Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Neurosurg ; 139(3): 790-797, 2023 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36738460

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Surgery is the primary treatment for craniopharyngioma with the preservation of hypothalamic function of paramount importance. Infundibular preservation is debated, as maximal resection decreases recurrence rates but causes hypopituitarism. A triphasic response of diabetes insipidus (DI), syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH), and recurrent DI has been described after pituitary surgery, but the impact of infundibular preservation on the triphasic response following craniopharyngioma resection has not been well established. The authors' objective was to assess postoperative fluid and sodium balance and differences in ADH imbalance management following endonasal craniopharyngioma resection based on infundibular transection status. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 19 patients with craniopharyngioma treated with endoscopic endonasal resection between 2014 and 2021. Resection was dichotomized into infundibular transection or preservation. Postoperative triphasic response, time to DI, and time to ADH replacement were compared using Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Based on surgeon impression, 10 patients had infundibular transection and 9 had infundibular preservation. Overall, 16 patients experienced DI, 12 experienced persistent DI, and 6 experienced SIADH. A postoperative triphasic response occurred in 40% (n = 4) of transection patients without preoperative DI and 11% (n = 1) of preservation patients without preoperative DI. The median time to postoperative DI (0.5 vs 18.0 hours, p = 0.022) and median time to ADH replacement therapy (4.5 vs 24 hours, p = 0.0004) were significantly shorter in the transection group than in the preservation group. CONCLUSIONS: Following endonasal craniopharyngioma resection, the triphasic response occurs in nearly half of infundibular transection cases. DI begins earlier with infundibular transection. On the basis of the study findings in which no patients met the criteria for SIADH or were endocrinologically unstable after postoperative day 6, it is reasonable to suggest that otherwise stable patients can be discharged at or before postoperative day 6 when ADH fluctuations have normalized and endocrinopathy is appropriately managed with oral desmopressin. Infundibular transection status may impact postoperative hormonal replacement strategies, but additional studies should evaluate their efficacies.


Assuntos
Craniofaringioma , Diabetes Insípido , Síndrome de Secreção Inadequada de HAD , Neoplasias Hipofisárias , Humanos , Craniofaringioma/cirurgia , Craniofaringioma/complicações , Síndrome de Secreção Inadequada de HAD/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/cirurgia , Neoplasias Hipofisárias/complicações , Hipófise/cirurgia , Diabetes Insípido/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia
2.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 65(2): 198-203, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30892444

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To present the surgical results of patients who underwent axis screw instrumentation, discussing surgical nuances and complications of the techniques used. METHODS: Retrospective case-series evaluation of patients who underwent spinal surgery with axis instrumentation using screws. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included in this study. The most common cause of mechanical instability was spinal cord trauma involving the axis (36 patients - 55.4%), followed by congenital craniocervical malformation (12 patients - 18.5%). Thirty-seven (57%) patients required concomitant C1 fusion. Bilateral axis fixation was performed in almost all cases. Twenty-three patients (35.4%) underwent bilateral laminar screws fixation; pars screws were used in twenty-two patients (33.8%), and pedicular screws were used isolated in only three patients (4.6%). In fourteen patients (21.5%), we performed a hybrid construction. There was no neurological worsening nor vertebral artery injury in this series. CONCLUSION: Axis screw instrumentation proved to be a safe and efficient method for cervical stabilization. Laminar and pars screws were the most commonly used.


Assuntos
Vértebra Cervical Áxis/cirurgia , Parafusos Ósseos , Fusão Vertebral/instrumentação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Parafusos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992) ; 65(2): 198-203, Feb. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-990341

RESUMO

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: To present the surgical results of patients who underwent axis screw instrumentation, discussing surgical nuances and complications of the techniques used. METHODS: Retrospective case-series evaluation of patients who underwent spinal surgery with axis instrumentation using screws. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included in this study. The most common cause of mechanical instability was spinal cord trauma involving the axis (36 patients - 55.4%), followed by congenital craniocervical malformation (12 patients - 18.5%). Thirty-seven (57%) patients required concomitant C1 fusion. Bilateral axis fixation was performed in almost all cases. Twenty-three patients (35.4%) underwent bilateral laminar screws fixation; pars screws were used in twenty-two patients (33.8%), and pedicular screws were used isolated in only three patients (4.6%). In fourteen patients (21.5%), we performed a hybrid construction. There was no neurological worsening nor vertebral artery injury in this series. CONCLUSION: Axis screw instrumentation proved to be a safe and efficient method for cervical stabilization. Laminar and pars screws were the most commonly used


RESUMO OBJETIVO: Apresentar os resultados cirúrgicos de pacientes submetidos à instrumentação com parafusos do áxis, discutindo nuances cirúrgicas e complicações das técnicas utilizadas. MÉTODOS: Série retrospectiva de pacientes submetidos à instrumentação do áxis utilizando parafusos. RESULTADOS: Sessenta e cinco pacientes foram incluídos neste estudo. A causa mais comum de instabilidade foi trauma raquimedular envolvendo o áxis (36 pacientes - 55,4%), seguida por malformação craniocervical congênita (12 pacientes - 18,5%). Trinta e sete (57%) pacientes necessitaram concomitante fusão de C1. Fixação bilateral foi realizada em quase todos os casos. Vinte e três pacientes (35,4%) foram submetidos à fixação com parafusos de lâmina; parafusos de pars foram utilizados em 22 pacientes (33,8%) e de pedículo, isoladamente, em três (4,6%). Em 14 casos (21,5%), realizamos técnicas combinadas. Não houve piora neurológica ou lesão de artéria vertebral nesta série de casos. CONCLUSÃO: A instrumentação com parafusos do áxis foi um método seguro e eficaz para estabilização cervical. A fixação da lâmina e a da pars foram as técnicas mais utilizadas.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Fusão Vertebral/instrumentação , Vértebra Cervical Áxis/cirurgia , Parafusos Ósseos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...