Kinetics and potency of halothane, isoflurane, and desflurane in the Northern Leopard frog Rana pipiens.

Equilibration between delivered and effect site anesthetic partial pressure is slow in frogs. The use of less soluble agents or overpressure delivery may speed equilibration. Ten Northern leopard frogs were exposed to 3-4 constant concentrations of halothane, isoflurane or desflurane and their motor response to noxious electrical stimulation of the forelimb evaluated every 30 minutes until a stable proportion of frogs were immobile. Each frog received each anesthetic and concentration in random order and allowed at least 14 hours to recover between anesthetic exposures. An overpressure technique based upon the kinetics in the first study was then tested with 4 concentrations of desflurane. For halothane, isoflurane and desflurane respectively; the proportion of frogs immobile in response to stimulus became stable after 510, 480 and 180 minutes, and ED50 values were 1.36, 1.67 and 6.78 % atm. Desflurane ED50 delivered by overpressure was not significantly different at 6.85 % atm. Halothane, isoflurane and desflurane are effective general anesthetics in frogs with potencies similar to those reported in mammals. The time required for anesthetic equilibration is fastest with desflurane and can be hastened further by initial delivery of higher partial pressures.

Isoflurane potency in the northern leopard frog Rana pipiens is similar to that in mammalian species and is unaffected by decerebration.

Amphibians are commonly used in biomedical research, including studies of mechanisms of anaesthetic action. There is, however, little published work describing the kinetics of inhaled anaesthetic agents or the potency of isoflurane in amphibians. Ten Northern leopard frogs were exposed to a constant isoflurane concentration of 1.0%, 1.2% or 1.5% atm for 4 h, and their response to a noxious stimulus was tested every 20 min. Each frog was anaesthetized with each concentration in random order and allowed at least 16 h to recover between anaesthetic exposures. Frogs were then pithed and the protocol was repeated. Frogs first displayed immobility during stimulus application at 80 min, and the proportion of animals becoming immobile steadily increased to reach a stable level at 4 h. The 50% effective dose for isoflurane in intact and pithed frogs did not differ, and was 1.15 and 1.25% atm, respectively. The potency of isoflurane in leopard frogs was similar to that reported in mammalian species. Cutaneous uptake of anaesthetic is effective given sufficient time, approximately 4 h in this study. Forebrain structures appear to be unimportant for the immobilizing action of isoflurane in the frog.

Propofol, more than halothane, depresses electroencephalographic activation resulting from electrical stimulation in reticular formation.

BACKGROUND: Halothane and propofol depress the central nervous system, and this is partly manifested by a decrease in electroencephalographic (EEG) activity. Little work has been performed to determine the differences between these anesthetics with regard to their effects on evoked EEG activity. We examined the effects of halothane and propofol on EEG responses to electrical stimulation of the reticular formation. METHODS: Rats (n= 12) were anesthetized with either halothane or propofol, and EEG responses were recorded before and after electrical stimulation of the reticular formation. Two anesthetic concentrations were used (0.8 and 1.2 times the amount needed to prevent gross, purposeful movement in response to supramaximal noxious stimulation), and both anesthetics were studied in each rat using a cross-over design. RESULTS: Electrical stimulation in the reticular formation increased the spectral edge (SEF) and median edge (MEF) frequencies by approximately 1-2 Hz during halothane anesthesia at low and high concentrations. During propofol anesthesia, MEF increased at the low propofol infusion rate, but SEF was unaffected. At the high propofol infusion rate, SEF and MEF decreased following electrical stimulation in the reticular formation. CONCLUSIONS: At immobilizing concentrations, propofol produces a larger decrease than halothane in EEG responses to reticular formation stimulation, consistent with propofol having a more profound depressant effect on cortical and subcortical structures.

Nitrous oxide depresses electroencephalographic responses to repetitive noxious stimulation in the rat.

BACKGROUND: Although N(2)O has been widely used as an anaesthetic adjuvant its effect on electroencephalographic (EEG) activity is poorly understood because it is usually studied in the presence of additional anaesthetics, including inhaled anaesthetics. We examined the EEG effects of N(2)O in rats using a hyperbaric chamber that permitted N(2)O to be the sole anaesthetic. METHODS: Rats (n=10) were anaesthetized with isoflurane and EEG activity was recorded from skull screws. The rats were placed into a hyperbaric chamber and mechanically ventilated. Isoflurane was eliminated while the chamber was pressurized with N(2)O. The minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) was determined in five rats by adjusting the chamber pressure and N(2)O concentration, and applying a tetanic noxious stimulus to the tail via an electrical pass-through. EEG responses to noxious stimulation (20 electrical pulses at 40 V applied to the tail at 0.1, 1 and 3 Hz, and 50 Hz tetanic stimulation at 60 mA applied for 30 s) were determined at 1.5 and 2 atm N(2)O. RESULTS: The N(2)O MAC was 1.7+/-0.1 atm. No consistent EEG activation occurred during electrical stimulation at either partial pressure of N(2)O, although spontaneous EEG activation often occurred. Blood pressure increased after the 3 and 50 Hz stimuli. Four other rats anaesthetized with isoflurane had EEG activation with the 3 and 50 Hz stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that N(2)O at peri-MAC partial pressures prevents EEG activation resulting from noxious electrical stimulation. Unlike the situation with isoflurane, stimulus-evoked EEG activation did not occur at peri-MAC anaesthetic concentrations, suggesting that N(2)O potently blocked ascending nociceptive transmission.

Halothane and propofol differentially affect electroencephalographic responses to noxious stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Anaesthetics blunt neuronal responses to noxious stimulation, including effects on electroencephalographic (EEG) responses. It is unclear how anaesthetics differ in their ability to modulate noxious stimulation-evoked EEG activation. We investigated the actions of propofol and halothane on EEG responses to noxious stimuli, including repetitive electrical C-fibre stimulation, which normally evokes neuronal wind-up. METHODS: Rats were anaesthetized with halothane (n=8) or propofol (n=8), at 0.8x or 1.2x the amount required to produce immobility in response to tail clamping [minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) for halothane and median effective dose (ED(50)) for propofol]. We recorded EEG responses to repetitive electrical stimulus trains (delivered to the tail at 0.1, 1 and 3 Hz) as well as supramaximal noxious tail stimulation (clamp; 50 Hz electrical stimulus, each for 30 s). RESULTS: Under halothane anaesthesia, noxious stimuli evoked an EEG activation response manifested by increased spectral edge frequency (SEF) and median edge frequency (MEF). At 0.8 MAC halothane, the tail clamp increased the MEF from approximately 6 to approximately 8.5 Hz, and the SEF from approximately 25.5 to approximately 27 Hz. At both 0.8 and 1.2 MAC halothane, similar patterns of EEG activation were observed with the 1 Hz, 3 Hz and tetanic stimulus trains, but not with 0.1 Hz stimulation, which does not evoke wind-up. Under propofol anaesthesia, noxious stimuli were generally ineffective in causing EEG activation. At 0.8 ED(50) propofol, only the tail clamp and 1 Hz stimuli increased MEF ( approximately 8 to approximately 10-10.5 Hz). At the higher propofol infusion rate (1.2 ED(50)) the repetitive electrical stimuli did not evoke an EEG response, but the tetanic stimulus and the tail clamp paradoxically decreased SEF (from approximately 23 to approximately 21.5 Hz). CONCLUSIONS: Propofol has a more significant blunting effect on EEG responses to noxious stimulation compared with halothane.

Intrathecal picrotoxin minimally alters electro-encephalographic responses to noxious stimulation during halothane and isoflurane anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Isoflurane and halothane act in the spinal cord to blunt ascending transmission of impulses to the brain resulting from noxious stimulation. Because intrathecal picrotoxin (an antagonist at the gamma-aminobutyric acid-A receptor) partially reverses the immobilizing effect of isoflurane and halothane, we hypothesized that the electroencephalographic response to noxious stimulation would likewise be partially reversed by intrathecal picrotoxin. METHODS: Rats were anesthetized with isoflurane (n = 8) or halothane (n = 8) and a laminectomy performed. Following determination of minimum alveolar concentration (MAC), the electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded during separate applications of a hindpaw clamp, tail clamp and electrical current to the tail at 0.8 and 1.2 MAC. Picrotoxin was then applied to the exposed spinal cord and the EEG response to noxious stimulation again determined. RESULTS: The EEG was more active during halothane anesthesia than isoflurane (spectral edge frequency for 95% power: 25.6 +/- 2.1 Hz vs. 23.1 +/- 1.6 Hz, P < 0.05). Noxious stimulation usually caused the EEG to shift to higher frequencies (e.g. for 0.8 MAC halothane, median edge frequency for 50% power: from 7.6 +/- 3.1 Hz to 10.7 +/- 2.6 Hz, P < 0.05). Picrotoxin minimally affected this response. CONCLUSIONS: Noxious stimulation evokes an EEG response that is minimally altered by intrathecal picrotoxin. This suggests that isoflurane and halothane do not have GABAergic actions in the spinal cord that indirectly suppress the EEG response.

Application of nucleus pulposus to L5 dorsal root ganglion in rats enhances nociceptive dorsal horn neuronal windup.

Herniation of the nucleus pulposus (NP) from lumbar intervertebral discs commonly results in radiculopathic pain possibly through a neuroinflammatory response. NP sensitizes dorsal horn neuronal responses, but it is unknown whether this reflects a central or peripheral sensitization. To study central sensitization, we tested if NP enhances windup--the progressive increase in the response of a nociceptive spinal neuron to repeated electrical C-fiber stimulation--a phenomenon that may partly account for temporal summation of pain. Single-unit recordings were made from wide dynamic range (WDR; n = 36) or nociceptive-specific (NS; n = 8) L5 dorsal horn neurons in 44 isoflurane-anesthetized rats. Subcutaneous electrodes delivered electrical stimuli (20 pulses, 3 times the C-fiber threshold, 0.5 ms) to the receptive field on the hindpaw. Autologous NP was harvested from a tail disc and placed onto the L5 dorsal root ganglion after recording of baseline responses (n = 22). Controls had saline applied similarly (n = 22). Electrical stimulus trains (0.1, 0.3, and 1 Hz; 5-min interstimulus interval) were repeated every 30 min for 3-6 h after each treatment. The total number of evoked spikes (summed across all 20 stimuli) to 0.1 Hz was enhanced 3 h after NP, mainly in the after-discharge (AD) period (latency > 400 ms). Total responses to 0.3 and 1.0 Hz were also enhanced at > or = 60 min after NP in both the C-fiber (100- to 400-ms latency) and AD periods, whereas the absolute windup (C-fiber + AD - 20 times the initial response) increased at > or = 90 min after treatment. In saline controls, windup was not enhanced at any time after treatment for any stimulus frequency, although there was a trend toward enhancement at 0.3 Hz. These results are consistent with NP-induced central sensitization. Mechanical responses were not significantly enhanced after saline or NP treatment. We speculate that inflammatory agents released from (or recruited by) NP affect the dorsal root ganglion (and/or are transported to cord) to enhance primary afferent excitation of nociceptive dorsal horn neurons.

Differential effects of halothane and isoflurane on lumbar dorsal horn neuronal windup and excitability.

BACKGROUND: Windup of spinal nociceptive neurones may underlie temporal summation of pain, influencing the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of anaesthetics required to prevent movement to supramaximal stimuli. We hypothesized that halothane and isoflurane would differentially affect windup of dorsal horn neurones. METHODS: We recorded 18 nociceptive dorsal horn neurones exhibiting windup to 1 Hz electrical hindpaw stimuli in rats. Effects of 0.8 and 1.2 MAC isoflurane and halothane were recorded in the same neurones (counterbalanced, crossover design). Windup was calculated as the total number of C-fibre (100-400 ms latency) plus afterdischarge (400-1000 ms latency) spikes/20 stimuli (area under curve, AUC) or absolute windup (C-fibre plus afterdischarge-20 x initial response). RESULTS: Increasing isoflurane from 0.8 to 1.2 MAC did not affect AUC, but increased absolute windup from 429 (62) to 618 (84) impulses/20 stimuli (P<0.05) and depressed the initial C-fibre response from 14 (3) to 8 (2) impulses (P<0.05). Increasing halothane from 0.8 to 1.2 MAC depressed AUC from 690 (79) to 537 (65) impulses/20 stimuli (P<0.05) and the initial response from 18 (2) to 13 (2) impulses (P<0.05), but absolute windup was not affected. Absolute windup was 117% greater during 1.2 MAC isoflurane compared with 1.2 MAC halothane. CONCLUSIONS: Windup was significantly greater under isoflurane than halothane anaesthesia at 1.2 MAC, whereas the initial C-fibre response was suppressed more by isoflurane. These findings suggest that these two anaesthetics have mechanistically distinct effects on neuronal windup and excitability.

Spinal anaesthesia indirectly depresses cortical activity associated with electrical stimulation of the reticular formation.

BACKGROUND: Neuraxial blockade reduces the requirements for sedation and general anaesthesia. We investigated whether lidocaine spinal anaesthesia affected cortical activity as determined by EEG desynchronization that occurs following electrical stimulation of the midbrain reticular formation (MRF). METHODS: Six goats were anaesthetized with isoflurane, and cervical laminectomy performed to permit spinal application of lidocaine. The EEG was recorded before, during and after focal electrical stimulation (0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 mA) in the MRF while keeping the isoflurane concentration constant. RESULTS: During lidocaine spinal anaesthesia, the spectral edge frequency (SEF) after MRF electrical stimulation (13.6 (SD 1.0) Hz, averaged across all stimulus currents) was less than the SEF during control and recovery periods (18.6 (3.6) Hz and 17.2 (2.2) Hz, respectively; P<0.05). Bispectral index values were similarly affected: 69 (10) at control compared with 55 (6) during the spinal block (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that lidocaine spinal anaesthesia blocks ascending somatosensory transmission to mildly depress the excitability of reticulo-thalamo-cortical arousal mechanisms.

Variable effects of nitrous oxide at multiple levels of the central nervous system in goats.

The direct and indirect effects of nitrous oxide (N2O) on the nociceptive responses of lumbar dorsal horn neurons, and the indirect effects on midbrain reticular formation (MRF) neurons and thalamic neurons were determined in goats anaesthetized with isoflurane. The technique used enabled the differential delivery of N2O to either the torso or the cerebral circulation, thus allowing assessment of the direct spinal and indirect brain effects of N2O. Systemic delivery of N2O appeared to have divergent effects, facilitating (4/11) or depressing (7/11) the responses of dorsal horn neurons. Such divergent effects were also observed when N2O was differentially delivered to the circulation in the torso (i.e. the spinal cord). Likewise, MRF and thalamic responses to noxious stimulation were variably affected by administration of N2O to the torso, with some cells facilitated (7/13 MRF neurons, 3/8 thalamic neurons) and others depressed (6/13 MRF neurons, 5/8 thalamic neurons). It appears that N2O has variable effects on the caprine CNS. The facilitatory action of N2O might partially explain why it is a relatively weak anaesthetic.

Thiopental directly depresses lumbar dorsal horn neuronal responses to noxious mechanical stimulation in goats.

BACKGROUND: Thiopental has hypnotic actions in the brain, but it also depresses nociceptive transmission. In this study we examined whether thiopental had direct (spinal) and/or indirect (supraspinal) effects on the responses of single lumbar dorsal horn neurons to noxious mechanical stimulation, using a method to deliver thiopental differentially to either the torso or cranial circulation in goats. METHODS: Goats (n=10) were anesthetized with isoflurane and neck dissections performed to permit cranial bypass. A lumbar laminectomy was made to permit single-unit recording of lumbar dorsal horn neuronal activity (1-2 neurons/animal). Isoflurane was maintained at 0.8+/-0.1% to both head and torso throughout the study. During cranial bypass, thiopental was separately administered to the torso (low dose, 1.5+/-0.5 mg/kg; high dose, 3.7+/-0.5 mg/kg) or cranial (low dose, 0.12+/-0.03 mg/kg; high dose, 0.2 mg/kg) circulation. RESULTS: Thiopental administered to the torso significantly depressed dorsal horn neuronal responses to noxious stimulation at the high dose: 757+/-471 to 392+/-305 impulses/min at 1 min post-injection, P<0.006 (n=14); evoked responses recovered at 5 min post-injection. At the low dose, there was a similar numerical decrease, but this did not reach significance: 876+/-780 to 407+/-499 impulses/min at 1 min post-injection, P>0.05 (n=6). No significant change was observed when thiopental was administered to the cranial circulation: low dose, 1061+/-1167 to 965+/-874 impulses/min at 1 min post-injection, P>0.05 (n=10); high dose, 864+/-331 to 917+/-525 impulses/min at 1 min post-injection, P>0.05 (n=8). CONCLUSION: Thiopental has a direct (spinal) depressant effect on dorsal neuronal responses to noxious stimulus, but no significant supraspinal effect.

Propofol action in both spinal cord and brain blunts electroencephalographic responses to noxious stimulation in goats.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Anesthetics, including propofol, depress the electroencephalogram (EEG) and neuronal activity in the midbrain reticular formation (MRF). Because propofol has anesthetic effects in the spinal cord, we hypothesized that it would indirectly depress EEG and MRF neuronal responses to noxious stimulation in part by a spinal cord action. DESIGN: Six goats were anesthetized with isoflurane and the jugular veins and carotid arteries were isolated to permit cranial bypass and differential propofol delivery. A noxious mechanical stimulus was applied to the distal forelimb while recording bifrontal EEG and MRF single-unit activities. Propofol was separately administered to the cranial (0.08 +/- 0.06 mg/kg) and torso circulations (4 mg/kg) and the noxious stimulus applied at 1,5, 10, and 15 min after each injection. SETTING: N/A. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: N/A. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Noxious stimulation decreased total power (TP) from 96 +/- 33, microV2/Hz to 38 +/- 20microV2/Hz, (mean +/- SD) and increased spectral edge frequency (SEF) from 10 +/- 3 Hz to 19 +/- 5 Hz (p<0.01). Propofol administered to the torso prevented stimulus-evoked changes in TP (121+/- 80 microV2/Hz, 121 +/- 74 microV2/Hz, 114 +/- 74 microV2/Hz at 1,5, and 10 min respectively, p<0.01 compared to control evoked response) and SEF (11 +/- 6Hz, 9 +/- 2Hz, 10 +/- 6Hz, and 12 +/- 5Hz at 1, 5, 10 and 15 min, respectively, p<0.001 compared to control evoked response). Propofol administered to the cranial circulation significantly blunted the EEG and MRF response, while torso-administered propofol had slight effects on MRF responses. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol blunted the EEG response to noxious stimulation in part via a subcortical action.

Isoflurane depresses electroencephalographic and medial thalamic responses to noxious stimulation via an indirect spinal action.

UNLABELLED: Anesthetics such as isoflurane act in the spinal cord to suppress movement in response to noxious stimulation. Spinal anesthesia decreases hypnotic/sedative requirements, possibly by decreasing afferent transmission of stimuli. We hypothesized that isoflurane action in the spinal cord would similarly depress the ascending transmission of noxious input to the thalamus and cerebral cortex. In six isoflurane-anesthetized goats, we measured electroencephalographic (EEG) and thalamic single-unit responses to a clamp applied to the forelimb. Cranial bypass permitted differential isoflurane delivery to the torso and cranial circulations. When the cranial-torso isoflurane combination was 1.3% +/- 0.2%-1.0% +/- 0.4% the noxious stimulus did not evoke significant changes in the EEG or thalamic activity: 389 (153-544) to 581 (172-726) impulses/min, (median, 25th-75th percentile range, P: > 0.05). When the cranial-torso isoflurane combination was 1.3% +/- 0.2%-0.3% +/- 0.2%, noxious stimulation increased thalamic activity: 804 (366-1162) to 1124 (766-1865) impulses/min (P: < 0.05), and the EEG "desynchronized": total EEG power decreased from 25 +/- 20 microV(2) to 12 +/- 8 microV(2) (P: < 0.05). When the cranial-torso isoflurane was 1.7% +/- 0.1%-0.3% +/- 0.2%, the noxious stimulus did not significantly affect thalamic: 576 (187-738) to 1031 (340-1442) impulses/min (P: > 0.05), or EEG activity. The indirect torso effect of isoflurane on evoked EEG total power (12.6 +/- 2.7 microV(2)/vol%, mean +/- SE) was quantitatively similar to the direct cranial effect (17.7 +/- 3.0 microV(2)/vol%; P: > 0.05). These data suggest that isoflurane acts in the spinal cord to blunt the transmission of noxious inputs to the thalamus and cerebral cortex, and thus might indirectly contribute to anesthetic endpoints such as amnesia and unconsciousness. IMPLICATIONS: Isoflurane action in the spinal cord diminished the transmission of noxious input to the brain. Because memory and consciousness are likely dependent on the "arousal" state of the brain, this indirect action of isoflurane could contribute to anesthetic-induced amnesia and unconsciousness.

Isoflurane anaesthetic depth in goats monitored using the bispectral index of the electroencephalogram.

The bispectral index (BIS) of the electroencephalogram has recently been used to monitor the depth of anaesthesia in humans. The BIS is a dimensionless number that varies between 0 and 100. We hypothesized that the BIS could also be used to monitor depth of isoflurane anaesthesia in goats. Needle electrodes were placed over the frontal region of the scalp of goats and 5%, isoflurane was administered via a mask. The BIS number was determined at clinically relevant end-points. The BIS number did not change when the animals became recumbent (95 +/- 5 to 94 +/- 7, n = 15), but decreased to 65 +/- 13 and 64 +/- 15 when the corneal reflex and withdrawal response to a noxious stimulus, respectively, were lost (p < 0.001, n = 12). Direct laryngoscopy and intubation increased the BIS (56 +/- 7 to 83 +/- 11; p < 0.05, n = 10), as did a noxious pinch to the dew-claw (57 +/- 9; to 76 +/- 9; p < 0.05, n = 10). The spectral edge (frequency below which 95% of the total power resided) paralleled the change in BIS. We conclude that the depth of isoflurane anaesthesia in goats can be monitored using the BIS, although further work is needed to determine its sensitivity and specificity.

Propofol directly depresses lumbar dorsal horn neuronal responses to noxious stimulation in goats.

PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that propofol, acting in the brain, would either enhance, or have no effect, on lumbar dorsal horn neuronal responses to a noxious mechanical stimulus applied to the hindlimb. We recorded the response of lumbar dorsal horn neurons during differential delivery of propofol to the brain and torso of goats. METHODS: Goats were anesthetized with isoflurane and neck dissections performed which permitted cranial bypass. A laminectomy was made to allow microelectrode recording of lumbar dorsal horn neuronal activity. Isoflurane was maintained at 0.8+/-0.1% to both head and torso throughout the study. During cranial bypass propofol was separately administered to the torso (1 mg x kg(-1), n = 7; 3.75 mg x kg(-1), n = 8) or cranial (0.04 mg x kg(-1), n = 7; 0.14 mg kg(-1), n = 8) circulations. RESULTS: Propofol administered to the torso depressed dorsal horn neuronal responses to noxious stimulation: low dose: 500+/-243 to 174+/-240 impulses x min(-1) at one minute post-injection, P<0.001; high dose: 478+/-204 to 91+/-138 impulses x min(-1) at one minute post-injection, P<0.05). Propofol administered to the cranial circulation had no effect: low dose: 315+/-150 to 410+/-272 impulses x min(-1), P>0.05; high dose: 462+/-261 to 371+/-196 impulses x min(-1), P>0.05. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that propofol has a direct depressant effect on dorsal horn neuronal responses to noxious stimulation, with little or no indirect supraspinal effect.

Isoflurane action in the spinal cord blunts electroencephalographic and thalamic-reticular formation responses to noxious stimulation in goats.

BACKGROUND: Isoflurane depresses the electroencephalographic (EEG) activity and exerts part of its anesthetic effect in the spinal cord. The authors hypothesized that isoflurane would indirectly depress the EEG and subcortical response to noxious stimulation in part by a spinal cord action. METHODS: Depth electrodes were inserted into the midbrain reticular formation (MRF) and thalamus of six of seven isoflurane-anesthetized goats, and needle-electrodes were placed into the skull periosteum. In five of seven goats, an MRF microelectrode recorded single-unit activity. The jugular veins and carotid arteries were isolated to permit cranial bypass and differential isoflurane delivery. A noxious mechanical stimulus (1 min) was applied to a forelimb dewclaw at each of two cranial-torso isoflurane combinations: 1.1+/-0.3%-1.2+/-0.3% and 1.1+/-0.3-0.3+/-0.1% (mean +/- SD). RESULTS: When cranial-torso isoflurane was 1.1-1.2%, the noxious stimulus did not alter the EEG. When torso isoflurane was decreased to 0.3%, the noxious stimulus activated the MRF, thalamic, and bifrontal-hemispheric regions (decreased high-amplitude, low-frequency power). For all channels combined, total (-33+/-15%), delta(-51+/-22%), theta (-33+/-19%), and alpha (-26+/-16%) power decreased after the noxious stimulus (P<0.05); beta power was unchanged. The MRF unit responses to the noxious stimulus were significantly higher when the spinal cord isoflurane concentration was 0.3% (1,286+/-1,317 impulses/min) as compared with 1.2% (489+/-437 impulses/min, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Isoflurane blunted the EEG and MRF-thalamic response to noxious stimulation in part via an action in the spinal cord.

Isoflurane blunts electroencephalographic and thalamic-reticular formation responses to noxious stimulation in goats.

BACKGROUND: Anesthetics, including isoflurane, depress the electroencephalogram (EEG). Little is known about the quantitative effects of isoflurane on EEG and subcortical electrical activity responses to noxious stimulation. The authors hypothesized that isoflurane would depress the results of EEG and subcortical response to noxious stimulation at concentrations less than those needed to suppress movement. Furthermore, determination of regional differences might aid in elucidation of sites of anesthetic action. METHODS: Ten goats were anesthetized with isoflurane, and minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) was determined using a noxious mechanical stimulus. Depth electrodes were inserted into the midbrain reticular formation and thalamus. Needle electrodes placed in the skull periosteum measured bifrontal and bihemispheric EEG. The noxious stimulus was applied at each of four anesthetic concentrations: 0.6, 0.9, 1.1, and 1.4 MAC. RESULTS: At an isoflurane concentration of 0.6 MAC, the noxious stimulus activated the midbrain reticular formation, thalamic, and bifrontal-hemispheric regions, as shown by decreased high-amplitude, low-frequency power. For all channels combined (mean +/- SD), total (-33+/-7%), delta (-47+/-12%), theta (-23+/-12%), and alpha (-21+/-6%) power decreased after the noxious stimulus (P < 0.001); beta power was unchanged. At 0.9 MAC, total (-35+/-5%), delta (-42+/-7%), theta (-35+/-8%), and alpha (-23+/-11%) power decreased after the noxious stimulus (P < 0.001); beta power was unchanged. At 1.1 MAC only one site, and at 1.4 MAC, no site, had decreased power after the noxious stimulus. CONCLUSIONS: Isoflurane blunted EEG and midbrain reticular formation-thalamus activation response to noxious stimulation at concentrations (1.1 MAC or greater) necessary to prevent movement that occurred after noxious stimulation. It is unknown whether this is a direct effect or an indirect effect via action in the spinal cord.

Quantitative and qualitative effects of isoflurane on movement occurring after noxious stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Anesthetic potency is assessed by determination of the anesthetic concentration that prevents gross, purposeful movement in response to noxious stimulation. It is unclear whether anesthetics cause a progressive decrease in the number and force of limb movements evoked by noxious stimulation, or a step decrease (consistent with an all-or-none effect at the site of action). The authors hypothesized that isoflurane and halothane would progressively depress the movement response. METHODS: Isoflurane minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) was determined in rats (N = 14) using a clamp applied to a hind paw. Lateral head movements and flexions of the forelimbs and hindlimbs were measured with force transducers. Isoflurane was adjusted to 0.6, 0.9, 1.1, and 1.4 MAC, the noxious stimulus applied, and the force and number of limb and head movements determined. Force and movement determinations were made in seven additional halothane-anesthetized rats. RESULTS: Isoflurane MAC was 1.3 +/- 0.1%. In general, if movement occurred after application of the noxious clamp, the head and all limbs were involved. At 0.6 MAC, the median number of extremity and head movements was 3.5 (10th-90th percentile, 2.0-11.4) with force generated per movement (force/movement) = 6.4 (2.0-13.2) N-s. Movement number decreased to 2.1 (0.25-4.2) at 0.9 MAC (P < 0.05), but force/movement was unchanged at 4.5 (0.4-15.1) N-s (Newton-second). At 1.1 MAC, movement number and force/movement decreased to 0.2 (0.0-1.5) and 0.1 (0.0-3.2) N-s, respectively (P < 0.005). No significant movement occurred at 1.4 MAC. The halothane-anesthetized rats had similar findings, although at 0.6 MAC they generated more movements (10.5 [5.2-19.8]) than the rats receiving isoflurane (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that increasing anesthetic concentration from 0.6 to 0.9 MAC had little effect on the motor system controlling the force of limb movements, and the neural system generating repeated limb movements was depressed, consistent with a differential anesthetic effect at separate sites.