Analysis of Avian Influenza (H5N5) Viruses Isolated in the Southwestern European Part of the Russian Federation in 2020-2021.

In 2021, several isolates of the H5N5 avian influenza virus (AIV) were detected in Europe and the Russian Federation, which differed from those detected in 2020. Genetic analysis revealed a relationship between the highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N5 subtype, detected in Europe, and some isolates detected in the Russian Federation territory in 2020-2021: it was shown that both originated in the Caspian Sea regions around the autumn of 2020. The appearance of H5N5 subtype viruses in the spring of 2021 in Europe and the Russian Federation was not associated with the mass migration of birds from Africa. The results of the analysis revealed the presence of a deletion in the stem of a neuraminidase between bp 139 and 204 (open reading frame). It has been shown that AIVs of the H5N5 subtype are capable of long-term circulation in wild bird populations with the possibility of reassortment. The results also highlighted the need for careful monitoring of the circulation of AIVs in the Caspian Sea region, the role of which, in the preservation and emergence of new antigenic variants of such viruses in Eurasia, is currently underestimated.

Biological characterization of Russian Mycoplasma gallisepticum field isolates.

An earlier study on commercial chickens and turkeys with a history of respiratory disease established Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection rates on 164 poultry farms of the Russian Federation. Forty-seven (29%) of these poultry farms were M. gallisepticum-positive by polymerase chain reaction but isolation of the mycoplasma was successful only on 10 farms. Five field isolates from different farms were selected for pathogenicity studies in specific pathogen-free chicks. Clinical signs, seroconversion, culture rates, air sac and tracheal lesions and mean tracheal mucosal thickness were all assessed in comparison with the reference strain, S6. Of the five isolates, MG140905 and MG070607 appeared to be slightly more pathogenic than the other three, as indicated by clinical signs, culture-positive rates and lesions, but only isolate MG140905 differed statistically (P < 0.05) from them, thus proving to be the most pathogenic. However, none of the Russian field isolates was as pathogenic as the S6 strain by the parameters measured. Stress or other factors such as concurrent bacterial or viral infections may have served as exacerbating factors for the disease seen in the naturally affected flocks. Sequence analysis of the gapA and mgc2 genes showed that MG140905 clustered with M. gallisepticum R(low) and was more distant from the majority of the Russian isolates.