Elevated insulin levels contribute to the reduced growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone in obese subjects.

We have recently presented experimental evidence indicating that insulin has a physiologic inhibitory effect on growth hormone (GH) release in healthy humans. The aim of the present study was to determine whether in obesity, which is characterized by hyperinsulinemia and blunted GH release, insulin contributes to the GH defect. To this aim, we used a simplified experimental protocol previously used in healthy humans to isolate the effect of insulin by removing the interference of free fatty acids (FFAs), which are known to block GH release. Six obese subjects (four men and two women; age, 30.8 +/- 5.2 years; body mass index, 36.8 +/- 2.8 kg/m2 [mean +/- SE]) and six normal subjects (four men and two women; age, 25.8 +/- 1.9 years; body mass index, 22.7 +/- 1.1 kg/m2) received intravenous (i.v.) GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) 0.6 microg/kg under three experimental conditions: (1) i.v. 0.9% NaCl infusion and oral placebo, (2) i.v. 0.9% NaCl infusion and oral acipimox, an antilipolytic agent able to reduce FFA levels (250 mg at 6 and 2 hours before GHRH), and (3) euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (insulin infusion rate, 0.4 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)). As expected, after placebo, the GH response to GHRH was lower for obese subjects versus normals (488 +/- 139 v 1,755 +/- 412 microg/L x 120 min, P < .05). Acipimox markedly reduced FFA levels and produced a mild reduction of insulin levels; under these conditions, the GH response to GHRH was increased in both groups, remaining lower in obese versus normal subjects (1,842 +/- 360 v 4,871 +/- 1,286 microg/L x 120 min, P < .05). In both groups, insulin infusion yielded insulin levels usually observed under postprandial conditions and reduced circulating FFA to the levels observed after acipimox administration. Again, the GH response to GHRH was lower for obese subjects versus normals (380 +/- 40 v 1,075 +/- 206 microg/L x 120 min, P < .05), and in both groups, it was significantly lower than the corresponding response after acipimox. In obese subjects, as previously reported in normals, the GH response to GHRH was inversely correlated with the mean serum insulin (r = -.70, P < .01). In conclusion, our data indicate that in the obese, as in normal subjects, the GH response to GHRH is a function of insulin levels. The finding that after both the acipimox treatment and the insulin clamp the obese still show higher insulin levels and a lower GH response to GHRH than normal subjects suggests that hyperinsulinemia is a major determinant of the reduced GH release associated with obesity.

Evidence for an inhibitory effect of physiological levels of insulin on the growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone in healthy subjects.

It has been previously reported that in healthy subjects, the acute reduction of free fatty acids (FFA) levels by acipimox enhances the GH response to GHRH. In the present study, the GH response to GHRH was evaluated during acute blockade of lipolysis obtained either by acipimox or by insulin at different infusion rates. Six healthy subjects (four men and two women, 25.8 +/- 1.9 yrs old, mean +/- SE) underwent three GHRH tests (50 micrograms iv, at 1300 h) during: 1) iv 0.9% NaCl infusion (1200-1500 h) after oral acipimox administration (250 mg) at 0700 h and at 1100 h; 2) 0.1 mU.kg-1.min-1 euglycemic insulin clamp (1200-1500 h) after oral acipimox administration (250 mg at 0700 h and at 1100 h); 3) 0.4 mU.kg-1.min-1 euglycemic insulin clamp (1200-1500 h) after oral placebo administration (at 0700 and 1100 h). Serum insulin (immunoreactive insulin) levels were significantly different in the three tests (12 +/- 2, 100 +/- 10, 194 +/- 19 pmol/L, P < 0.06), plasma FFA were low and similar (0.04 +/- 0.003, 0.02 +/- 0.005, 0.02 +/- 0.003, not significant), and the GH response to GHRH was progressively lower (4871 +/- 1286, 2414 +/- 626, 1076 +/- 207 micrograms/L 120 min), although only test 3 was significantly different from test 1 (P < 0.05). Pooling the three tests together, a significant negative regression was observed between mean serum immunoreactive insulin levels and the GH response to GHRH (r = -0.629, P < 0.01). Our results indicate that in healthy subjects, acipimox and hyperinsulinemia produce a similar decrease in FFA levels and that at similar low FFA, the GH response to GHRH is lower during insulin infusion than after acipimox. These data suggest that insulin exerts a negative effect on GH release. Because the insulin levels able to reduce the GH response to GHRH are commonly observed during the day, for instance during the postprandial period, we conclude that the insulin negative effect on GH release may have physiological relevance.

Assessment of growth hormone (GH) plasma clearance rate, half-life, and volume of distribution in acromegalic patients: the combined GH-octreotide infusion.

In acromegaly, high GH levels are primarily attributable to GH hypersecretion, but the contribution of GH clearance is still under debate and is difficult to assess. In the present study, GH plasma clearance rate (PCR), half-life (t1/2), and volume of distribution (VD) were assessed in seven acromegalic patients and seven normal lean subjects, after suppression of endogenous GH release by octreotide, with use of a constant GH infusion. An octreotide sc infusion was started the night before the day of the test (2100 h) and maintained throughout the study. On the day of the test, exogenous GH was constantly infused iv for 6 h (0900-1500 h) in order to achieve a new steady state of GH levels. After the cessation of GH infusion, the decay curve of serum GH levels was monitored for 1 h. In both groups, GH PCR was calculated from the steady state serum GH levels, and GH t1/2 was estimated from the monoexponential analysis of the GH disappearance curve. Estimates of VD were derived from PCR and t1/2. In acromegalic patients, GH PCR was 2.5 +/- 0.2 mL/kg.min-1, and GH t1/2 and VD were 15.7 +/- 1.0 min and 54.9 +/- 5.5 mL/kg, respectively. GH PCR and GH t1/2 of acromegalic patients were higher and lower, respectively, than those of normal subjects (PCR, 1.7 +/- 0.2 mL/kg.min-1, P < 0.02; t1/2, 18.4 +/- 0.6 min, P < 0.05). VD was not significantly different in the two groups. In summary, in acromegalic patients GH kinetic parameters can be reliably assessed by using a constant GH infusion after suppression of endogenous GH release by octreotide. Our results also indicate that the increased circulating GH levels observed in acromegaly are attributable only to GH overproduction and do not depend on an alteration in the processes of GH distribution or disappearance.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of cabergoline, a prolactin-lowering drug, after administration of increasing oral doses (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 milligrams) in healthy male volunteers.

Cabergoline (CAB) a long-acting dopaminergic ergoline derivative, was given orally, in single doses of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg, to 12 healthy men in order to evaluate its PRL-lowering effect as well as its plasma pharmacokinetics and urinary excretion. Drug administrations were separated by 5-week washout periods. Blood samples for PRL and CAB determination were taken at baseline and for 840 h thereafter (every 1 h up to 4 h, every 4 h up to 12 h, every 24 h up to 168 h, and weekly up to 5 weeks). Fractional urine collections for CAB excretion were taken immediately before drug administration, every 4 h up to 12 h, and every 12 h up to 168 h. During the study period, blood pressure and heart rate were monitored at the same time periods of plasma sampling for CAB, and electrocardiographic tracings and hematological evaluations were performed before and after each treatment period. All CAB doses (0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg) produced in all subjects a complete PRL suppression (PRL < 1.0 micrograms/L), that occurred earlier and persisted longer with the two higher doses. PRL secretion areas [area under the curve (AUC) 0-48 h and 48-840 h] were higher after 0.5-mg than after 1.0- and 1.5-mg doses. In particular, in the first portion of the area, the difference between 0.5 mg and both 1.0 and 1.5 mg was highly statistically significant (P < 0.01) without significant differences between the two highest doses. Mean CAB maximal plasma concentrations (Cmax) were 33.3 +/- 3.69, 40.3 +/- 2.49, and 67.0 +/- 9.79 ng/L after 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg CAB, respectively; time to Cmax was 2 h (median) for all doses; CAB AUC(0-168 h) after 0.5 mg CAB was significantly lower (P < 0.01) than after 1.5 mg CAB. The percentages of the administered doses of CAB excreted in urine were 1.1 +/- 0.1%, 1.1 +/- 0.1%, and 1.2 +/- 0.1% for the 0.5-, 1.0-, and 1.5 mg doses, respectively (P = NS). CAB AUCs(0-168 h) and Cmax normalized to the 1.0-mg dose were compared by two-way analysis of variance; no significant differences were found for CAB AUCs(0-168h); Cmax after 0.5 mg was significantly higher (P < 0.01) than after 1.0 and 1.5 mg CAB. A progressive decrease of systolic and diastolic blood pressure was observed, and symptomatic hypotension after the 1.0-mg dose did not allow one subject to receive the 1.5-mg dose. Other mild to moderate adverse events occurred only after 1.0 and 1.5 mg CAB. These results indicate that, in the dose range of 0.5-1.5 mg, the pharmacokinetics of CAB are dose independent, and that the pharmacodynamic data and the frequencies of adverse events of CAB are dose related, with no significant differences in the PRL-lowering effect of the 1.0- and 1.5-mg doses.

Acute pharmacologic blockade of lipolysis normalizes nocturnal growth hormone levels and pulsatility in obese subjects.

Obesity is associated with blunted growth hormone (GH) levels and pulsatility and elevated plasma free fatty acids (FFA) levels. To evaluate whether the two phenomena are correlated, in the present study we investigated the effects of an acute pharmacologic blockade of lipolysis on nocturnal GH levels and pulsatility in 10 obese and 10 control subjects. At 9 PM on two different nights with a 1-night interval in between, all subjects received either a single oral tablet of placebo or acipimox slow release (ACX-SR, 500 mg) in randomized order. Blood samples were drawn from 10 PM to 6 AM for evaluation of FFA, glycerol, GH, immunoreactive insulin (IRI), glucose, and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels. After placebo, FFA and glycerol levels were higher (P < .02) and GH levels, areas, peak amplitude, and peak increment (assessed by the Cluster algorithm) were lower in obese than in control subjects (P < .01). After ACX-SR, FFA and glycerol levels were reduced in both groups (P < .02 v placebo), and in obese subjects they became similar to those observed in control subjects after placebo. ACX-SR had no effect on GH levels and pulsatility in control subjects. GH levels, areas, peak, amplitude, peak increment, and interpeak valley levels were all increased after ACX-SR in obese subjects (P < .05 or less v placebo) and became similar to those observed in normal subjects after placebo, but no correlation was found between the reduction in FFA levels and the increase in GH levels and pulsatility.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Metabolic effects of graded glucagon infusions in man: inhibition of glucagon, insulin, and somatostatin response to arginine.

Insulin inhibits its own release (autofeedback), and growth hormone (GH) inhibits the GH response to a variety of stimuli. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether glucagon (G) can modify pancreatic G (IRG) release in humans. Seven healthy men received intravenous (i.v.) arginine (30 g in 30 minutes) 240 minutes after the beginning of a 0.9% NaCI saline infusion and a 2.5-, 4.0-, and 8.0-ng/kg.min-1 porcine G infusion, with each infusion lasting 360 minutes. All G infusions yielded stable and dose-related plasma IRG levels, and the 4.0- and 8.0-ng/kg.min-1 G infusions decreased plasma free fatty acids (FFA) and blood glycerol and beta-OH-butyrate levels and elicited insulin (IRI) release, and the 8.0-ng/kg.min-1 G infusion elicited GH release and increased blood glucose (BG) levels; somatostatin (SRIF) levels were not affected by G infusions. At 240 minutes, plasma IRG levels were higher during G infusion than during saline infusion, whereas serum IRI and BG levels had returned to preinfusion levels. At this point, G infusions decreased the integrated (240 to 300 minutes) IRG, IRI, BG, and SRIF responses, but not the GH response to arginine. These data indicate that prolonged G infusions decrease the IRG response to arginine; in addition, G decreases plasma FFA levels, and higher G doses stimulate IRI release and exert a self-limited hyperglycemic effect. The fact that the IRI response to arginine was decreased by G could be due to a refractoriness of beta cells to subsequent stimuli; the decreased SRIF response to arginine is likely due to G itself or to a decrease of plasma FFA levels.