[French Expert advice on the management of valproate in childbearing and pregnant women with bipolar disorder]. / Avis d'experts français sur la prise en charge des femmes en âge de procréer et enceintes souffrant d'un trouble bipolaire traitées par valproate.

INTRODUCTION: The perinatal period is associated with high risk of relapses in women with untreated bipolar disorder (BD) and can have significant consequences on foetal and child development. Valproate is an effective mood stabilizer in BD but it is also the anticonvulsant associated to the highest risks of neurodevelopmental disorders and congenital malformations. The National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM) changed the conditions of use and prescription of valproate in France in 2015. Its prescription is now contraindicated (i.e., not to be prescribed) in women able to have children unless alternative treatments are ineffective or not tolerated. Moreover, valproate could only be prescribed if the protocol of a specific pregnancy prevention program is followed. METHODS: A panel of experts from the French Association for Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology (AFPBN) provided consensus-based recommendations for switching and discontinuation of valproate in women with BD. The development of these recommendations consisted of an adaptation to French clinical practice based on a European expert opinion published in 2019. The experts discussed five real-world clinical situations in light of the scientific evidence and their clinical experience (a. Stable BD patient with valproate monotherapy who is planning pregnancy, b. Stable BD patient with valproate polytherapy who is planning pregnancy, c. Unstable BD patient with frequent relapses and valproate polytherapy who is planning pregnancy, d. Stable BD patient treated with valproate and unexpected pregnancy, e. Unstable BD patient treated with valproate and unexpected pregnancy) and developed, through several rounds of exchange drafts, a French version of clinical recommendations. RESULTS: First of all, some factors need to be considered for establishing personalized practical recommendations for a safe and effective switching or discontinuation of valproate in any clinical situations: planned pregnancy or unplanned pregnancy or current pregnancy, the existence or not of a pregnancy risk minimization program and a complete treatment history. Other factors that should be considered are the predominant polarity, the severity, the stability, the comorbidities associated with BD, the beliefs toward treatments, the family situation and the preference of the patient. The modalities for switching or discontinuation of valproate in women with BD were related to the clinical situation. First-line therapeutic alternatives such as lithium, lamotrigine, quetiapine, olanzapine or aripiprazole were preferred for patients suffering from a clinically stable BD considering pregnancy or pregnant. In patients suffering from clinically unstable BD, to reach stability was considered first. A shared decision-making should be systematically implemented and the patient must be fully informed of the risks related to an in-utero exposure to valproate, and the risks of the discontinuation/switch that is considered. CONCLUSION: Although the adaptation to French practice of the recommendations from the European expert opinion highlighted some differences in the criteria taken into consideration to guide the therapeutic decision, this expert advice will guide the clinician for switching and discontinuation of valproate in BD women able to have children or pregnant.

COVID-19 inpatients with psychiatric disorders: Real-world clinical recommendations from an expert team in consultation-liaison psychiatry.

BACKGROUND: The management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with comorbid psychiatric disorders poses several challenges, especially regarding drug interactions. METHODS: We report three representative case-scenarios on patients with psychiatric disorders and COVID-19 to provide a practical approach based on the existing literature and the clinical experience of an expert team in consultation-liaison psychiatry. CASE-CENTERED RECOMMENDATIONS: Psychopharmacological ongoing treatments should be prioritized and most doses should be reduced 25-50% of original dose if the patient receives lopinavir/ritonavir, with some exceptions including quetiapine, asenapine, olanzapine, sertraline, lamotrigine, bupropion, and methadone. If the psychopharmacological usual doses are in the low-to-median range levels, a dose change during COVID-19 drugs co-administration is not recommended, but only ECG and clinical monitoring of adverse effects and drug levels if required. Furthermore, when introducing a psychopharmacological drug, dose titration should be progressive, with ECG monitoring if cardiotoxic interactions are present. (A) In agitated delirium, olanzapine is recommended as first-line antipsychotic and quetiapine should be avoided. (B) In severe mental illness (SMI), essential treatments should be maintained. (C) In non-SMI with depressive/anxiety symptoms, psychological support should be provided and symptoms identified and treated. LIMITATIONS: Most recommendations on pharmacological interactions provide only a limited qualitative approach and quantitative recommendations are lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with psychiatric disorders and COVID-19 should be managed on a personalized basis considering several clinical criteria and, should not be excluded from receiving COVID-19 treatments. Risks of pharmacological interaction are not absolute and should be contextualized, and most psychopharmacological treatments should include an ECG with special attention to QTc interval.

Lithium and suicide prevention in mood disorders and in the general population: A systematic review.

Suicide contributes to 1-4 % of deaths worldwide every year. We conducted a systematic review aimed at summarizing evidence on the use of lithium for the prevention of suicide risk both in mood disorders and in the general population. We followed the PRISMA methodology (keywords: "lithium", "suicide" AND "suicidal" on Pubmed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Clinicaltrial.gov, other databases). Inclusion criteria: lithium therapy in mood disorder or found in drinking water or scalp in the general population. Exclusion criteria: no lithium administration. From 918 screened references, 18 prospective (number of participants: 153786), 10 retrospective (number of participants: 61088) and 16 ecological studies (total sample: 2062) were included. Most of the observational studies reported a reduction in suicide in patients with mood disorders. All studies about lithium treatment's duration reported that long-term lithium give more benefits than short-term lithium in suicide risk The evidence seems to attribute an intrinsic anti-suicidal property of lithium, independent of its proven efficacy as a mood stabilizer.

Unravelling potential severe psychiatric repercussions on healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 crisis.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak is putting healthcare professionals, especially those in the frontline, under extreme pressures, with a high risk of experiencing physical exhaustion, psychological disturbances, stigmatization, insomnia, depression and anxiety. We report the case of a general practitioner, without relevant somatic or psychiatric history that experienced a "brief reactive psychosis (298.8)" under stressful circumstances derived from COVID-19. She presented with delusional ideas of catastrophe regarding the current pandemic situation, delusions of self-reference, surveillance and persecution, with high affective and behavioural involvement. Physical examination and all further additional investigations did not reveal any secondary causes. She was administered olanzapine 10 mg with significant psychopathological improvement being later discharged with indications to maintain the treatment. To our knowledge this is the first reported case of severe mental illness in a healthcare professional without previous psychiatric history due to COVID-19 outbreak. Around 85% of patients presenting a brief psychotic disorder will develop a potentially disabling serious psychotic illness in the long-term. This case represents the potentially serious mental health consequences on healthcare professionals throughout the COVID-19 crisis and emphasizes the need to implement urgent measures to maintain staff mental health during the current pandemic.

How to treat mania.

OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we aimed at reviewing evidence-based treatment options for bipolar mania and proposed tentative evidence-based clinical suggestions regarding the management of a manic episode, especially regarding the choice of the proper mood stabilizer and antipsychotic medication. METHOD: A narrative review was undertaken addressing 'treatment of bipolar mania'. Findings have been synthesized and incorporated with clinical experience into a model to support different treatment choices. RESULTS: To date, there is solid evidence supporting the use of several medications, such as lithium, divalproex, and carbamazepine, and antipsychotics, such as chlorpromazine, haloperidol, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, ziprasidone, aripiprazole, inhaled loxapine, asenapine, and cariprazine in acute mania, and some evidence supporting the use of clozapine or electroconvulsive therapy in treatment-refractory cases. However, in clinical practice, when making decisions about treatment, personalized treatment is needed, according to the different clinical presentations and more complex clinical situations within the manic episode and considering a long-term view and with the objective of not only a symptomatic but also functional recovery. After remission from acute mania, psychoeducation strategies are useful to ensure adherence. DISCUSSION: Despite the evidence forefficacy of many currently available treatments for mania, the majority of RCTs provide little direction for the clinician as to what steps might be optimal in different presentations of mania as well as in the presence of specific patient characteristics. Manic episodes should be managed on a personalized basis considering the clinical course and patient criteria and with the expectation of maintaining that treatment in the long-term.

The implications of hypersomnia in the context of major depression: Results from a large, international, observational study.

According to the DSM-5, "reduction in the need for sleep" is the only sleep-related criteria for mixed features in depressive episodes. We aimed at studying the prevalence, clinical correlates and the role of hypersomnia in a sample of acutely depressed patients. Secondarily, we factors significantly increasing the odds of hypersomnia were studied. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the BRIDGE-II-Mix study. Variables were compared between patients with hypersomnia (SLEEP+) and with insomnia (SLEEP-) with standard bivariate tests. A stepwise backward logistic regression model was performed with SLEEP+ as dependent variable. A total of 2514 subjects were dichotomized into SLEEP+ (n = 423, 16.8%) and SLEEP- (n = 2091, 83.2%). SLEEP+ had significant higher rates of obese BMI (p < 0.001), BD diagnosis (p = 0.027), severe BD (p < 0.001), lifetime suicide attempts (p < 0.001), lower age at first depression (p = 0.004) than SLEEP-. Also, SLEEP+ had significantly poorer response to antidepressants (AD) such as (hypo)manic switches, AD resistance, affective lability, or irritability (all 0<0.005). Moreover, SLEEP+ had significantly higher rates of mixed-state specifiers than SLEEP- (all 0 < 0.006). A significant contribution to hypersomnia in our regression model was driven by metabolic-related features, such as "current bulimia" (OR = 4.21) and "overweight/obese BMI (OR = 1.42)". Globally, hypersomnia is associated with poor outcome in acute depression. Hypersomnia is strongly associated with mixed features and bipolarity. Metabolic aspects could influence the expression of hypersomnia, worsening the overall clinical outcome. Along with commonly used screening tools, detection of hypersomnia has potential, costless discriminative validity in the differential diagnosis unipolar and bipolar depression.