RESUMO
OBJECTIVE(S): Implementation of the 80-hour mandate was expected to reduce attrition from general surgery (GS) residency. This is the first quantitative report from a national prospective study of resident/program characteristics associated with attrition. METHODS: Analysis included all categorical GS residents entered on American Board of Surgery residency rosters in 2007 to 2008. Cases of attrition were identified by program report, individually confirmed, and linked to demographic data from the National Study of Expectations and Attitudes of Residents in Surgery administered January 2008. RESULTS: All surgical categorical GS residents active on the 2007-2008 resident rosters (N = 6,303) were analyzed for attrition. Complete National Study of Expectations and Attitudes of Residents in Surgery demographic information was available for 3959; the total and survey groups were similar with regard to important characteristics. About 3% of US categorical residents resigned in 2007 to 2008, and 0.4% had contracts terminated. Across all years (including research), there was a 19.5% cumulative risk of resignation. Attrition was highest in PGY-1 (5.9%), PGY-2 (4.3%), and research year(s) (3.9%). Women were no more likely to leave programs than men (2.1% vs. 1.9%). Of several program/resident variables examined, postgraduate year-level was the only independent predictor of attrition in multivariate analysis. Residents who left GS whose plans were known most often pursued nonsurgical residencies (62%), particularly anesthesiology (21%) and radiology (11%). Only 13% left for surgical specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Attrition rates are high despite mandated work hour reductions; 1 in 5 GS categorical residents resigns, and most pursue nonsurgical careers. Demographic factors, aside from postgraduate year do not appear predictive. Residents are at risk for attrition early in training and during research, and this could afford educators a target for intervention.
Assuntos
Escolha da Profissão , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Internato e Residência , Evasão Escolar/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos , Carga de TrabalhoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: High surgeon volume is associated with improved outcomes in adult endocrine surgery. This is the first population-based outcomes study for thyroidectomy/parathyroidectomy in children. METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses were performed using 1999 to 2005 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample data. Outcomes included complications, length of stay (LOS), and costs. High-volume surgeons performed >30 cervical endocrine procedures per year in adults and children; pediatric surgeons restricted >90% of their practices to patients =17 years old. Other surgeons fell into neither category. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: We included 607 patients, representing 20% of the pediatric endocrine operations done between 1999 and 2005 in the United States. Seventy-six percent of patients were female. Among the procedures performed, 92% were thyroidectomies and 8% were parathyroidectomies. Surgeons were classified as follows: 18% High-volume, 21% Pediatric, and 61% Other. High-volume surgeons had the lowest LOS (1.5 days vs 2.3 Pediatric, 2.0 Other; P = .01), costs ($12,474 vs $19,594 Pediatric, $13,614 Other; P < .01), and complications (6% vs 11% Pediatric, 10% Other; P = NS). In multivariate analyses, case volume of the endocrine surgeons was an independent predictor of LOS and costs. CONCLUSION: High-volume surgeons have better outcomes after thyroidectomy/parathyroidectomy in children compared with Pediatric and Other surgeons. Surgeon experience was an independent predictor of LOS and costs. High-volume endocrine and pediatric surgeons could combine expertise to improve outcomes in children.