RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to determine the frequency of successful limb salvage in patients presenting with critical limb ischemia utilizing the available revascularization modalities. This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from April 2017 to August 2017. METHODOLOGY: A total of 96 patients with critical limb ischemia requiring urgent surgery for limb salvage were included in our study. Patients who had undergone previous surgeries for limb ischemia involving the same limb, had concurrent venous disease, or suffered from acute limb ischemia were excluded. All patients underwent either endoscopic angioplasty or bypass surgery. All patients were followed up for six months for the success of limb salvage and the requirement for amputation. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 26.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). RESULTS: Our patients had a mean age of 62.03±8.46 years, of whom 63 (65.6%) were men. A total of 47 (49.0%) patients required surgery for a non-healing ulcer, while 49 (51.0%) had resting leg pain. In 55 (57.3%) patients, bypass surgery was performed, while 35 (36.5%) underwent endoscopic angioplasty. The remaining six (6.2%) patients received a combination of both procedures. Limb salvage was successful in 78 (81.3%) patients. There was no difference between outcomes across gender (p=0.122), nor was there any difference in outcome between bypass surgery and endoscopic angioplasty (p=0.665). CONCLUSION: Encouraging results can be obtained in treatment of critical limb ischemia if revascularization techniques are utilized prudently in a time-effective manner and individualized to each patient's requirements.
RESUMO
Objectives To determine the efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in terms of frequency of surgical site infection (SSI) and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing colorectal surgeries for colorectal carcinoma. Study design Quasi-experimental study. Setting/Duration of study Department of Surgery, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from May 7, 2019 to November 6, 2019. Methodology A total of 120 patients with colorectal carcinomas who fulfilled that sample selection criteria were studied. After randomization, patients were divided into two equal groups; one group received management under ERAS while the second group received conventional management. All patients were recorded for length of hospital stay and the development of SSIs. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0. Results The mean age was 42.34 ± 14.45 years, with a male majority, i.e., 72 (60%). The mean duration of in-patient stay was 3.45 ± 1.73 days with ERAS and 8.25 ± 1.58 days with conventional management (p < 0.001). A total of 28 (23.3%) SSIs developed, of which nine (7.5%) SSIs occurred with ERAS, while 19 (15.8%) occurred with traditional management (p = 0.031). Conclusion ERAS protocols have been demonstrated to be effective, cheap, and safe. There is a tangible reduction in length of hospital stay and incidence of SSIs which translates into reduced utilization of resources and financial costs. However, strict adherence to the protocol may be necessary to obtain the aforementioned benefits, which may be difficult to do in the face of professional, institutional, and personal inertia. Intensive efforts are required to make these protocols more convenient and attractive to implement, so as to facilitate conversion to this management approach.
