Relationship between tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFA) gene polymorphisms and cardiac sarcoidosis.

Identification of genetic predisposition to cardiac sarcoidosis could play a critical role in the detection of sub-clinical forms of the disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible correlations between the emergence of cardiac sarcoidosis and the -1.031T/C, -857C/T, -308G/A, and -238G/A Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNFA) polymorphisms in a well-defined Greek cohort. One-hundred and seventy-three patients of Greek origin with sarcoidosis were recruited in the present study. Cardiac sarcoidosis was determined according to established criteria. Blood samples were collected and the TNFA polymorphisms were genotyped. No significant difference was noted between the patients with cardiac involvement and those without, concerning the -1.031T/C and -238G/A TNFA polymorphisms. Regarding the -857C/T polymorphism, the TT genotype and the T allele were found to be over-represented in patients with cardiac involvement (p=0.02 and 0.012, respectively). AA genotype of the -308G/A as well as the A allele were also found significantly more frequently in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (p=0.014 and 0.012 respectively). From the investigated TNFA promoter polymorphisms, we were able to deduce nine main haplotypes. Haplotypes 3 and 5, including A nucleotide at position -308, and T nucleotide at position -857 respectively, were significantly over-represented in the group with cardiac involvement. We detected an increased presence of genetic polymorphisms in the TNFA gene of patients with cardiac involvement. However, the role and the clinical application of these findings need further exploration.

Elevated pulmonary arterial systolic pressure in patients with sarcoidosis: prevalence and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Sarcoidosis-related pulmonary hypertension (SRPH) is an entity associated with significant morbidity and mortality irrespective of disease severity, while the pathogenic mechanisms remain poorly understood. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included consecutive patients with biopsy-proven sarcoidosis (n = 313) who were followed up in an outpatient setting from October 2002 through June 2010. All patients underwent clinical and cardiopulmonary evaluation, including cardiac MRI, to assess prevalence of SRPH and identify possible underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. RESULTS: By Doppler echocardiographic criteria, 37 (11.8 %) patients were found to have pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) >40 mmHg. Twelve of the 37 patients agreed to undergo right heart catheterization and SRPH was confirmed in nine patients. Compared to patients without SRPH, those with SRPH were significantly older and had greater lung function impairment; disease duration did not differ between patients with and without SRPH. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and age were independent determinants of SRPH. Pulmonary fibrosis and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction due to cardiac sarcoidosis or other comorbidities accounted for SRPH in the majority of patients. In the nonpulmonary fibrosis group, DLCO ≤ 50.65 (% predicted) was associated with SRPH (sensitivity = 77.8 %, specificity = 72.2 %; p = 0.031, AUC = 0.759). CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of sarcoidosis patients, this study found a prevalence of SRPH of about 12 %. Pulmonary fibrosis and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction due to cardiac sarcoidosis or other comorbidities are frequent pathogenic mechanisms.

Evaluation of spiral computed tomography versus ventilation/perfusion scanning in patients clinically suspected of pulmonary embolism.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of spiral computed tomography (CT) versus ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scanning in the examination of patients clinically suspected of having pulmonary embolism (PE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-three patients, presenting to the emergency department and departments of radiology and nuclear medicine of a large hospital, highly suspected of having PE, underwent sequential imaging testing with V/Q scanning and contrast-enhanced spiral CT, in addition to other clinical and laboratory tests. RESULTS: PE was diagnosed in 42 (66.7%) of the 63 patients. Thirty-nine of these 42 patients had positive findings in their CT scans, while 18 of the remaining 21 patients without PE had negative findings in their spiral CT [sensitivity, 92.9%, specificity, 85.7% Positive Predictive Value (PPV), 92.9%, Negative Predictive Value (NPV), 85.7%]. V/Q scans showed high-probability of PE in 24 of the 42 patients with PE and were negative in 9 of the remaining 21 patients without PE (sensitivity, 571%, specificity, 42.9%, PPV, 66.7%, NPV, 33.3%). There were statistically significant differences in specificity and sensitivity favoring spiral CT among men and women patients or patients > 50 years old. Fifty-four patients (85.7%) rated their satisfaction towards spiral CT as 'good' or 'very good', whereas the respective rate for V/Q scanning was only 14.3%. CONCLUSION: Spiral CT has an excellent sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for the diagnosis of PE and it could be used as the first-line imaging modality in patients suspected of PE.

Vinorelbine plus cisplatin versus docetaxel plus gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomized trial.

PURPOSE To compare the activity and tolerability of docetaxel/gemcitabine (DG) and vinorelbine/cisplatin (VC) combinations in chemotherapy-naive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either DG (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) [days 1 and 8] plus docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) [day 8]) or VC (vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) [days 1 and 8] plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) [day 8]) and prophylactic recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 microg/m(2) subcutaneously [day 9 through 15]) every 3 weeks. Results A total of 413 randomly assigned patients were analyzed for response and toxicity (DG, n = 197; VC, n = 192). Median survival was 9.0 and 9.7 months (P = .965) for DG and VC arms, respectively; the corresponding 1-year survival rates were 34.3% and 40.8%, respectively. Overall response rate was 30% (95% CI, 23.9% to 36.3%) and 39.2% (95% CI, 32.5% to 45.9%; P = .053) for DG and VC, respectively. Toxicity was as follows (DG v VC): grade 2 to 4 anemia, 34% v 55% (P = .0001); grade 3 to 4 neutropenia, 16% v 37% (P = .0001); febrile neutropenia, 6% v 11% (P = .009); and grade 3 to 4 nausea and vomiting, 1% v 15% (P = .003). Nephrotoxicity occurred in 8% and ototoxicity in 2% of VC-treated patients. There were five and six treatment-related deaths in the DG and VC arms, respectively. Quality of life was improved in DG but not in VC patients. CONCLUSION Although the two regimens produced comparable overall survival, the DG regimen had a better toxicity profile. Therefore, DG could be used in the first-line setting of advanced NSCLC, especially for patients who cannot tolerate cisplatin.