Resilience and Mitigation Strategies of Cyanobacteria under Ultraviolet Radiation Stress.

Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) tends to damage key cellular machinery. Cells may adapt by developing several defence mechanisms as a response to such damage; otherwise, their destiny is cell death. Since cyanobacteria are primary biotic components and also important biomass producers, any drastic effects caused by UVR may imbalance the entire ecosystem. Cyanobacteria are exposed to UVR in their natural habitats. This exposure can cause oxidative stress which affects cellular morphology and vital processes such as cell growth and differentiation, pigmentation, photosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism, and enzyme activity, as well as alterations in the native structure of biomolecules such as proteins and DNA. The high resilience and several mitigation strategies adopted by a cyanobacterial community in the face of UV stress are attributed to the activation of several photo/dark repair mechanisms, avoidance, scavenging, screening, antioxidant systems, and the biosynthesis of UV photoprotectants, such as mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs), scytonemin (Scy), carotenoids, and polyamines. This knowledge can be used to develop new strategies for protecting other organisms from the harmful effects of UVR. The review critically reports the latest updates on various resilience and defence mechanisms employed by cyanobacteria to withstand UV-stressed environments. In addition, recent developments in the field of the molecular biology of UV-absorbing compounds such as mycosporine-like amino acids and scytonemin and the possible role of programmed cell death, signal perception, and transduction under UVR stress are discussed.

Adjuvant Irradiation in Carcinoma Breast Patients: Comparison of 3DCRT and Semi-automated Complex VMAT Hypofractionated Plans.

OBJECTIVE: Adjuvant radiotherapy is required for most post MRM breast cancer patients. Aim of treatment is to target radiation to region of interest while sparing Organs at Risk (OARs). Attempts are being made to decrease dose to OARs without compromising target coverage by evolving radiation techniques. In this study, a comparison of traditional 3DCRT plans is done with semi-automated complex VMAT plans for dose received by OARs namely Contralateral Breast (CLB), Ipsilateral lung (I/LL), and Contralateral Lung (C/LL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was planned for 30 post MRM breast cancer patients for chest wall, ipsilateral axilla and supraclavicular lymph node. The PTV dose was 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions, 2.66 Gy/fraction, 5 days a week. For each patient traditional 3DCRT and semi-automated complex VMAT plans (conventional + tangential VMAT plans) were prepared and evaluated by radiation oncologists. RESULTS: Dose evaluation of CLB shows higher Dmax for 3DCRT plans, while, Dmean was lower for the 3DCRT plan. Difference between D2 was not significant. V2.5 was significantly less in 3DCRT, while, difference between V5 and V10 were not significant. For C/LL Dmean, V2.5, V5, and V10 were higher for the VMAT plan. For I/LL Dmean, V5 and V10 were higher, while V20 and V30 were lower for VMAT plans. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The VMAT technique described here is a useful treatment option available for difficult planning situations. OARs stated above had a mixed result showing VMAT plans to be inferior at lower dose metrics, while, superior at higher dose metrics.