A fast strong coupling algorithm for the partitioned fluid-structure interaction simulation of BMHVs.

The numerical simulation of Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valves (BMHVs) has gained strong interest in the last years, as a design and optimisation tool. In this paper, a strong coupling algorithm for the partitioned fluid-structure interaction simulation of a BMHV is presented. The convergence of the coupling iterations between the flow solver and the leaflet motion solver is accelerated by using the Jacobian with the derivatives of the pressure and viscous moments acting on the leaflets with respect to the leaflet accelerations. This Jacobian is numerically calculated from the coupling iterations. An error analysis is done to derive a criterion for the selection of useable coupling iterations. The algorithm is successfully tested for two 3D cases of a BMHV and a comparison is made with existing coupling schemes. It is observed that the developed coupling scheme outperforms these existing schemes in needed coupling iterations per time step and CPU time.

The upstream boundary condition influences the leaflet opening dynamics in the numerical FSI simulation of an aortic BMHV.

In this paper, the influence of the upstream boundary condition in the numerical simulation of an aortic bileaflet mechanical heart valve (BMHV) is studied. Three three-dimensional cases with different upstream boundary conditions are compared. The first case consists of a rigid straight tube with a velocity profile at its inlet. In the second case, the upstream geometry is a contracting left ventricle (LV), positioned symmetrically with respect to the valve. In the last case, the LV is positioned asymmetrical with respect to the valve. The cases are used to simulate the same three-dimensional BMHV. The change in time of the LV volume is calculated such that the flow rate through the valve is identical in each case. The opening dynamics of the BMHV are modelled using fluid-structure interaction. The simulations show that differences occur in the leaflet movement of the three cases. In particular, with the asymmetric LV, one of the leaflets impacts the blocking mechanism at its open position with a 34% higher velocity than when using the velocity profile, and with an 88% higher velocity than in the symmetric LV case. Therefore, when simulating such an impact, the upstream boundary condition needs to be chosen carefully.