Correlation of Warm Handoffs Versus Electronic Referrals and Engagement With Mental Health Services Co-located in a Pediatric Primary Care Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the correlation of referral mechanism-warm handoff or electronic referral and attendance at behavioral health appointments in an outpatient pediatric primary care setting. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in an inner-city pediatric primary care clinic from January 2019 to December 2019. Adolescent patients who screened positive for depression or anxiety were referred to a Licensed Master Social Worker (LMSW) either via a warm handoff (WH group, n = 148) or an electronic referral (EF group, n = 180). The EF group was contacted by the LMSW via telephone to schedule an appointment. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the correlation of type of referral, age, gender, race/ethnicity, primary language, and time between referral and first contact with attendance at three appointments. RESULTS: The WH group was more likely to engage with mental health services compared to the EF group (odds ratio = 3.301, 95% confidence interval = 1.850-5.902, p = .002) while age, gender, race/ethnicity, and primary language had no correlation. Within the EF group, those who were contacted by the LMSW within 3 days (1-3 days group) were more likely to attend appointments (odds ratio = 2.680, 95% confidence interval = 0.414-8.219, p = .040). There was no difference in attendance in the WH group and the 1-3 days group (p = .913) DISCUSSION: A warm handoff between primary care providers and behavioral health clinicians is significantly correlated with engagement with behavioral health services for adolescents who screen positive for depression or anxiety. Contact with the family within 3 days of referral is significantly correlated with engagement compared to a longer duration between referral and family contact.

Comparison of PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 as Screening Tools for Depression and School Related Stress in Inner City Adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in adolescents. Suicide is one of the leading causes of mortality between 15 and 19 years. Both AAP and USPSTF recommend routine depression screening of adolescents. Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) are widely used in primary care practice, however, PHQ-2 does not screen for suicidality. School-related factors are known to affect adolescent mental health. PURPOSE: To compare PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 for depression screening in adolescents, with respect to age, gender, chronic illness over the course of 9 months. METHODS: As a QI initiative, we compared screening results in our inner-city pediatric practice using PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 from Jun'18 to Feb'19. EMR of 2364 patients 12 to 21 years were reviewed. We considered the PHQ-2 score of ≥2 and PHQ-9 of ≥10 as positive. Pre-existing chronic medical and mental illnesses were noted. RESULTS: Of these 61.5% of patients were females, 95% were Black/Hispanic, and 96% were insured by Medicaid. About 10.6% of PHQ-9 tests were positive whereas 7.4% PHQ2 were positive. Logistic regression was performed to ascertain the effects of age, gender, and chronic illness. Females were more likely to have a positive screen, as were patients with chronic illness. Age had no effect on the outcome. The screening yield for both tests was comparable in the summer months. PHQ9 yield increased while schools were in session while PHQ 2 remained stable. CONCLUSION: PHQ9 is superior as a screening test compared to PHQ2. Repeat screening should be targeted toward patients with chronic medical conditions and/or mental health diagnoses. PHQ9 may be better at screening for school-related stress.