Wound bed preparation using nonsurgical methods: A prospective comparative study of honey versus unripe papaya (Carica papaya).

Background: The rapidity of wound bed preparation is determined in part by the type of dressing agent employed. The extension phase in which the wound is characterized by the presence of sloughs and eschar and microbial invasion could be managed nonsurgically. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the rapidity of wound bed preparation using unripe papaya versus honey. Materials and Methods: Sixty-four patients were assigned into two equal groups, each dressed, respectively, with unripe papaya or honey. All selected patients were monitored for eschar separation and bacterial clearance time. Data obtained with a pro forma were analyzed with SPSS version 25. Results: Unripe papaya dressing had a mean eschar separation time of 5.53 ± 2.20 days and bacterial clearance time of 6.81 ± 3.64 days compared to the honey group which had an eschar separation time of 30.09 ± 27.90 days and bacterial clearance time of 15.33 ± 13.62 days. P <0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively, in comparing both outcome measures between the two groups. There was a statistically significant difference in both eschar/slough separation time and bacterial clearance time both in favor of the group prepared with unripe papaya. Conclusion: The use of unripe papaya was superior to honey in wound bed preparation with respect to eschar/slough separation, bacterial clearance ultimately resulting in reduced length of hospital stay.

Résumé Contexte: La rapidité de la préparation du lit de la plaie est déterminée en partie par le type de pansement utilisé. La phase d'extension dans laquelle la plaie est caractérisée par la présence de mucosités et d'escarres et par une invasion microbienne pourrait être gérée de manière non chirurgicale. Objectif de l'étude: L'objectif de cette étude était de comparer la rapidité de la préparation du lit de la plaie en utilisant de la papaye non mûre par rapport au miel. Matériels et méthodes: Soixante-quatre patients ont été répartis en deux groupes égaux, chacun habillé respectivement avec de la papaye non mûre ou du miel. Tous les patients sélectionnés ont été suivis pour la séparation de l'escarre et le temps de clairance bactérienne. Les données obtenues à l'aide d'un pro forma ont été analysées à l'aide de la version 25 de SPSS. Résultats: Le pansement à la papaye non mûre Le temps moyen de séparation de l'escarre était de 5,53 ± 2,20 jours et le temps de clairance bactérienne de 6,81 ± 3,64 jours pour le groupe papaye non mûre, contre 30,09 ± 27,90 jours pour le groupe miel et 15,33 ± 13,62 jours pour le temps de clairance bactérienne. P < 0,001 et P < 0,001, respectivement, dans la comparaison des deux mesures de résultats entre les deux groupes. Il y a eu une différence statistiquement significative dans le temps de séparation de l'escarre/du bourbier et dans le temps de clairance bactérienne en faveur du groupe préparé avec de la papaye non mûre. Conclusion: L'utilisation de papaye non mûre était supérieure au miel dans la préparation du lit de la plaie en ce qui concerne la séparation de l'escarre/de la pellicule, la clairance bactérienne et, en fin de compte, la réduction de la durée du séjour à l'hôpital. la durée du séjour à l'hôpital. Mots-clés: Clairance bactérienne, séparation de l'escarre, miel, papaye, lit de la plaie.

Malament stitch and increased risk of bladder neck stenosis: any association following open prostatectomy in Enugu Southeast Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Malament stitch is one of the effective techniques employed to minimize bleeding in simple open prostatectomy but concerns about possibility of increased risk of bladder neck stenosis has limited its routine use. AIM: We studied patients who had open prostatectomy with Malament stitch to determine the incidence of bladder neck stenosis amongst them. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective study of 72patients who had simple open prostatectomy in which malament stitch was applied from 2010 to 2020. A proforma was designed to collect data. Pretreatment variables were transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) volume of prostate, pretreatment IPSS value, postvoidal residual urine volume before surgery, weight of enucleated prostate adenoma, time to removal of Malament stitch. Outcome measures were done with post treatment IPSS and PVR at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Cystoscopy was done at 3 months or 6 months for patients with rising outcome measures to determine presence of bladder neck stenosis. RESULTS: The mean age of patients in this study was 68.3 years (SD = 7.1, range 52-82). The mean of the pretreatment score for IPSS was 30.7 (SD = 3.9, range 18-34) and 5.9 (SD = 0.2) for QOLS. The mean weight of prostate estimated with ultrasound was 169.5 g and mean weight of enucleated adenoma of the prostate was 132.5 g. The mean time of removal of Malament stitch was 23.1 h. Only 3 (4.2%) patients required cystoscopy because of increasing IPSS and PVR at 3 months postprostatectomy. 2 (2.8%) patients out of 72patients were confirmed to have bladder neck stenosis at cystoscopy. CONCLUSION: Malament stitch did not lead to significant incidence of bladder neck stenosis in this study.