Autonomic activity during desflurane anesthesia in patients with brain tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Although intracranial tumors may affect autonomic function, there are few reports of autonomic changes during anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate autonomic effects of anesthesia in patients with brain tumors compared to neurosurgical controls. METHODS: Two groups were evaluated: group 1 = 10 neurosurgical patients undergoing spinal cord surgery, group 2 = 10 patients with intracranial tumors. After placement of electrocardiogram and Response Entropy electroencephalogram (EEG) electrodes, 10 min baseline measures were made. Heart periods were transformed into a percentage index and heart rate entropy determined as a measure of variance of autonomic activity. Tone was evaluated as the balance between accelerator and inhibitory activity. Tone-entropy was measured during propofol anesthetic induction and the first 60 min of desflurane anesthesia before the start of surgery. RESULTS: Blood pressure and heart rate were similar between the groups. Starting at awake levels, vagal heart tone was observed. Anesthesia decreased vagal dominance to near zero in both groups. Heart rate entropy and EEG activity decreased during anesthesia with no significant difference between the groups. Desflurane concentrations required to maintain anesthesia were significantly lower in patients in brain tumors. CONCLUSION: Tone-entropy analysis of heart rate indicates anesthetic related depression of autonomic activity with no difference between groups. Normal titration of desflurane concentrations to maintain adequate blood pressure produced desflurane requirements that were lower in patients with brain tumors, while autonomic and EEG activity were similar.

Autonomic activity during dexmedetomidine or fentanyl infusion with desflurane anesthesia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate autonomic activity with dexmedetomidine or fentanyl infusion and desflurane anesthesia during laparoscopic gastric banding. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, single-blinded, open-label study. SETTING: Operating rooms at a university hospital. SUBJECTS: 40 patients scheduled for laparoscopic gastric banding with a mean body mass index of 50 kg/m2. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either dexmedetomidine (0.5 microg/kg given intravenously over 10 minutes, 0.4 microg.kg-1.h-1, n=20) or fentanyl (0.5 microg.kg-1 bolus, 1 microg.kg-1.h-1, n=20) during anesthesia. Response entropy of the electroencephalogram was maintained at 45+/-5 by adjusting end-tidal desflurane concentration. MEASUREMENTS: In the operating room, blood pressure, heart rate (HR), response entropy, end-tidal desflurane concentration, tone entropy, and power-spectral analysis of HR were measured with the patient awake; 20, 40, and 60 minutes from intubation and the start of drug infusion; and at extubation. MAIN RESULTS: The mean end-tidal desflurane concentration during anesthesia was 4.0%+/-0.6% with dexmedetomidine and 4.1%+/-0.7% with fentanyl, indicating a similar anesthetic requirement in both groups. Autonomic activity, determined by tone entropy and spectral analysis of HR, decreased by 50% during anesthesia in both groups. The dexmedetomidine group showed a greater decrease in sympathovagal balance during anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Both dexmedetomidine and fentanyl facilitated anesthesia and attenuated autonomic activity. Dexmedetomidine produced a greater decrease in sympathovagal balance than fentanyl.

Fentanyl or dexmedetomidine combined with desflurane for bariatric surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Because fentanyl has ventilatory depressing effects, alternative methods for analgesia may be beneficial for management of bariatric surgery. We evaluated whether dexmedetomidine infusion could replace fentanyl for facilitation of open gastric bypass surgery. DESIGN: Randomized, single blinded, open label. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty bariatric patients with an average body mass index of 54 to 61 kg/m2 undergoing surgery for open gastric bypass. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either fentanyl (0.5-microg/kg bolus, 0.5 microg.kg(-1).h(-1), n = 10) or dexmedetomidine (0.5-microg/kg bolus, 0.4 microg.kg(-1).h(-1), n = 10) for intraoperative analgesia. In both groups, end-tidal desflurane was adjusted to maintain the bispectral index at 45 to 50. MEASUREMENTS: In the operating room, blood pressure and heart rate were measured at 5-minute intervals. Bispectral index and end-tidal desflurane concentration were measured every hour. During recovery in the postanesthesia care unit, patient-evaluated pain scores and morphine use by patient-controlled analgesia pump were determined. MAIN RESULTS: During surgery, desflurane concentrations necessary to maintain the bispectral index at 45 to 50 were decreased, and blood pressure and heart rate were lower with in the dexmedetomidine compared with fentanyl group. In the postanesthesia care unit, pain scores and morphine use were decreased in the dexmedetomidine group. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine, when used to substitute for fentanyl during gastric bypass surgery, attenuates blood pressure and provides postoperative analgesia.

Recovery from paralysis with succinylcholine increased Response entropy and EMG but not State entropy.

OBJECTIVE: It is reported that the electromyogram is an indicator of patient arousal during pain stimulation if anesthesia is inadequate. This may not be true during recovery from succinylcholine induced paralysis. We evaluated State entropy of the electroencephalogram (EEG, 0.8-32 Hz) and Response entropy, a combined measure of the electromyogram (EMG) and EEG (0.8-47 Hz), during recovery from paralysis with succinylcholine. METHODS: Twenty patients were randomized to receive either 0.8% (n = 10) or 1.4% isoflurane (n = 10), with 2 mg/kg succinylcholine administered for paralysis in all patients. State entropy and Response entropy were evaluated using a Datex-Ohmeda Entropy module. Frontal EMG was measured separately by an EEG module. State entropy, Response entropy, and EMG were measured in awake patients, during isoflurane anesthesia and paralysis, and after 100% recovery to train of four stimulation. RESULTS: Response entropy and State entropy decreased from awake levels in a dose related manner during 0.8% or 1.4% isoflurane and succinylcholine. Recovery from succinylcholine significantly increased Response entropy and EMG in 5 of 10 patients with 0.8% isoflurane and 8 of 10 with 1.4% isoflurane without a change in State entropy. CONCLUSION: Although RE and EMG increased during recovery from paralysis with succinylcholine, SE, an indicator of EEG, was not stimulated. EMG activity may not be an indicator of patient arousal after succinylcholine treatment.