A close look at therapist contributions to narrative-emotion shifting in a case illustration of brief dynamic therapy.

Objective: In a secondary analysis of Friedlander et al.'s [(2018). "If those tears could talk, what would they say?" multi-method analysis of a corrective experience in brief dynamic therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 28, 217-234. doi:10.1080/10503307.2016.1184350] case study of Hanna Levenson's Brief Dynamic Therapy over Time (from APA's Psychotherapy in Six Sessions DVD series), we re-visited the Narrative-Emotion Process Coding (Angus, L. E., Boritz, T., Bryntwick, E., Carpenter, N., Macaulay, C., & Khattra, J. (2017). The Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System 2.0: A multi-methodological approach to identifying and assessing narrative-emotion process markers in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 27, 253-269. doi:10.1080/10503307.2016.1238525) to identify specific therapist behaviors that may have facilitated the client's movement from expressing mostly Problem markers in early sessions to expressing considerably more Transition and Change markers in later sessions. Method: Using open coding and constant comparison qualitative methods, we identified Levenson's behaviors immediately preceding the client's "change shifts" (Problem → Transition/Change and Transition → Change) and "problem shifts" (Transition/Change → Problem). Results: Compared to problem shifts, change shifts were preceded by more therapist behavior reflecting Attaching New Meaning (e.g., linking the client's self-deprecation to her avoidant behavior) and Exploring/Expanding emotions (e.g., inviting the client to give voice to her tears), cognitions (e.g., pointing out the client's self-talk) and motivation (e.g., reflecting on the client's dissatisfaction with her defenses). Conclusions: In this successful case, facilitative therapist behavior reflected common therapeutic responses (e.g., validating the client's perspective) as well as responses characteristic of brief dynamic therapy (e.g., interpreting the client's defenses) and the therapist's personal style (e.g., repeating the client's words for emphasis).

The Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System 2.0: A multi-methodological approach to identifying and assessing narrative-emotion process markers in psychotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies suggest that it is not simply the expression of emotion or emotional arousal in session that is important, but rather it is the reflective processing of emergent, adaptive emotions, arising in the context of personal storytelling and/or Emotion-Focused Therapy (EFT) interventions, that is associated with change. METHOD: To enhance narrative-emotion integration specifically in EFT, Angus and Greenberg originally identified a set of eight clinically derived narrative-emotion integration markers were originally identified for the implementation of process-guiding therapeutic responses. Further evaluation and testing by the Angus Narrative-Emotion Marker Lab resulted in the identification of 10 empirically validated Narrative-Emotion Process (N-EP) markers that are included in the Narrative-Emotion Process Coding System Version 2.0 (NEPCS 2.0). RESULTS: Based on empirical research findings, individual markers are clustered into Problem (e.g., stuckness in repetitive story patterns, over-controlled or dysregulated emotion, lack of reflectivity), Transition (e.g., reflective, access to adaptive emotions and new emotional plotlines, heightened narrative and emotion integration), and Change (e.g., new story outcomes and self-narrative discovery, and co-construction and re-conceptualization) subgroups. To date, research using the NEPCS 2.0 has investigated the proportion and pattern of narrative-emotion markers in Emotion-Focused, Client-Centered, and Cognitive Therapy for Major Depression, Motivational Interviewing plus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and EFT for Complex Trauma. Results have consistently identified significantly higher proportions of N-EP Transition and Change markers, and productive shifts, in mid- and late phase sessions, for clients who achieved recovery by treatment termination. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery is consistently associated with client storytelling that is emotionally engaged, reflective, and evidencing new story outcomes and self-narrative change. Implications for future research, practice and training are discussed.

Assessing client self-narrative change in emotion-focused therapy of depression: an intensive single case analysis.

Personality researchers use the term self-narrative to refer to the development of an overall life story that places life events in a temporal sequence and organizes them in accordance to overarching themes. In turn, it is often the case that clients seek out psychotherapy when they can no longer make sense of their life experiences, as a coherent story. Angus and Greenberg (L. Angus and L. Greenberg, 2011, Working with narrative in emotion-focused therapy: Changing stories, healing lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press) view the articulation and consolidation of an emotionally integrated self-narrative account as an important part of the therapeutic change process that is essential for sustained change in emotion-focused therapy of depression. The purpose of the present study was to investigate client experiences of change, and self-narrative reconstruction, in the context of one good outcome emotion-focused therapy dyad drawn from the York II Depression Study. Using the Narrative Assessment Interview (NAI) method, client view of self and experiences of change were assessed at three points in time--after session one, at therapy termination, and at 6 months follow-up. Findings emerging from an intensive narrative theme analyses of the NAI transcripts--and 1 key therapy session identified by the client--are reported and evidence for the contributions of narrative and emotion processes to self-narrative change in emotion-focused therapy of depression are discussed. Finally, the implications of assessing clients' experiences of self-narrative change for psychotherapy research and practice are addressed.

Therapist empathy and client anxiety reduction in motivational interviewing: "She carries with me, the experience".

In this article, we examine the use of motivational interviewing (MI) to treat generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) by means of case illustration that focuses on four categories drawn from the client's experience of the key ingredients in MI therapy. The case illustration, drawn from the York study on combining MI and cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of GAD (uses the client's pre- and post-therapy narrative interviews) to arrive at categories representative of the client's experience of MI therapy. The results of the qualitative analysis highlight the key contributions to positive client outcomes and readiness for change in brief MI therapy for GAD.