Asparaginase therapy in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: expert opinion on use and toxicity management.

The addition of asparaginase to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) treatment regimens provides significant patient benefits. Asparaginase therapies vary in origin (Escherichia coli- or Erwinia-derived) and preparation (native or pegylated), conferring distinct pharmacokinetic and immunogenic profiles. Clinical hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) are commonly reported in patients and range from localized erythema to systemic anaphylaxis. Due to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile and reduced immunogenicity compared to native E. coli preparations, pegaspargase is the first-line asparaginase therapeutic option. Switching to an Erwinia-derived asparaginase is recommended for patients who experience HSRs or antibody-mediated inactivation to achieve the significant clinical benefit observed in patients who complete asparaginase treatment. Previous global shortages of asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi necessitated conversion mitigation strategies such as premedication protocols, desensitization, and asparaginase activity level monitoring. Here, we discuss the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, current use, and administration of asparaginase therapies for pediatric and adolescent patients with ALL/LBL.

Risk Factors for Development of Pneumatosis Intestinalis after Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Single-Center Case-Control Study.

The significance of pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) in pediatric patients following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is poorly understood. A knowledge gap remains with respect to the etiology, risk factors, and evidence-based treatment of these patients. As a result, management is frequently based on each center's clinical practice, without standardization across treatment centers. In this single-center trial, we aimed to validate both previously proposed and additional risk factors for the development of PI and to examine our management and outcomes for these patients. We performed a retrospective case-control study examining risk factors for the development of PI in pediatric HSCT patients at a single tertiary referral children's hospital. We used univariate and multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis to explore differences in pharmacologic and other transplantation-specific risk factors. Between 2012 and 2019, PI was diagnosed in 212 patients at our pediatric hospital, of whom 42 were HSCT recipients. The majority of patients (88%; n = 37 of 42) with PI were diagnosed by X-ray. Eighteen patients (43%) were asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally after imaging was obtained for standard post-transplantation surveillance or other nonrelated indications. All patients with PI were hospitalized and placed on strict bowel rest while receiving parenteral nutrition and antibiotics. Recurrence of PI occurred in 4 patients (10%) following their initial diagnosis. Increased doses of steroid exposure within 30 days of PI diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 5.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1 to 15.3; P = .0006), presence of grade II-IV gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 28.1; P = .05), and receipt of >50% of total daily nutrition by nasogastric (NG) tube feeds (OR, 22.0; 95% CI, 1.3 to 370.2; P = .03) were identified as independent risk factors for the development of PI. Intensity of the conditioning regimen, exposure to total body irradiation, stem cell source, donor type, HLA matching, use of mycophenolate mofetil, and presence of bacterial or viral infection at the time of PI diagnosis were not demonstrably associated with the development of PI in our study. We conclude that development of asymptomatic PI is a benign condition following HSCT, and that the risk for PI is increased in patients with gastrointestinal GVHD, patients receiving steroid therapy, and patients relying on supplemental NG tube feeds for at least one-half of their total daily nutrition.

Toxicity assessment of concurrent gabapentin/pregabalin administration with high-dose melphalan in autologous hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

A theoretical pharmacokinetic interaction mediated through L-amino acid transporter 1 and 2 exists between gabapentin (GP) and pregabalin (PG) with melphalan. Peripheral neuropathy is a common toxicity of various multiple myeloma regimens commonly utilized prior to autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (auto-HCT) with high-dose melphalan (HD-Mel). Therefore, it is likely concurrent administration of either GP or PG will occur in patients receiving HD-Mel conditioning for auto-HCT, which could potentially increase cellular uptake and worsen the mucosal injury. A retrospective chart review of adult patients from January 2012 to July 2016 who received HD-Mel (140-200 mg/m2) at West Virginia University Medicine was performed to assess toxicity and outcomes in these patients. A total of 80 patients were included in the study, with 30 patients receiving GP or PG and 50 control patients. There were no significant differences in grade 2 or higher mucositis, admissions for nausea/vomiting/diarrhea, intravenous opioid requirements, oral topical therapies, antidiarrheal medication use, rescue anti-emetics, days of nausea or vomiting, pain scores, neutrophil or platelet engraftment, treatment-related mortality, progression-free survival, or overall survival. Our data suggest that it is safe to continue GP/PG therapy throughout HD-Mel therapy, with no negative transplant outcomes. Prospective studies or evaluations of larger databases are necessary to better characterize the clinical effect of concomitant therapy.