Effects of depression and stress on oral self-care among perinatal women in Appalachia: A longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVES: Oral health during the perinatal period and beyond affects the health and well-being of women and their offspring. Oral self-care behaviours can maintain or improve oral health; depression or stress during the perinatal period may compromise these behaviours. The aim of the study was to investigate the independent and combined effects of depression and stress on oral self-care behaviours of perinatal women in Appalachia, given the high burden of oral disease in this region. METHODS: A total of 1172 women in the first or second trimester of pregnancy were enrolled in the Center for Oral Health Research in Appalachia, cohort 2 (COHRA2) in West Virginia or Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Participants completed the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, Perceived Stress Scale-10, and self-report items about oral self-care behaviours (i.e. toothbrushing and flossing) during pregnancy and five times in the 2+ years following birth. A Generalized Estimating Equation approach was used to analyse the longitudinal data. RESULTS: Maternal depression and stress were independently negatively related to toothbrushing and flossing frequency. These findings for toothbrushing were more pronounced in those with high levels of depression and high levels of stress, so there were both independent and combined effects. Frequency of toothbrushing and flossing stayed constant over time, so time was not associated with outcomes. About three-fourths of the sample reported toothbrushing levels that are consistent with established guidelines (i.e. two times daily), but almost half of the participants had very low levels of flossing (i.e. once or less a week). CONCLUSION: Interventions targeting stress and depression throughout the perinatal period might be helpful in improving oral self-care behaviours and oral health among women in Appalachia, in addition to the benefit of decreasing emotional distress.

Role of affective instability on suicidal risk in complex regional pain syndrome: a diary approach (preliminary report).

BACKGROUND: Many patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) have been known to be at risk of suicide, due to severe pain and its comorbid conditions. The risk of suicide may be associated with affective instability, which is an indicator of emotional dysregulation. Particularly, unstable shifts in negative emotions are difficult to cope with, which may result in individuals feeling uncontrollable, hopeless, and entrapped. This study aimed to examine the role of affective instability in the relationship between pain intensity and suicide risk (suicidal ideation and impulsivity) in patients with CRPS, by employing a daily diary. METHODS: Twenty-three patients registered at the CRPS Association in Korea were asked to complete a day-to-day routine for 15 days, followed by a diary composed of pain intensity, suicidal ideation, impulsivity, and positive and negative affects. RESULTS: Results showed that the interactions between negative affective instability and daily pain intensity were statistically significant on daily suicidal ideation (coefficient = 0.41, t (21) = 2.56, P < 0.050) and daily impulsiveness (coefficient = 1.20, t (19) = 3.35, P < 0.010). However, those between positive affective instability and daily pain intensity were not. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first attempt to investigate the role of affective instability on the relationship between daily pain intensity and daily suicide risk in patients with CRPS. Our findings suggest that health professionals pay considerable attention to the instability of negative affects when assessing and managing patients with CRPS at risk of suicide.

Efficacy of Interpretation Bias Modification in Patients With Chronic Pain.

Patients with chronic pain demonstrate interpretational bias to pain, and models of pain suggest interpretational bias affects subsequent pain experience. This study developed an interpretation bias modification for pain (IBM-P) and examined its efficacy. A total of 48 patients with chronic pain were recruited and randomly assigned to either the training group (n = 24) or the control group (n = 24). Interpretational bias, negative emotions, and attentional bias to pain-related stimuli were assessed before and after conducting IBM-P. The main results indicated that the training group showed less interpretational bias and negative emotions after IBM-P than the control group. The training group also gazed at neutral words longer than at "new" affective pain words after IBM-P than they did prior to the intervention. Furthermore, significant mediating effects of postinterpretational bias were found in the relationship between the group type and postnegative emotions and postdwell time bias. These results suggest that IBM-P can modify interpretational bias which leads to changes in negative emotions and attentional bias. Future research is needed to confirm the effect of modifying interpretational bias and its clinical utility in the field of pain management. PERSPECTIVE: This article investigated the efficacy of IBM-P and suggested that modifying interpretational bias is followed by changes in negative emotions and attentional bias. These findings may help health professionals understand the role of interpretational bias in chronic pain and encourage the potential use of IBM in pain management.

Validation of the Korean version of the avoidance endurance behavior questionnaire in patients with chronic pain.

BACKGROUND: The avoidance-endurance model suggests both fear-avoidance responses and endurance-related responses could affect the chronicity of pain. Proper pain intervention requires measuring fear-avoidance responses and endurance-related responses but no Korean language questionnaire has yet been made to measure them. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Avoidance-Endurance Behavior Questionnaire (K-AEQ-Behavior) by adapting the behavioral responses of Avoidance-Endurance Questionnaire into Korean language. METHODS: The K-AEQ-Behavior was forward and backward translated based on the standards for instrument translation. A total of 136 outpatients with chronic pain of a duration exceeding 3 months were recruited from a pain center at a university hospital in Seoul, Korea. Two weeks later, the K-AEQ-Behavior was re-administered to 36 patients for test-retest reliability. Exploratory factor analysis was performed using principle axis factoring. The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity of the K-AEQ-Behavior were measured by Cronbach's ⍺, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Pearson correlation coefficient, respectively. RESULTS: Although the four-factor structure (23 items) was derived in the original study, the two-factor structure of avoidance behavior and endurance behavior (21 items) was derived in the exploratory factor analysis of the Korean version in this study. Other results indicated that K-AEQ-Behavior has good internal consistency, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the K-AEQ-Behavior is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing avoidance behavior and endurance behavior in patients with chronic pain.