One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification System in Comparison to the Intraoperative Frozen Section and Definitive Histological Examination Among Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Survival Study.

Simple Summary: Implementing intraoperative assessment of sentinel lymph nodes by one-step nucleic acid amplification in early breast cancer can reduce the surgical burden to the patient and the costs to the health system. However, only limited data are available in terms of long-term disease-free survival and overall survival. Therefore, this study aims to compare disease-free survival and overall survival between one-step nucleic acid amplification, frozen section, and definitive histology. These results could impact the healthcare community, adding further proof to the body of evidence supporting the broader adoption of this innovative technology that enables a safe reduction in patient surgical burden and healthcare costs. Background: The one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) system is a novel molecular technique, which consents to quick intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph node metastases by the amplification of cytokeratin 19 mRNA. Our study aims to evaluate the OSNA method in comparison with frozen section (FS) and definitive histological examination of the sentinel lymph node biopsy among early breast cancer patients considering disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: In this study, we included all women who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for breast cancers classified as TNM stage I and II in our center between January 2005 and January 2017, and the follow-up was collected up to January 2019. We divided patients among three groups based on SLNB evaluation: definitive histological examination, intra-operative FS, or OSNA. Results: We included 2412 SLNBs: 727 by definitive histological examination, 697 by FS, and 988 by OSNA. Isolated tumor cells were found in 2.32% of cases, micrometastasis in 9.12%, and macrometastases in 13.64%. Surgical procedure duration was significantly shorter in OSNA than in FS (42.1 minutes ±5.1 vs. 70.1 minutes ±10.5, p <0.05). No significant differences have been observed among the three groups regarding OS, DSF, cumulative local, or distant metastases. In particular 5-year DFS was 96.38% in definitive histology (95% C.I. 95.02-97.75%), 96.37% in FS (95% C.I. 94.98-97.78%), and 96.51% in OSNA group (95% C.I. 95.32-97.72%). Conclusions: No difference in OS and DFS was found comparing OSNA, FS, and definitive histology. Furthermore, reduced operative time was found in the OSNA group.

Impact of the presence and quantity of ductal carcinoma in situ component on the outcome of invasive breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The role of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) component on the outcome of invasive breast cancer is not yet completely clear. Our study aims to assess the impact of the presence and quantity of DCIS component on the outcome of patients operated for invasive breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We collected retrospective data about patients operated at their breast for invasive cancer between 2007 and 2012, focusing on the presence of DCIS component. Then, we divided patients into four groups based on the quantity of DCIS component as follows: not found (group A), minimal (group B, <25%), extensive (group C, 25-75%), and prevalent (group D, >75%). We further defined "extensive intraductal component" (EIC) groups C and D together. RESULTS: DCIS component was associated with young age, familial history of breast cancer and worse biological characteristics, including high grading, higher prevalence of Her2/Neu overexpression, hormone receptors negativity, comedo-like necrosis and multifocality/multicentricity. Despite the unfavorable prognostic factors, invasive cancers associated with EIC were frequently treated with radical surgery and resulted to have long disease-free survival and low local recurrence rate. In patients with DCIS component (groups B, C, and D) the extension of this component resulted indirectly correlated with local recurrence rate, tumor lymphovascular invasion, and lymphnode extracapsular invasion. The highest prevalence of local recurrences was found in group B, which tended to be less frequently treated with radical surgery than group D (P<0.05) and C (P=n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Different clinical and tumor features among invasive breast cancer with and without DCIS component indicate that they are distinct entities probably originating by different pathways that deserve to be studied. Furthermore, the controversial results about the management of cancer with minimal intraductal component require further studies in order to reduce local recurrence.

Therapeutic strategy for ductal carcinoma in situ patients according to Van Nuys Prognostic Index.

AIM: Evaluation of therapeutic strategy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) patients at our Brest Cancer Centre and analysis of our pattern of treatment with respect to Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI) cathegories. MATHERIAL OF STUDY: Our study population is the result of a selection of 85 DCIS patients classified according to the VNPI risk of Local Recurrence (LR). A comparison was made between treatment effectively performed and therapy suggested by VNPI protocols. RESULTS: Out of 53 DCIS women (62%) at low local recurrence risk, 5 patients underwent Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) alone, 7 were treated with mastectomy and 41 underwent BCS followed by radiotherapy (RT). Out of 31 patients (37%) belonging to VNPI intermediate risk group, 25 cases recived BCS+RT and 6 cases received mastectomy. Only one patient (1%) belonged to VNPI high risk group and underwent mastectomy. DISCUSSION: Only 31 patients (36,5%) had their definitive treatment according to recommended VNPI criteria, but none of the other 54 cases (63,5%) was undertreated. Performing mastectomy instead of BCS or adding adjuvant radiotherapy at BCS alone were not considered overtreatment because the therapeutic strategy was the result of a multidisciplinary discussion. CONCLUSION: As DCIS is a heterogeneus desease the one-size-fits-all approach to treatment seems inappropriate. The VNPI was developed in order to help treatment choices, but therapeutic strategies can't be based only on local recurrence risk and need a multidisciplinary approach. KEY WORDS: Breast cancer, Ductal carcinoma in situ, Van Nuys Prognostic Index.