Interferon alpha plus intermittent oral Ara-C ocfosfate (YNK-01) in chronic myeloid leukemia primarily resistant or with minimal cytogenetic response to interferon.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Subcutaneous Ara-C plus interferon (IFN) produces more cytogenetic responses than IFN in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) but a greater toxicity. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and tolerance of IFN plus oral Ara-C ocfosfate (YNK-01) in IFN-resistant CML patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: A phase II pilot study was conducted in 19 CML patients primarily resistant or with minimal cytogenetic response to IFN. Patients were scheduled to receive 6 monthly 14-day cycles of YNK-01 (500 mg/day), with progressive escalation if tolerated, in addition to IFN. Cytogenetic assessment was performed thereafter. RESULTS: Of the first 7 patients, 5 had severe hematologic and 5 moderate gastrointestinal toxicity; IFN was reduced in 6, YNK-01 in 5, and treatment discontinued in 2; hematologic response was achieved in 2 of the 5 evaluable patients. In the following 4 patients the Ara-C was reduced to 300 mg: 2 had severe hematologic and 2 moderate gastrointestinal toxicity; IFN and Ara-C were reduced in 2 patients and treatment discontinued in 2 due to progression or toxicity; the other 2 achieved a minor cytogenetic response, progressing in one to a major response after 6 more cycles. In 8 patients the starting Ara-C dose was 200 mg: 5 had moderate-severe hematologic and 5 mild gastrointestinal toxicity; IFN was reduced in 5, Ara-C in 1, and treatment discontinued in 1; Ara-C was increased in 7 cases; hematologic response was obtained in 4 patients, 2 of whom attained a minor and 1 a major cytogenetic response. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: These results provide background for future studies aimed at ascertaining the role of oral Ara-C combined with IFN or STI571 in newly diagnosed CML.

Blood transfusion has no effect on colorectal cancer survival. A population-based study.

This study was conducted to evaluate the impact on survival of perioperative blood transfusion in a series of 698 colorectal cancer patients undergoing radical surgery. Patients were identified, and follow-up was carried out by the local population-based cancer registry. Data on blood transfusion was obtained by record linkage with the files of the blood banks operating in the area covered by the registry. Prognostic factors were age, Dukes stage and topography of the primary tumour. Relative risk (RR) for Dukes B patients was 1.53 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94-2.50] and for Dukes C, 3.57 (95% CI 2.22-5.75) when compared with Dukes A patients. For the left colon, RR was 0.96 (0.61-1.52) and for the rectum 1.87 (1.22-2.86) when compared with the right colon. When adjusting for these factors and excluding operative mortality, RR for transfused patients was 1.16 (95% CI 0.87-1.55). It is concluded that blood transfusion does not adversely affect survival in colorectal cancer patients.