into repeat-dose toxicity studies. This chapter reviews the evolution of SP assessment of BPs using the approval packages of marketed BPs and discusses the past, current, and new and upcoming approach and methods that can be used to generate high-quality data for the assessment of SP of BPs.

Fishing for teratogens: a consortium effort for a harmonized zebrafish developmental toxicology assay.

A consortium of biopharmaceutical companies previously developed an optimized Zebrafish developmental toxicity assay (ZEDTA) where chorionated embryos were exposed to non-proprietary test compounds from 5 to 6 h post fertilization and assessed for morphological integrity at 5 days post fertilization. With the original 20 test compounds, this achieved an overall predictive value for teratogenicity of 88% of mammalian in vivo outcome [Gustafson, A. L., Stedman, D. B., Ball, J., Hillegass, J. M., Flood, A., Zhang, C. X., Panzica-Kelly, J., Cao, J., Coburn, A., Enright, B. P., et al. (2012). Interlaboratory assessment of a harmonized Zebrafish developmental toxicology assay-Progress report on phase I. Reprod. Toxicol. 33, 155-164]. In the second phase of this project, 38 proprietary pharmaceutical compounds from four consortium members were evaluated in two laboratories using the optimized method using either pond-derived or cultivated-strain wild-type Zebrafish embryos at concentrations up to 100µM. Embryo uptake of all compounds was assessed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Twenty eight of 38 compounds had a confirmed embryo uptake of >5%, and with these compounds the ZEDTA achieved an overall predictive value of 82% and 65% at the two respective laboratories. When low-uptake compounds (≤ 5%) were retested with logarithmic concentrations up to 1000µM, the overall predictivity across all 38 compounds was 79% and 62% respectively, with the first laboratory achieving 74% sensitivity (teratogen detection) and 82% specificity (non-teratogen detection) and the second laboratory achieving 63% sensitivity (teratogen detection) and 62% specificity (non-teratogen detection). Subsequent data analyses showed that technical differences rather than strain differences were the primary contributor to interlaboratory differences in predictivity. Based on these results, the ZEDTA harmonized methodology is currently being used for compound assessment at lead optimization stage of development by 4/5 of the consortium companies.

Itraconazole decreases left ventricular contractility in isolated rabbit heart: mechanism of action.

Itraconazole (ITZ) is an approved antifungal agent that carries a "black box warning" in its label regarding a risk of negative cardiac inotropy based on clinical findings. Since the mechanism of the negative inotropic effect is unknown, we performed a variety of preclinical and mechanistic studies to explore the pharmacological profile of ITZ and understand the negative inotropic mechanism. ITZ was evaluated in: (1) an isolated rabbit heart (IRH) preparation using Langendorff retrograde perfusion; (2) ion channel studies; (3) a rat heart mitochondrial function profiling screen; (4) a mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) assay; (5) in vitro pharmacology profiling assays (148 receptors, ion channels, transporters, and enzymes); and (6) a kinase selectivity panel (451 kinases). In the IRH, ITZ decreased cardiac contractility (>30%) at 0.3µM, with increasing effect at higher concentrations, which indicated a direct negative inotropic effect upon the heart. It also decreased heart rate and coronary flow (≥1µM) and prolonged PR/QRS intervals (3µM). In mechanistic studies, ITZ inhibited the cardiac NaV channel (IC50: 4.2µM) and was devoid of any functional inhibitory effect at the remaining pharmacological targets. Lastly, ITZ did not affect MMP, nor interfere with mitochondrial enzymes or processes involved with fuel substrate utilization or energy formation. Overall, the cardiovascular and mechanistic data suggest that ITZ-induced negative inotropy is a direct effect on the heart, in addition, the potential involvement of mitochondria function and L-type Ca(2+) channels are eliminated. The exact mechanism underlying the negative inotropy is uncertain, and requires further study.

Nonclinical strategy considerations for safety pharmacology: evaluation of biopharmaceuticals.

INTRODUCTION: Biopharmaceuticals, such as monoclonal antibodies and recombinant peptides, are important therapeutics to treat human disease. Key features of biopharmaceuticals that make them innovative medicines are their clinical effectiveness, high specificity for their human target, long half-life and target coverage, and low risk for "off-target" pharmacology. AREAS COVERED: This paper describes nonclinical safety pharmacology assessment of biopharmaceuticals with an emphasis on special considerations needed for these agents. Insight is provided on various approaches to conduct safety pharmacology studies for such therapeutics, including appropriate integration into non-rodent toxicity studies. EXPERT OPINION: The safety pharmacology evaluation of biopharmaceuticals requires a science-based, case-by-case approach, as each biological modality will have unique pharmacological characteristics that influence the overall nonclinical safety assessment strategy. The integration of safety pharmacology endpoints into general (repeat-dose) toxicity studies is a rational paradigm for assessing potential changes in the cardiovascular, central nervous, and respiratory systems, but requires thoughtful and practical planning. In some cases, especially based on target-pharmacology concerns, dedicated and optimally designed safety pharmacology studies may be needed to assess the functional risk of a new biopharmaceutical. For example, cardiovascular telemetry studies may be needed to detect small changes in arterial blood pressure after acute and chronic exposure.

Protection against acetaminophen-induced liver injury and lethality by interleukin 10: role of inducible nitric oxide synthase.

Mechanistic study of idiosyncratic drug-induced hepatitis (DIH) continues to be a challenging problem because of the lack of animal models. The inability to produce this type of hepatotoxicity in animals, and its relative rarity in humans, may be linked to the production of anti-inflammatory factors that prevent drug-protein adducts from causing liver injury by immune and nonimmune mechanisms. We tested this hypothesis by using a model of acetaminophen (APAP)-induced liver injury in mice. After APAP treatment, a significant increase was observed in serum levels of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-10, and IL-13, cytokines that regulate inflammatory mediator production and cell-mediated autoimmunity. When IL-10 knockout (KO) mice were treated with APAP, most of these mice died within 24 to 48 hours from liver injury. This increased susceptibility to APAP-induced liver injury appeared to correlate with an elevated expression of liver proinflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, and IL-1, as well as inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). In this regard, mice lacking both IL-10 and iNOS genes were protected from APAP-induced liver injury and lethality when compared with IL-10 KO mice. All strains, including wild-type animals, generated similar amounts of liver APAP-protein adducts, indicating that the increased susceptibility of IL-10 KO mice to APAP hepatotoxicity was not caused by an enhanced formation of APAP-protein adducts. In conclusion, these findings suggest that an important feature of the normal response to drug-induced liver injury may be the increased expression of anti-inflammatory factors such as IL-10. Certain polymorphisms of these factors may have a role in determining the susceptibility of individuals to idiosyncratic DIH.