Endoscopic and endosonography guided fine-needle aspiration.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration is emerging as the preferred technique for the cytologic diagnosis of various gastrointestinal lesions. This technique may not be routinely available, but there is still a role for endoscopic or endoscopic ultrasound-assisted fine-needle aspiration. This article provides an overview of the evolution of these various techniques and discusses the advantages, disadvantages, indications, and contraindications of each.

The serum-ascites albumin gradient is superior to the exudate-transudate concept in the differential diagnosis of ascites.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the serum-ascites albumin gradient to the exudate-transudate concept in the classification of ascites. DESIGN: Prospective collection of ascitic fluid data from patients with well-characterized causes of ascites. SETTING: Hepatology inpatient and outpatient ward and consult service of a large, urban hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 901 paired serum and ascitic fluid samples were collected from consecutive patients with all forms of ascites. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The utility of the serum-ascites albumin gradient and the old exudate-transudate concept (as defined by ascitic fluid total protein concentration [AFTP]) were compared for their ability in discriminating the cause for ascites formation. RESULTS: The albumin gradient correctly differentiated causes of ascites due to portal hypertension from those that were not due to portal hypertension 96.7% of the time. The AFTP, when used as defined in the old exudate-transudate concept, classified the causes of ascites correctly only 55.6% of the time. This resulted in part because the AFTP of most spontaneously infected samples (traditionally expected to be exudates) was low, and the AFTP of most cardiac ascites samples (traditionally expected to be transudates) was high. CONCLUSIONS: The exudate-transudate concept should be discarded in the classification of ascites. The serum-ascites albumin gradient is far more useful than the AFTP as a marker for portal hypertension, but the latter remains a useful adjunct in the differential diagnosis of ascites.

Diuresis increases ascitic fluid opsonic activity in patients who survive spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Patients with low protein ascites and deficient ascitic fluid opsonic activity have been shown to be unusually predisposed to development of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Survivors of spontaneous peritonitis frequently develop recurrent infection. Diuresis has been shown to increase the ascitic fluid opsonic activity of patients who have never had spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Patients with adequate opsonic activity are protected from ascitic fluid infection. Theoretically, the subset of patients who develop spontaneous peritonitis may have such severe liver disease that (i) their ascites is refractory to diuretic therapy or (ii) their ascitic fluid opsonic activity does not increase in response to diuresis. In this study, opsonic activity and concentrations of total protein and complement components were measured in the ascitic fluid of 11 patients who were hospitalized with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and who responded to oral diuretics. The mean values of all of these parameters were found to increase significantly comparing the end-of-diuresis samples to the specimens that were diagnostic of ascitic fluid infection. Patients who survive spontaneous bacterial peritonitis are able to increase their ascitic fluid total protein and opsonic activity in response to diuresis. This increase in endogenous antimicrobial activity may help prevent recurrence of ascitic fluid infection.

Short-course versus long-course antibiotic treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. A randomized controlled study of 100 patients.

In an attempt to determine the optimal duration of therapy of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, 100 patients with neutrocytic ascites and suspected spontaneous bacterial peritonitis were randomized to short-course vs. long-course treatment groups. Empiric therapy was initiated before the results of ascitic fluid culture were available. Of the 90 patients who met strict criteria for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or culture-negative neutrocytic ascites, 43 were randomized to a group receiving 5 days and 47 to a group receiving 10 days of single-agent cefotaxime, 2 g IV every 8 hours. Infection-related mortality (0% vs. 4.3%), hospitalization mortality (32.6% vs. 42.5%), bacteriologic cure (93.1% vs. 91.2%), and recurrence of ascitic fluid infection (11.6% vs. 12.8%) were not significantly different between the 5- and 10-day treatment groups, respectively. Recurrence rates were comparable to the values reported in the literature. The cost of antibiotic and antibiotic administration were significantly lower in the short-course group. Short-course treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is as efficacious as long-course therapy and significantly less expensive.

Ascitic fluid pH and lactate: insensitive and nonspecific tests in detecting ascitic fluid infection.

Ascitic fluid pH and lactate concentration have been proposed as useful tests for the detection of ascitic fluid infection. However, past studies involved small numbers of infected patients, and all did not use optimal culture techniques. This large study was performed using highly sensitive culture methods and sought (a) to compare the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of pH and lactate to that of the ascitic fluid neutrophil count and (b) to determine whether evaluation of ascitic fluid pH or lactate (or arterial-ascitic fluid pH or lactate gradient) would result in improved decision-making regarding empirical treatment of suspected ascitic fluid infection. Analysis of 206 ascitic fluid specimens obtained in 175 patients, including 101 infected specimens, revealed that ascitic fluid (or arterial-ascitic fluid) pH and lactate were less than 50% sensitive in detecting bacterial peritonitis and that these tests did not improve clinical decision-making about empirical treatment of suspected ascitic fluid infection. Although statistically significant differences in ascitic fluid pH were detected between infected samples and control samples, these differences did not appear to be clinically helpful. The ascitic fluid pH was 0% sensitive in detecting the presence of bacteria in the absence of neutrophils (i.e., no such specimens had a pH lower than 7.35). Ascitic fluid pH correlated well with neutrophil count and appears to be, at least in part, an indirect measure of the presence of neutrophils in ascitic fluid. Measurement of pH or lactate (or arterial-ascitic fluid gradients) is not helpful in the clinical management of infected ascitic fluid.

Effect of marked peripheral leukocytosis on the leukocyte count in ascites.

Patients with high peripheral leukocyte counts are sometimes found to have high leukocyte counts in ascitic fluid in the presence of negative cultures. To determine if peripheral leukocytosis (greater than or equal to 20 x 10(9)/L) by itself can result in high leukocyte or neutrophil counts in ascites, 29 patients were studied. A total of 31 paracenteses were performed in these patients as soon as the high peripheral leukocyte count was determined. Culture of ascitic fluid was performed using blood-culture bottles. The mean peripheral leukocyte count was 29.3 +/- 9.3 x 10(9)/L, with a mean neutrophil count of 19.9 +/- 6.5 x 10(9)/L. The mean ascitic fluid neutrophil count was 0.064 +/- 0.054 x 10(9)/L (range, 0.007 to 0.197 x 10(9)/L). No significant correlation was found between peripheral neutrophil (or leukocyte) count and neutrophil (or leukocyte) count in ascitic fluid. Marked peripheral leukocytosis (or neutrophilia) does not seem to have an effect on the leukocyte or neutrophil count in ascitic fluid.

Bedside inoculation of blood culture bottles with ascitic fluid is superior to delayed inoculation in the detection of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Ascitic fluids from patients suspected of having spontaneous bacterial peritonitis were inoculated into blood culture bottles (i) at the bedside and (ii) in the laboratory after a delay. In 29 episodes in which the bedside bottles were culture positive, only 22 (75.9%) of the laboratory-inoculated sets demonstrated growth; this difference was statistically significant (P less than 0.02).

Effect of diuresis versus therapeutic paracentesis on ascitic fluid opsonic activity and serum complement.

Therapeutic paracentesis has recently been reported to eliminate ascites in patients with cirrhosis more rapidly than diuresis. However, diuresis has been shown to increase ascitic fluid opsonic activity. Patients with adequate ascitic fluid opsonic activity have been reported to be protected from spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. In this randomized controlled trial, 19 patients with cirrhotic ascites were treated with diuresis versus daily therapeutic paracenteses during 20 hospitalizations. Serum and ascitic fluid complement concentrations and ascitic fluid opsonic activity were measured at the beginning and end of treatment. Although opsonic activity increased significantly (p less than 0.01) in patients treated with diuresis, this parameter was stable in the paracentesis group. The stability of the ascitic fluid opsonic activity and complement concentration in the paracentesis group were maintained at the expense of a decrease in serum complement, whereas serum and ascitic fluid complement increased in the diuresis group. Diuresis may have the advantage over therapeutic paracentesis of providing better protection from spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Study of larger numbers of patients will determine if these changes in complement concentrations and opsonic activity translate into an increased risk of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in vivo.