Transendocardial CD34+ Cell Therapy does not Increase the Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are of major concern in the field of cell therapy, potentially limiting its safety and efficacy. We sought to investigate the effects of CD34+ cell therapy on VA burden in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). We performed registry data analysis of patients with CHF and implanted ICD/CRT devices treated with transendocardial CD 34+ cell therapy. Demographic, echocardiographic, and biochemical parameters were analyzed. Device records were reviewed and the number and type of VA 1 year prior to and 1 year after cell therapy were analyzed. All patients underwent electroanatomical mapping, and myocardial scar was defined as unipolar voltage (UV) <8.3 mV and linear local shortening (LLS) <6%. Of 209 patients screened, 48 met inclusion criteria. The mean age of the patients was 52 years and 88% were male. Nonischemic and ischemic cardiomyopathy were present in 55% and 45% of patients. The average serum creatinine was 91±26 µmol/L, serum bilirubin 18±9 µmol/L, NT-proBNP 1767 (468, 2446) pg/mL, LVEF 27±9% and 6' walk test 442±123 m. The average scar burden in patients with nonischemic and ischemic DCM was 58±15% and 51±25% (P=0.48). No significant difference in VA burden was observed before and after cell therapy (48% vs. 44%; P=0.68). ICD activation occurred in 19% and 27% of patients before and after cell therapy (P=0.33). According to our results, transendocardial CD34+ cell therapy does not appear to increase the risk of VA in chronic heart failure patients.

Stem Cell Therapy in Patients with Chronic Nonischemic Heart Failure.

AIM OF THE REVIEW: The aim of this review is to discuss recent advances in clinical aspects of stem cell therapy in chronic nonischemic heart failure (DCMP) with emphasis on patient selection, stem cell types, and delivery methods. RECENT FINDINGS: Several stem cell types have been considered for the treatment of DCMP patients. Bone marrow-derived cells and CD34+ cells have been demonstrated to improve myocardial performance, functional capacity, and neurohumoral activation. Furthermore, allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells were also shown to be effective in improving heart function in this patient population; this may represent an important step towards the development of a standardized stem cell product for widespread clinical use in patients with DCMP. SUMMARY: The trials of stem cell therapy in DCMP patients have shown some promising results, thus making DCMP apparently more inviting target for stem cell therapy than chronic ischemic heart failure, where studies to date failed to demonstrate a consistent effect of stem cells on myocardial performance. Future stem cell strategies should aim for more personalized therapeutic approach by establishing the optimal stem cell type or their combination, dose, and delivery method for an individual patient adjusted for patient's age and stage of the disease.

Electroanatomic Properties of the Myocardium Predict Response to CD34+ Cell Therapy in Patients With Ischemic and Nonischemic Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: We investigated a correlation between electromechanical properties of the myocardium and response to CD34+ cell therapy in patients with chronic heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 40 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and 40 with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). All patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III and had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%. CD34+ cells were mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and collected via apheresis. Electroanatomic mapping was performed to define areas of myocardial scar and hibernation, and CD34+ cells were injected transendocardially in the hibernating areas. Patient were followed for 6 months; responders were defined as patients with LVEF increase of >5%. At baseline, the groups did not differ in sex, LVEF, creatinine, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide or electroanatomic parameters (scar area: 53 ± 18% in ICM vs 55 ± 23% in DCM [P = .83]; hibernating area: 23 ± 13% vs 22 ± 12% [P = .56]). At 6 months we found similar rates of responders in both groups (60% in ICM vs 65% in DCM [P = .95]). When compared with nonresponders, responders had less myocardial scar (47 ± 17% vs 58 ± 15% [P = .003]). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic heart failure due to ICM and DCM we observed similar electroanatomic properties of the myocardium. In both groups, lower myocardial scar burden was associated with better clinical response to CD34+ cell therapy.

Use of a totally artificial heart for a complex postinfarction ventricular septal defect.

The incidence of cardiac rupture complicating myocardial infarction has declined since the introduction of thrombolytic therapy. Despite the advances in the management of myocardial infarction, cardiac rupture remains an important cause of death among infarction-related fatalities. We discuss a patient who presented to our hospital with myocardial infarction and who subsequently developed a complex ventricular septal rupture, for which surgical repair was not feasible. Implantation of a CardioWest Total Artificial Heart (SynCardia Systems) allowed for immediate hemodynamic stabilization and served as a bridge to transplantation.