Improved Clinical Outcomes With Dynamic, Force-Controlled, Gap-Balancing in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Optimal soft-tissue management in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may reduce symptomatic instability. We hypothesized that TKA outcomes using a computer-assisted dynamic ligament balancer that acquires medial and lateral gap sizes throughout the motion arc would show improved Knee Society Scores (KSS) compared to TKAs done with a traditional tensioner at 0 and 90°. We also sought to quantify the degree to which the planned femoral rotation chosen to optimize medio-lateral balance throughout the arc of motion deviated from the femoral rotation needed to achieve a rectangular flexion gap at 90° alone. METHODS: Baseline demographics, clinical outcomes, KSSs, and femoral rotations were compared in 100 consecutive, computer-assisted TKAs done with the balancer (balancer group) to the immediately prior 100 consecutive computer-assisted TKAs done without the balancer (control group). Minimum follow-up was 13 months and all patients had osteoarthritis. Mean knee motion did not differ preoperatively (110.1 ± 13.6° balancer, 110.4 ± 12.5° control, P = .44) or postoperatively (119.1 ± 10.3° balancer, 118.8 ± 10.9° control, P = .42). Tourniquet times did not differ (93.1 ± 13.0 minutes balancer, 90.7 ± 13.0 minutes control, P = .13). Postoperative length of stay differed (40.2 ± 20.9 hours balancer, 49.0 ± 18.3 hours control, P = .0009). There were 14 readmissions (7 balancer, 7 control), 11 adverse events (4 balancer, 7 control), and 3 manipulations (1 balancer, 2 control). The cohorts were compared using Student's t-tests, Shapiro-Wilk normalities, Wilcoxon rank-sums, and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Postoperative KSS improvements were higher in the balancer group (P < .0001). In multivariable regression analyses, the balancer group experienced 7 ± 2 point improvement in KSS Knee scores (P < .0001) and 4 ± 2 point improvement in KSS Function scores (P = .040) compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The statistically and clinically significant improvements in postoperative KSS demonstrated in the balancer cohort are likely driven by improved stability throughout the motion arc. Further study is warranted to evaluate replicability by non-design surgeons.

Gap Balancing Throughout the Arc of Motion With Navigated TKA and a Novel Force-Controlled Distractor: A Review of the First 273 Cases.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the ability to achieve the targeted soft-tissue balance in terms of medio-lateral (ML) laxity and gap values when using a computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) system featuring an intra-articular force-controlled distractor and assessed learning curves associated with the adoption of this technology. METHODS: The first 273 cases using this technology were reported without exclusions comparing 1) final ML laxity and 2) final average gap to their predefined targets. For both parameters, the signed and unsigned differentials were reported. The linear mixed model was used to evaluate laxity curve differences between surgeons. A cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) was applied to assess surgeon learning curves regarding surgical time. RESULTS: Both the average signed ML laxity and gap differentials were neutral throughout the full arc of motion. Both the average unsigned ML laxity and gap differentials were linear. Signature of ML laxity and gap differential curves tended to be surgeon-specific. The CUSUM analyses of surgical times demonstrated either a short learning curve or the absence of a discernible learning pattern for surgeons. CONCLUSION: Data from all users involved with the pilot release of the balancing device were considered to capture variability in familiarity with the technique and learning curve cases were included. A high ability to achieve targeted gap balance throughout the arc of motion using the proposed method was observed.

Intraoperative knee kinematics measured by computer-assisted navigation and intraoperative ligament balance have the potential to predict postoperative knee kinematics.

This study was designed to analyze the effects of type of activity and cruciate ligament resection on knee kinematics and ligament balance after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to determine if intraoperative passive kinematics are associated with active kinematics. Fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were examined. The knees were mounted on a quadriceps-driven simulator. Cruciate-retaining (CR-TKA) and posterior-substituting (PS-TKA) TKA was performed using a contemporary knee system. Active flexion (closed-kinetic chain [CKC] and open-kinetic-chain [OKC]) and passive flexion were analyzed by recording the knee kinematics using a specifically developed application of an imageless navigation system. An electronic ligament balancer was used to measure the tibiofemoral gap under constant distraction pressure. The femur rotated externally relative to the tibia during passive and active CKC flexion. The femur translated anteriorly from 10° to 50° of flexion after TKA. Beyond 50° of flexion, the femur translated posteriorly in all surgical conditions. The femoral location during active CKC flexion was posterior relative to that during active OKC. Femoral rotation and translation during passive knee flexion correlated significantly with that during active knee flexion. Posterior tilt of the electronic ligament balancer was greater with CR-TKA than with PS-TKA and correlated significantly with the anteroposterior position of the femur. Statement of Clinical Significance: Intraoperative knee kinematics measured by computer-assisted navigation and intraoperative ligament balance have the potential to predict postoperative knee kinematics.

Accuracy and precision in resection alignment: Insights from 10,144 clinical cases using a contemporary computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty system.

BACKGROUND: Studies on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) are limited by sample size or overlooked longitudinal performance of the system. This study aimed to assess resection accuracy across the entire TKA application history of a modern CAOS system considering multiple factors. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed based on a database that archives technical logs of all TKAs performed using a CAOS system. Coronal resection errors and percentage of outliers (<2° alignment error) in the proximal tibia and distal femur were assessed. Multilevel modeling was used to understand whether and where the resection error variability was located in the grouping categories, which included geographic region, individual established surgeon, preoperative alignment, adoption phase (learning/proficient), and version of the CAOS software application. RESULTS: A total of 10,144 cases were reviewed. The accuracy (mean) and precision (standard deviation) of the coronal alignment for both the tibia and femur were at the sub-degree level. High percentages of acceptable resections were observed across the pooled and each grouping category. The accountability for the amounts of total variability in tibial and femoral resection errors was negligible for all grouping categories, demonstrated by ICC values less than the common variations in observational studies. CONCLUSIONS: The study applied advanced analyses to assess alignment outcome in TKA bony resection alignment across the history of a specific CAOS system. The results demonstrated high resection alignment accuracy insensitive to geographic region, CAOS software application, adoption phase, preoperative alignment, and inter-surgeon differences.

Posterior tibial slope impacts intraoperatively measured mid-flexion anteroposterior kinematics during cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Posterior tibial slope (PTS) for cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is usually pre-determined by the surgeon. Limited information is available comparing different choices of PTS on the kinematics of the CR TKA, independent of the balancing of the extension gap. This study hypothesized that with the same balanced extension gap, the choice of PTS significantly impacts the intraoperatively measured kinematics of CR TKA. METHODS: Navigated CR TKAs were performed on seven fresh-frozen cadavers with healthy knees and intact posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). A custom designed tibial baseplate was implanted to allow in situ modification of the PTS, which altered the flexion gap but maintained the extension gap. Knee kinematics were measured by performing passive range of motion (ROM) tests from full extension to 120° of flexion on the intact knee and CR TKAs with four different PTSs (1°, 4°, 7°, and 10°). The measured kinematics were compared across test conditions to assess the impact of PTS. RESULTS: With a consistent extension gap, the change of PTS had significant impact on the anteroposterior (AP) kinematics of the CR TKA knees in mid-flexion range (45°-90°), but not so much for the high-flexion range (90°-120°). No considerable impacts were found on internal/external (I/E) rotation and hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle. However, the findings on the individual basis suggested the impact of PTS on I/E rotation and HKA angle may be patient-specific. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggested that the choice of PTS had the greatest impact on the mid-flexion AP translation among the intraoperatively measured kinematics. This impact may be considered while making surgical decisions in the context of AP kinematics. When using a tibial component designed with "center" pivoting PTS, a surgeon may be able to fine tune the PTS to achieve proper mid-flexion AP stability.

A soft-tissue preserving method for evaluating the impact of posterior tibial slope on kinematics during cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: A validation study.

BACKGROUND: The reconstructed posterior tibial slope (PTS) plays a significant role in restoring knee kinematics in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. However, conventional methods for the investigation of PTS can be limited by sample size or prone to errors due to damages to the bone and/or soft tissues. The purpose of this study was to validate a novel method for the evaluation of the effects of PTS on knee kinematics. METHODS: Seven computer-assisted cruciate-retaining TKAs were performed by two surgeons on healthy cadaveric knees. The implanted tibial baseplates allowed precise and easy modification of the PTS in situ. Knee kinematics were evaluated during passive full range of motion test. The evaluation was performed three times at each of the five PTSs in the order of 10°, seven degrees, four degrees, one degree, and back to ten degrees. The variability of the repeated measurements, inter-surgeon variation of the data, and test reproducibility were investigated. RESULTS: The test method was shown to be highly repeatable (low root-mean-squared errors) and has low sensitivity to surgeon variability (ANOVA). No statistical difference was found in the knee kinematics between the first and last measurements at 10° PTS (paired t-test). CONCLUSION: The results suggested that the developed method can be used to investigate the impact of PTS on knee kinematics without disrupting the soft-tissue environment of the knee. The use of the novel tibial baseplate allowed for adjusting the PTS without re-cutting the tibia and removing the components. The method may be applied to improve the future investigation of PTS.

Corrigendum to "Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of a Next Generation Computer-Assisted Surgical System".

[This corrects the article on p. 225 in vol. 7, PMID: 26217470.].

Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of a Next Generation Computer-Assisted Surgical System.

BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery (CAOS) improves accuracy and reduces outliers in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, during the evaluation of CAOS systems, the error generated by the guidance system (hardware and software) has been generally overlooked. Limited information is available on the accuracy and precision of specific CAOS systems with regard to intraoperative final resection measurements. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and precision of a next generation CAOS system and investigate the impact of extra-articular deformity on the system-level errors generated during intraoperative resection measurement. METHODS: TKA surgeries were performed on twenty-eight artificial knee inserts with various types of extra-articular deformity (12 neutral, 12 varus, and 4 valgus). Surgical resection parameters (resection depths and alignment angles) were compared between postoperative three-dimensional (3D) scan-based measurements and intraoperative CAOS measurements. Using the 3D scan-based measurements as control, the accuracy (mean error) and precision (associated standard deviation) of the CAOS system were assessed. The impact of extra-articular deformity on the CAOS system measurement errors was also investigated. RESULTS: The pooled mean unsigned errors generated by the CAOS system were equal or less than 0.61 mm and 0.64° for resection depths and alignment angles, respectively. No clinically meaningful biases were found in the measurements of resection depths (< 0.5 mm) and alignment angles (< 0.5°). Extra-articular deformity did not show significant effect on the measurement errors generated by the CAOS system investigated. CONCLUSIONS: This study presented a set of methodology and workflow to assess the system-level accuracy and precision of CAOS systems. The data demonstrated that the CAOS system investigated can offer accurate and precise intraoperative measurements of TKA resection parameters, regardless of the presence of extra-articular deformity in the knee.

Reconstructing proximal humeral fractures using the bicipital groove as a landmark.

Controversy persists in the literature regarding the use of the bicipital groove as an anatomic landmark to restore humeral head retroversion when treating complex proximal humeral fractures with arthroplasty. We quantified the three-dimensional geometry of the bicipital groove in 49 dried humeri relative to the intramedullary axis, quantified the reliability of using the bicipital groove as an anatomic landmark, and compared this reliability with that of the conventional technique that uses a fixed, average angle relative to the epicondylar axis to establish humeral head retroversion. The data show the anterior offset of the bicipital groove is nearly constant from proximal (7.3 mm +/- 2.8 mm) to distal (7.2 mm +/- 1.5 mm) relative to the intramedullary axis. Given the consistency, the distal bicipital groove (at the level of the surgical neck) is a reasonable landmark to establish humeral head retroversion after complex proximal humeral fractures having reliability (angular error of 7.9 degrees +/- 5.8 degrees) as good as or better than the conventional fixed-angle technique.