RESUMO
Simulation in veterinary education provides a safe and ethical alternative to using live animals, but most simulators are single purpose and unvalidated. In this study, canine training manikins were created using readily available materials to teach fine needle aspiration (FNA) of peripheral lymph nodes, jugular venipuncture, cephalic venipuncture, intravenous catheterization, and cystocentesis. Undergraduate subjects were prospectively enrolled and stratified by veterinary experience prior to randomization into two groups. Students were taught a new skill each week through a written description of the technique, video training, and hands-on practice (live animal vs. manikin). The following week, participants were scored on the performance of the previous week's skill on a live animal using a standardized rubric by reviewers blinded to the training group. Six weeks later, the assessment was repeated for all skills. Scores were compared between groups and time points using repeated-measures ANOVA after logarithmic transformation. p < .05 was significant. There were no significant differences in scores for any of the skills between the groups immediately following or 6 weeks after training. Initial proficiency and short-term retention of clinical skills do not differ for students trained using a manikin vs. a live dog.
