Assessment of clinically significant urolithiasis positivity rate using CT KUB for suspected renal colic.

BACKGROUND: Unenhanced low-dose computed tomography of the kidneys, ureter and bladder (CT KUB) is the gold standard diagnostic imaging modality in the assessment of suspected renal colic. As the radiation dose is not negligible, it is important to monitor the diagnostic yield of CT KUBs. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic yield of CT KUB studies performed for suspected renal colic in patients presenting to the emergency department. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 500 patients who underwent CT KUB for suspected renal colic over a seven month period from June 2019 to January 2020. Clinical information and imaging was reviewed for each patient. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). RESULTS: Forty-nine percent of patients in the series were female (248/500) and the mean age was 45. The positivity rate for obstructing ureteral calculus was 34% (169/500). Concerningly, there was a significantly lower positivity rate in females compared to males (19% versus 48%; p < 0.0001) which raises the issue of unnecessary radiation exposure to this cohort. In the 200 female patients who were negative for obstructing urolithiasis, the mean age was 43. Females also had a significantly higher rate of negative CT KUB (62% versus 37%; p < 0.0001) where no underlying alternative pathology was diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: Women are less likely than men to have obstructing urolithiasis on CT KUB for suspected renal colic. This difference is not accounted for by a higher rate of alternative diagnoses among female patients. The findings of this study should prompt clinicians to exercise caution when considering this imaging modality in this patient cohort.

Magnesium implants in orthopaedic surgery create a diagnostic conundrum: A radiology case series and literature review.

During a routine post-operative orthopaedic radiograph reading session, repeated unusual radiographic soft tissue and bone appearances became evident. It was discovered that these patients had received biodegradable magnesium implants which have recently been introduced into orthopaedic clinical practice. To the untrained eye, the combination of peri-metallic bone resorption with associated soft tissue gas, could easily be mistaken for post-operative infection. The aim of this study is to properly characterise the radiographic post-operative appearances of biodegradable magnesium orthopaedic hardware. We retrospectively evaluated radiographs of all patients who underwent magnesium screw implantation for fractures over a 6 month period. Four patients, mean age of 9.75 (range: 6-15) years who underwent magnesium screw fixation following fracture were included in the study. Follow up duration was 100 days (range: 75-122) with a mean of 2.5 postoperative radiographs being performed per patient during this period. All cases demonstrated post-operative peri-metallic radiolucency which developed around the magnesium screws on x-ray, which subsequently resorbed over time. Peri-metallic soft tissue gas was observed in all patients. In two cases, magnesium implants fractured. As the use of biodegradable metal implants becomes more common, it is important for radiologists to be aware of their imaging characteristics. Prior to reporting a case, it would be prudent to know if biodegradable screws have been utilised and whether there exists a clinical concern for post-operative infection in patients with these particular implants, in which case it would be critical not to dismiss peri-prosthetic radiolucencies and soft tissue gas as merely a sequela of the natural metal degradation process.

The impact of the introduction of artificial intelligence in radiology and its potential legal implications in the UK and Ireland.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been defined as a branch of computer science dealing with the capability and simulation of a machine to imitate intelligent human behaviour. Diagnostic radiology, being a computer-based service, is unsurprisingly at the forefront of the discussion of the use of AI in medicine. There are however differing schools of thought regarding its use; namely, will AI eventually replace the radiologist? Or indeed will it ever be fully capable of replacing radiology as a speciality, but rather be used as an aid to the profession whereby a human's input will always be required? Furthermore, what will the legal implications of AI in radiology mean to the profession? Who will be liable for missed diagnoses? Is it possible that the introduction of AI to radiology will in fact make the profession busier?

The art of medicine: The reflections of a very junior doctor in breaking bad news.

Being a clinician is not simply about making the diagnosis and treating the patient. In this fast paced and ever evolving medical interface where time is of the essence, it has become unfortunately less common to witness situations that remind us that medicine is in fact, an art. Breaking bad news is an example of this. Compassion is not something that can be taught, but rather it is something that can be observed, practised and later honed. It is by observing these skills in our peers and reflecting on them that we may better ourselves as clinicians. Allow me to recount a memory of the first time that I was witness to that art at its finest.