Histological predictors of renal outcome in lupus nephritis: the importance of tubulointerstitial lesions and scoring of glomerular lesions.

Introduction Lupus nephritis (LN) affects nearly 60% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and up to 30% of them will progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), despite receiving aggressive immunosuppressive therapy. The prognostic value of ISN/RPS classification is controversial. Therefore, we aimed to identify clinical and pathological predictors of outcome in LN patients independent of this classification. Material and methods Thirty-seven patients with LN who underwent percutaneous kidney biopsy between 1997 and 2016 were included in this study. Twenty clinical and twenty histological variables were tested for their association with a composite end-point of doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD and death. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were performed to identify independent predictors of outcome. Results During a median follow-up period of 48 months (IQR: 17.5-120 months), 21.6% of patients reached the composite end-point. The overall survival rate of our cohort was 89% at one year, 86% at five years, 74% at 10 years and 64% at 20 years. Patients with Class IV LN showed the worst prognosis with 44% survival at 10 years, while those who additionally showed crescents and global sclerosis on kidney biopsy had an even lower survival of 21% and 0% at 10 years, respectively. After multivariate adjustment, we identified estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline (HR, 0.91 per ml/min /1.73 m2; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.99), 24-hour proteinuria at baseline (HR, 2.04 per g/d; 95% CI, 1.19 to 3.5), crescents (HR, 1.068 per %; 95% CI, 1.003 to 1.091), global sclerosis (HR, 1.036 per %; 95% CI, 0.984 to 1.091), presence of adhesions (HR, 9.2; 95% CI, 1.38 to 61.2) and tubulitis (HR, 13.1; 95% CI; 1.3 to 131) as independent predictors of outcome in our cohort of LN. Conclusions Our study identified glomerular (crescents, global sclerosis, adhesions) and tubulointerstitial (tubulitis) lesions, in addition to clinical variables (renal function, 24-hour proteinuria), as important predictors of renal outcome, independent of the ISN/RPS classification. We suggest that the ISN/RPS classification could be improved by a quantitative assessment of glomeruli with active and chronic lesions and by a greater emphasis given to tubulointerstitial lesions.

[Insulinoma of the pancreas: analysis of a clinical series of 30 cases]. / Insulinomul pancreatic--analiza unei serii clinice de 30 de cazuri.

UNLABELLED: Insulinoma is the most frequent neuroendocrine pancreatic tumor and is the main cause for hypoglicemia due to endogenous hyperinsulinism. We performed an analysis of a clinical series in order to study the clinical and biological spectrum of presentation, the preoperatory imagistic diagnosis and results of the surgical approach. Between 1986-2009, 30 patients with symptoms suggesting an insulinoma were hospitalized in our department. Preoperatory localization of insulinomas was possible in 16 patients. The most sensitive imagistic methods were ecoendoscopy and magnetic resonance. Intraoperatory ultrasound was performed in 16 patients and its sensitivity in detection of insulinomas was 93%; the combination between intraoperative ultrasound and manual exploration of pancreas by the surgeon reached a 100% sensitivity. Before the intraoperatory ultrasound was used the tumor excision was predominantly done by extensive pancreatic resection, while after this was available in our centre more conservative (enucleo-resection) procedures were chosen. In 1 patient the resection was done by laparoscopy, and in 1 patient by robotic surgery. The dimensions of the tumor were less than 2 cm in most of the patients; 2 had nesidioblastosis and 2 had multiple insulinomas; all 28 patients proved to have benign insulinomas at histological specimens. Following surgery, the symptoms disappear in all patients. The most common complication following extensive pancreatic resections was acute pancreatitis, while after enucleation pancreatic fistula occurred more frequently. CONCLUSIONS: Due to small dimensions, the preoperative diagnosis of insulinomas is usually difficult, ecoendoscopy being the most sensitive method. Intraoperative ultrasound is essential for insulinoma localization and for chosing the optimal type of excision. Enucleation is the resection method to be chosen whenever this it is technical possible. In benign insulinomas the prognosis is excellent, surgical resection being curative in all cases.