Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 52(10): 842-9, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25074865

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Finasteride, a selective inhibitor of type 2 5-α reductase isoenzyme, inhibits the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and is indicated in the treatment of male androgenetic alopecia. The study objective was to evaluate a newly developed finasteride 0.25% topical solution in comparison to the marketed finasteride 1 mg tablet, with respect to finasteride pharmacokinetics and suppressive effects on plasma DHT. METHODS: 24 healthy men with androgenetic alopecia were randomized in a single center, open-label, parallel-group, exploratory study, and received either multiple scalp applications of the topical solution b.i.d. or oral doses of the reference tablet o.d. for 7 days. Plasma finasteride, testosterone and DHT concentrations were determined. RESULTS: After multiple doses, mean (± SD) finasteride C(max) and AUC(0-t) corresponded to 0.46 ± 0.28 ng/mL and 6.64 ± 7.50 ng/mL x h for the topical solution and to 6.86 ± 1.78 ng/mL and 57.93 ± 29.38 ng/mL x h for the tablet. Plasma DHT was reduced by ~ 68 - 75% with the topical solution and by ~ 62 - 72% with the tablet. No relevant changes occurred for plasma testosterone with either treatment. No clinically significant adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: A strong and similar inhibition of plasma DHT was found after 1 week of treatment with the topical and tablet finasteride ormulations, albeit finasteride plasma exposure was significantly lower with the topical than with the oral product (p < 0.0001).


Assuntos
Alopecia/tratamento farmacológico , Di-Hidrotestosterona/sangue , Finasterida/administração & dosagem , Administração Tópica , Adulto , Finasterida/farmacocinética , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Pulm Pharmacol Ther ; 26(2): 249-55, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23232039

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Tobramycin nebuliser solution (TNS) is indicated for maintenance therapy in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients with chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) infections. Adherence to recommended therapy in CF has always been a challenge and new generation nebulisers are increasingly used "off label" to reduce the time required for inhalation, potentially improving patient compliance. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, multi-centre, two-period crossover study, 27 CF patients with PA infection received TNS 300 mg/4 mL (TNS4) via the PARI eFlow(®) rapid or PARI LC Plus(®) nebuliser twice daily for 28 days in two study periods separated by a 4-week washout. The pharmacokinetic profile in plasma and sputum were determined after single and multiple dose administration on Day 1 and Day 28, respectively. Nebulisation times and general safety and tolerability profiles were evaluated throughout the study. RESULTS: Plasma tobramycin pharmacokinetic profiles were similar for the eFlow and LC Plus nebulisers both on Day 1 and Day 28. After multiple dose administration for 28 days, the eFlow/LC Plus ratio of geometric means for plasma C(max) and AUC(0-t), were 85.32 (90% CI, 61.24-118.86) and 87.44 (90% CI, 64.87-117.87), respectively. Despite the high variability, sputum tobramycin C(max) and AUC(0-t) for the eFlow on Day 28 tended to be higher than for the LC Plus (90% CI for the ratio, 86.11-226.45 and 81.81-236.71), respectively. Nebulisation times were significantly shorter for the eFlow with a median time for nebulisation of 5 min in comparison to 13 min for the LC Plus. Safety data confirmed a favourable safety profile for TNS4, with the majority of the findings being related to the underlying CF disease. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma and sputum pharmacokinetic data in CF patients with chronic PA infection support comparable pulmonary delivery and safety of TNS4 administered using different nebulisers, with a significantly shorter nebulisation time for the eFlow.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Fibrose Cística/complicações , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Tobramicina/farmacocinética , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nebulizadores e Vaporizadores , Escarro/metabolismo , Tobramicina/administração & dosagem , Tobramicina/efeitos adversos
3.
Pharmacology ; 89(3-4): 188-91, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22433300

RESUMO

AIMS: To compare the bioavailability of a new oromucosal formulation of flurbiprofen 8.75-mg lozenges, developed by Alfa Wassermann S.p.A. (test drug) to that of marketed flurbiprofen 8.75-mg lozenges (Benactiv Gola®, reference drug). METHODS: This was an open, randomised, two-period, crossover, pharmacokinetic (PK) study in which flurbiprofen plasma levels were compared in 12 healthy volunteers after the administration of single doses (8.75 mg × 2) of two different oromucosal lozenges to be sucked and slowly dissolved in the mouth. A wash-out period of at least 7 days separated the two study periods. Blood samples were collected prior to dosing and at predefined intervals for 24 h after dose. Flurbiprofen plasma concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. PK parameters maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time to maximum plasma concentration (T(max)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours (AUC(0-t)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-)∞) and half-life were calculated and compared by analysis of variance using treatment, period and sequence as sources of variation. Bioequivalence between the two formulations was based on 90% confidence intervals of the ratio of the geometric means of C(max) and AUC falling within the 0.80-1.25 range as defined in bioequivalence guidelines by regulators. Tolerability of the two formulations was assessed by adverse event monitoring, routine laboratory tests, physical examination, electrocardiographic tracing and vital sign measurements. RESULTS: All enrolled subjects completed the study. Bioequivalence without significant treatment effect was demonstrated between the test drug/reference drug ratios of mean C(max) and AUCs. Moreover, mean T(max) was superimposable. No safety parameter presented a clinically relevant variation after administration of either formulation that were therefore well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The new formulation of flurbiprofen 8.75-mg compressed lozenges developed by Alfa Wassermann S.p.A. is bioequivalent to the reference product flurbiprofen 8.75-mg lozenges (Benactiv Gola) in healthy volunteers.


Assuntos
Analgésicos/farmacocinética , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/farmacocinética , Flurbiprofeno/farmacocinética , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos/sangue , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/sangue , Área Sob a Curva , Estudos Cross-Over , Formas de Dosagem , Feminino , Flurbiprofeno/administração & dosagem , Flurbiprofeno/sangue , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...