Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BJU Int ; 132(3): 314-320, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37129977

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether low-dose tadalafil (5 mg) is more efficient than tamsulosin (0.4 mg) in facilitating calculus expulsion in those receiving extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for solitary upper urinary tract calculi. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a triple-blinded, prospective, superiority, randomized controlled, single-centre trial. A total of 250 patients with solitary renal or ureteric calculus measuring 6-24 mm were randomized (1:1) to receive either 0.4 mg tamsulosin or 5 mg tadalafil daily for 30 days or until calculus clearance, whichever was earlier. RESULTS: There was no difference in the primary outcome, namely, calculus expulsion rate at 30 days (tamsulosin vs tadalafil, n (%) 99 [81.1%] vs 98 [80.3%] respectively, 95% confidence interval = 0.8% [-9.0, 10.7], P = 0.874). Similarly, a lack of difference was also noted in the secondary outcome, number of days to expulsion (tamsulosin vs tadalafil, geometric mean [SD] 13.59 [2.39] vs 13.74 [2.39] respectively, P = 0.928). Four patients discontinued the drug due to adverse drug reactions in the tadalafil group. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose tadalafil is not superior to tamsulosin in improving calculus expulsion when used as an adjunct to shockwave lithotripsy. In this study, we also noted that tadalafil was less tolerated.


Assuntos
Litotripsia , Cálculos Ureterais , Humanos , Tansulosina/uso terapêutico , Tadalafila/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Cálculos Ureterais/terapia , Cálculos Ureterais/complicações , Litotripsia/efeitos adversos
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 30(3): 242-9, 2007 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17644318

RESUMO

Diclofenac sodium (Dc), an anti-inflammatory agent, has remarkable inhibitory action both against drug-sensitive and drug-resistant clinical isolates of various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The aim of this study was to determine the ability of Dc to protect mice from a virulent Salmonella infection. Dc injected at 1.5 microg/g and 3.0 microg/g mouse body weight significantly protected animals from the lethality of Salmonella infection. As was the case for the in vitro interaction, Dc in combination with streptomycin was even more effective. The non-antibiotic drug Dc has potential for the management of problematic antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Diclofenaco/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Animais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/toxicidade , Antipsicóticos/farmacologia , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Meios de Cultura , DNA Bacteriano/genética , DNA Bacteriano/isolamento & purificação , Diclofenaco/toxicidade , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Escherichia coli/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/microbiologia , Masculino , Camundongos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Plasmídeos/genética , Salmonella enterica/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Estreptomicina/farmacologia , Trifluoperazina/farmacologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...