Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From LASER301.

PURPOSE: Lazertinib is a potent, CNS-penetrant, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This global, phase III study (LASER301) compared lazertinib versus gefitinib in treatment-naïve patients with EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion [ex19del]/L858R) locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were 18 years and older with no previous systemic anticancer therapy. Neurologically stable patients with CNS metastases were allowed. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to lazertinib 240 mg once daily orally or gefitinib 250 mg once daily orally, stratified by mutation status and race. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST v1.1. RESULTS: Overall, 393 patients received double-blind study treatment across 96 sites in 13 countries. Median PFS was significantly longer with lazertinib than with gefitinib (20.6 v 9.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.58; P < .001). The PFS benefit of lazertinib over gefitinib was consistent across all predefined subgroups. The objective response rate was 76% in both groups (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.59). Median duration of response was 19.4 months (95% CI, 16.6 to 24.9) with lazertinib versus 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.9 to 10.9) with gefitinib. Overall survival data were immature at the interim analysis (29% maturity). The 18-month survival rate was 80% with lazertinib and 72% with gefitinib (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.08; P = .116). Observed safety of both treatments was consistent with their previously reported safety profiles. CONCLUSION: Lazertinib demonstrated significant efficacy improvement compared with gefitinib in the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, with a manageable safety profile.

Efficacy and Safety of a New Sustained-release Pregabalin Formulation Compared With Immediate-release Pregabalin in Patients With Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Randomized Noninferiority Phase 3 Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether a new sustained-release (SR) pregabalin formulation is noninferior to immediate-release (IR) pregabalin in alleviating peripheral neuropathic pain in Korean patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled phase 3 study of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy or postherpetic neuralgia from 41 sites in South Korea in 2017-2018. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to receive once-daily SR pregabalin or twice-daily IR pregabalin (150 to 600 mg/d) in a double-dummy manner for 12 weeks according to a stratified permuted block randomization scheme. The primary endpoint was the Daily Pain Rating Scale score at the end of treatment, averaged from the last 7 available scores. RESULTS: A total of 319 of 371 (86.0%) randomized patients completed the 12-week treatment (SR pregabalin: n=154; IR pregabalin: n=165; per-protocol set: n=296). The least square mean difference between both groups for the primary endpoint was 0.06 (SE 0.19); (95% confidence interval -0.31 to 0.42), with the lower limit of the confidence interval above the pre-specified margin (-0.78; Pnoninferiority<0.0001). Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable between both groups. The incidence of drug-related TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation was low (SR pregabalin: 2.7%; IR pregabalin: 1.1%). No serious drug-related TEAEs or deaths occurred. DISCUSSION: The results demonstrate that the new once-daily SR pregabalin formulation is noninferior to twice-daily IR pregabalin in reducing peripheral neuropathic pain and is well tolerated in Korean patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy or postherpetic neuralgia after 12 weeks of treatment.

Pharmacokinetics of a New, Once-Daily, Sustained-release Pregabalin Tablet in Healthy Male Volunteers.

PURPOSE: A new sustained-release (SR) pregabalin formulation (YHD1119) designed for once-daily dosing has recently been developed to improve patient adherence. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics of pregabalin SR and immediate-release (IR) formulations after multiple oral doses and to assess the effect of food on the pharmacokinetic profile of the pregabalin SR formulation after a single dose in healthy individuals. METHODS: Two clinical trials were conducted: a randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, 2-treatment, 2-period crossover study to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetic properties of SR treatment (pregabalin SR 300 mg once daily for 3 days) and IR treatment (pregabalin IR 150 mg twice daily for 3 days) under fed conditions and a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-treatment, 2-period, crossover study to evaluate the effect of food intake on the pharmacokinetic properties of the pregabalin SR formulation. Plasma concentrations of pregabalin were measured using LC-MS/MS. The AUC and Cmax for pregabalin were calculated using noncompartmental method and compared between treatments in each study. FINDINGS: Thirty-one individuals in the bioequivalence study and 23 in the food effect study completed the pharmacokinetic sampling. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax,ss and AUC0-τ between the SR and IR formulations were 1.1642 (90% CI, 1.1043-1.2272) and 0.9704 (90% CI, 0.9372-1.0047), respectively. The geometric mean ratios of Cmax and AUC0-last between the SR formulation in the fed state and in the fasted state were 1.6514 (90% CI, 1.3820-1.9732) and 1.7899 (90%CI, 1.4499-2.2097), respectively. IMPLICATIONS: The bioavailability of the pregabalin SR 300 mg formulation is increased if taken with a high-fat meal. Once-daily pregabalin SR 300 mg is bioequivalent to twice-daily pregabalin IR 150 mg under fed conditions at steady state. The pregabalin SR formulation is expected to improve patient adherence. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02783183 (bioequivalence study) and NCT03191136 (food effect study).