A European survey of antibiotic management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection: current clinical opinion and practice.

Although the epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) varies across Europe, healthcare-associated MRSA infections are common in many countries. Despite several national guidelines, the approach to treatment of MRSA infections varies across the continent, and there are multiple areas of management uncertainty for which there is little clinical evidence to guide practice. A faculty, convened to explore some of these areas, devised a survey that was used to compare the perspectives of infection specialists from across Europe on the management of MRSA infections with those of the faculty specialists. The survey instrument, a web-based questionnaire, was sent to 3840 registered delegates of the 19th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, held in April 2009. Of the 501 (13%) respondents to the survey, 84% were infection/microbiology specialists and 80% were from Europe. This article reports the survey results from European respondents, and shows a broad range of opinion and practice on a variety of issues pertaining to the management of minor and serious MRSA infections, such as pneumonia, bacteraemia, and skin and soft tissue infections. The issues include changing epidemiology, when and when not to treat, choice of treatment, and duration and route of treatment. The survey identified areas where practice can be improved and where further research is needed, and also identified areas of pan-European consensus of opinion that could be applied to European guidelines for the management of MRSA infection.

Failure of bacteriophage typing to detect an inter-hospital outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Zagreb subsequently identified by random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

OBJECTIVE: To establish the extent of inter-hospital spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Zagreb and to determine the most suitable method for typing local strains. METHODS: We analyzed a collection of 33 MRSA isolates from three Zagreb hospitals together with five unrelated British MRSA isolates by antibiogram typing, bacteriophage typing, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) after digestion with Smal restriction endonuclease. Bacteriophage typing was done with the international set of S. aureus typing phages. RAPD and PFGE profiles were analyzed visually and by using the 'GelCompar' computer program. RESULTS: Antibiogram typing provided eight profiles. Thirty (91%) of the 33 Croatian strains of MRSA were non-typable by phage typing. Visual analysis of RAPD products identified six, and visual analysis of PFGE fragments nine, distinct profiles. Computer analysis of RAPD data separated British isolates from the Croatian ones, but did not cluster the visually determined RAPD types. PFGE computer analysis separated British isolates and clustered isolates in concordance with visual interpretation. Thirty-one of the 38 isolates (82%) were visually grouped in the same clusters by both molecular methods. The dominant strain was present in each of the three hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Bacteriophage typing was unhelpful for the analysis of Croatian MRSA, since most strains were untypable with the international set of bacteriophages. RAPD and PFGE were more successful in typing the organisms and showed evidence of inter-hospital spread of one predominant MRSA strain in all three Zagreb hospitals. Thus RAPD and PFGE proved to be a useful aid in elucidating the epidemiology of MRSA infection in Zagreb hospitals and should be established in Croatia for typing MRSA.