Laparoscopic appendectomy: Which factors are predictors of conversion? A high-volume prospective cohort study.

Appendicitis represents one of the most frequent condition requiring surgery. In Italy almost 0.2% of the population will be affected by acute appendicitis every year. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has gained acceptance over the past years and despite several meta-analyses, randomized studies and retrospective studies have been conducted, the indications and results are still conflicting especially in cases of complicated appendicitis. The aim of our study is to evaluate which factors are related to conversion to open appendectomy (OA) during laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). MATHERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2011 to May 2013, appendectomy for acute appendicitis was performed on 434 patients in our Surgical Unit at S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy. Of these, 369 patients (85%) underwent LA. The clinical, demographic, surgical and pathological data of these patients were included in a prospective database. To note, only laparoscopic appendectomies were considered to be included in the analysis. The following factors were analyzed in order to identify which were associated with the conversion: age, sex, body mass index (BMI), previous abdominal surgery, comorbidities, clinical and laboratory parameters including Alvarado score, PCR, intraoperative findings such as anatomy and degree of inflammation. During our study period, laparoscopic appendectomies were performed by different surgeons both residents and attending surgeons. The decision to convert the intervention in an open procedure was taken by the individual surgeon. Regarding the postoperative period, were considered the time of hospitalization and related costs, time of oral intake of liquid and solid, time of passage of stool, readmissions and reoperations. RESULTS: At univariate analysis, the factors significantly related to the conversion were the presence of comorbidities (p < 0.001) and, among these, the presence of arterial hypertension (p = 0.006) or other cardiovascular diseases (p = 0.031) and the history of previous abdominal surgery (p = 0.023). Patients with higher mean age (33.9 ± 15.4 vs. 46.0 ± 19.3, p = 0.001) and higher body mass index (BMI) (23.5 ± 4.3 vs 25.8 ± 4.9 kg/m(2), p = 0.006) had a higher risk of conversion. Multivariate analysis finally showed that factors significantly related to the conversion were the presence of comorbidities (p = 0.029), the presence of an appendiceal perforation (p = 0.003), a retrocecal appendix (p = 0.004), the presence of appendicular abscess (p = 0.023) and the presence of diffuse peritonitis (p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients with acute appendicitis can be successfully managed with laparoscopy. We found that the only preoperative independent factor related to conversion during laparoscopic appendectomy is the presence of comorbidities. Nevertheless surgeons should take into account that presence of peri-appendicular abscess and diffuse peritonitis are both independently related not only to higher rate of conversion but also to higher risk of postoperative complication.

Systematic review of laparoscopic versus open surgery in the treatment of non-parasitic liver cysts.

We conducted a systematic review of the literature on the electronic databases Medline, Embase, Ovid and Cochrane to identify studies from 1990 to 2011 regarding the surgical management of non-parasitic liver cysts treated with laparoscopy (LT) and/or laparotomy (OT) to identify short-term and long-term outcomes of the relative treatments. Two reviewers independently extracted data regarding the following parameters: first author, year of publication, type of journal, study design, number of patients operated on, male/female ratio, mean age, mean size of the cysts treated, laparoscopic conversion rate, morbidity, mortality and recurrence in both groups (LT and OT). A qualitative analysis was carried out using the Pearson Chi square test and the Fischer's exact test where necessary. The data analysis was conducted by dividing the sample into three periods in relation to the development of laparoscopic surgery: period 1 (P1), 1990-1995 "pioneering" period of laparoscopy; period 2 (P2), 1996-2000 period of the "development of laparoscopy"; period 3 (P3), 2001-2011 period of "diffusion of laparoscopy." Thirty studies involving 948 patients comparing LT with OT were included in the final pooled analysis. Twenty-two studies were retrospective (73.3 %) and only 8 (26.7 %) were prospective. The number of publications increased during the three periods analysed. The correlation between the type of journal and the year of publication showed an increase (p = 0.048) in journals dedicated to LT during the three periods. In P1, the preferred approach was open surgery (66.3 %) with only 11 cases treated with LT. The conversion rate was 18.1 %. The overall complication rate was 33.3 % with a substantial equivalence between the two approaches (27.2 % for laparoscopic surgery and 36.6 % for laparotomic). The overall recurrence rate was 18.1 % with 36.3 % in the laparoscopic group and 9.2 % in the laparotomic group. In P2, the preferred approach was laparoscopic (56.7 %). The conversion rate was 2.3 %. The overall complication rate was 5.8 % but with some differences between the two approaches (10.3 % for the laparoscopic approach and 0 % for open surgery). The overall recurrence rate was 14.4 % with 17.4 % in the laparoscopic group and 10.4 % in the laparotomic group. In P3, the preferred approach was laparoscopic (69.9 %). The overall recurrence rate was 11.1 %; it was 6.1 % for the laparoscopic approach while it was 11.5 % for laparotomic. In all three periods analysed, the laparoscopic approach showed a statistically significant reduction in operative time (p = 0.009) and hospital stay (p = 0.001) and a significant (p < 0.05) reduction rate in symptomatic recurrences in patients with polycystic liver disease (25 %) as compared with simple liver cysts (7.5 %). The current data in the literature show that the laparoscopic approach may be the treatment of choice in patients with symptomatic non-parasitic cysts of the liver, providing the short-term advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Recurrence rates were acceptable and comparable to those of conventional surgery. Long-term outcomes should be verified by additional randomised controlled trials and long-term follow-ups.

A bizarre foreign body in the appendix: A case report.

Foreign bodies are rare causes of appendicitis and, in most cases, ingested foreign bodies pass through the alimentary tract asymptomatically. However, ingested foreign bodies may sometimes remain silent within the appendix for many years without an inflammatory response. Despite the fact that cases of foreign-body-induced appendicitis have been documented, sharp and pointed objects are more likely to cause perforations and abscesses, and present more rapidly after ingestion. Various materials, such as needles and drill bits, as well as organic matter, such as seeds, have been implicated as causes of acute appendicitis. Clinical presentation can vary from hours to years. Blunt foreign bodies are more likely to remain dormant for longer periods and cause appendicitis through obstruction of the appendiceal lumen. We herein describe a patient presenting with a foreign body in his appendix which had been swallowed 15 years previously. The contrast between the large size of the foreign body, the long clinical history without symptoms and the total absence of any histological inflammation was notable. We suggest that an elective laparoscopic appendectomy should be offered to such patients as a possible management option.

Asymptomatic cholecystocolonic fistula: a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma.

Cholecystocolonic fistulas (CCF) are rare complications of gallstones with a variable clinical presentation. Despite modern diagnostic tools, cholecystocolonic fistulas are often asymptomatic and it is difficult to diagnose them preoperatively. Biliary-enteric fistulae have been found in 0.9% of patients undergoing biliary tract surgery. The most common site of communication of the fistula is the cholecystoduodenal (70%), followed by the cholecystocolic (10-20%), and the least common is the cholecystogastric fistula. Herein, we report a case of female patient with multiple episodes of acute recurrent cholangitis due to common bile duct and gallbladder stones in which preoperative imaging studies were negative for cholecystocolonic fistula that was incidentally discovered and treated during surgery and was appropriately treated. A review of the literature is reported too.

The NOTA study: non-operative treatment for acute appendicitis: prospective study on the efficacy and safety of antibiotic treatment (amoxicillin and clavulanic acid) in patients with right sided lower abdominal pain.

BACKGROUND: Case control studies that randomly assign patients with diagnosis of acute appendicitis to either surgical or non-surgical treatment yield a relapse rate of approximately 14% at one year. It would be useful to know the relapse rate of patients who have, instead, been selected for a given treatment based on a thorough clinical evaluation, including physical examination and laboratory results (Alvarado Score) as well as radiological exams if needed or deemed helpful. If this clinical evaluation is useful, the investigators would expect patient selection to be better than chance, and relapse rate to be lower than 14%. Once the investigators have established the utility of this evaluation, the investigators can begin to identify those components that have predictive value (such as blood analysis, or US/CT findings). This is the first step toward developing an accurate diagnostic-therapeutic algorithm which will avoid risks and costs of needless surgery. METHODS/DESIGN: This will be a single-cohort prospective observational study. It will not interfere with the usual pathway, consisting of clinical examination in the Emergency Department (ED) and execution of the following exams at the physician's discretion: full blood count with differential, C reactive protein, abdominal ultrasound, abdominal CT. Patients admitted to an ED with lower abdominal pain and suspicion of acute appendicitis and not needing immediate surgery, are requested by informed consent to undergo observation and non operative treatment with antibiotic therapy (Amoxicillin and Clavulanic Acid). The patients by protocol should not have received any previous antibiotic treatment during the same clinical episode. Patients not undergoing surgery will be physically examined 5 days later. Further follow-up will be conducted at 7, 15 days, 6 months and 12 months. The study will conform to clinical practice guidelines and will follow the recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved on November 2009 by Maggiore Hospital Ethical Review Board (ID CE09079). Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01096927.

Management and outcome of 308 cases of liver trauma in Bologna Trauma Center in 10 years.

INTRODUCTION: Management of Liver Trauma may vary widely from NOM +/- angioembolization to Damage Control Surgery. Multidisciplinary management is essential for achieving better outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During 2000-2009 period 308 patients with liver injury were admitted to level 1 trauma center and recorded in Trauma Registry. Collected data are demographics, AAST grade, initial treatment (operative or non-operative treatment) and outcome (failure of NOM), death. All patients were initially assessed according to ATLS guidelines. In case of haemodynamic instability and FAST evidence of intra-abdominal free fluid, the patients underwent immediate laparotomy. Hemodynamically stable patients, underwent CT scan and were admitted in ICU for NOM. RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen patients (69.5%) were initially managed with NOM. In 185 patients this was successful. Within the other 29 patients, failure of NOM was due to liver-related causes in 12 patients and non-liver-related causes in 17 Greater the grade of liver injury, fewer patients could be enrolled for NOM (85.8% in I-II and 83.3% in III against 39.8% in IV-V). Of those initially treated non-operatively, the likelihood of failure was greater in more severely injured patients (24.4% liver-related failure rate in IV-V against the 1.3% and 1.0% in I-II and III respectively). One hundred twenty-three patients (40% of the whole population study--308 patients) underwent laparotomy: 94 immediately after admission, because no eligible for NOM; 29 after NOM failure . In the 81 patients in which liver bleeding was still going on at laparotomy, hemostasis was attempted in two different ways: in the patients affected by hypothermia, coagulopathy and acidosis, perihepatic packing was the treatment of choice. In the other cases a "direct repair" technique was preferred. "Early mortality" which was expected to be worse in patients with such metabolic derangements, was surprisingly the same of the other group. This proves efficacy of the packing technique in interrupting the "vicious cicle" of hypothermia, coagulopathy and acidosis, therefore avoiding death ("early death" in particular) from uncontrollable bleeding. CONCLUSION: NOM +/- angioembolization is safe and effective in any grade of liver injury provided hemodynamic stability. DCS is Gold Standard for hemodynamically unstable patients.

Dyspnea and large bowel obstruction: a misleading Chilaiditi syndrome.

Chilaiditi sign is named after the Greek radiologist Demetrius Chilaiditi who first described it when he was working in Vienna In (1910), and it is an incidental radiographic finding. This sign can be more frequently mistaken for pneumoperitoneum which is usually an indication of bowel perforation and can lead to needless surgical intervention. There are several case report reported in literature that describe the association between colonic volvulus and Chilaiditi syndrome that underline the frequent association between these anatomical condition instead no previous report described the association between Chilaiditi syndrome and large bowel obstruction secondary to a malignant sigmoid stenosis in a man presenting with symptoms and signs of upper respiratory distress combined with subacute bowel obstruction.

Prognosis and treatment of pancreaticoduodenal traumatic injuries: which factors are predictors of outcome?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Abdominal trauma rarely causes injuries involving the duodenum and pancreas. Associated injuries occur in 46% of all pancreatic injuries. The morbidity and mortality of pancreaticoduodenal injuries remain high. METHODS: The present study is a retrospective review of our experience from 1989 to 2008 in the surgical treatment of traumatic pancreaticoduodenal injuries. Mortality, morbidity, prognostic factors, and the value of surgical techniques were analyzed. RESULTS: In our level I Trauma Center, between 1989 and 2008, 55 patients had a pancreaticoduodenal injury. In 68.5% of cases pancreatic injuries were found, 20.4% had duodenal injury, and 11.1% suffered combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries; 85.3% of the patients had blunt abdominal trauma, while 14.9% had penetrating injuries. We treated 78.1% of the patients with external drainage and/or simple suture; distal pancreatectomy was performed in 9% of cases and duodenal resection with anastomosis (3.7%) and diversion procedures (3.7%) were performed in an equal number of patients. Age, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade, organ involved, hemodynamic status, intraoperative cardiac arrest, and operative time remained strongly predictive of mortality on multivariate analysis. The AAST grade represented, on multivariate analysis, the only independent prognostic factor predictive of overall morbidity. In the past decade we have used feeding jejunostomy more frequently, with a reduction of mortality and operating time, due also to a better approach from a dedicated trauma team. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal management and better outcome of pancreaticoduodenal injuries seem to be associated with shorter operative time, and with simple and fast damage control surgery (DCS), in contrast to definitive surgical procedures.

Refinement in the technique of perihepatic packing: a safe and effective surgical hemostasis and multidisciplinary approach can improve the outcome in severe liver trauma.

BACKGROUND: since 2005, we refined the technique of perihepatic packing including complete mobilization of the right lobe and packing around the posterior paracaval surface, lateral right side, and anterior and posteroinferior surfaces. METHODS: two groups of patients with grade IV/V liver trauma underwent perihepatic packing before and after 2005. The study group included 12 patients treated with the new technique. The control group included 23 patients treated with the old technique. RESULTS: all 13 patients except one who died within 24 hours were treated with the old technique. The overall survival rate was 75% in the patients treated with the new technique (vs 30.4%, P < .02); the liver-related mortality was 8.3% versus 34.8% (P = not significant). The mean survival time in the intensive care unit was longer in the latest group (39.4 vs 22.3 days, P = not significant). The incidence of rebleeding requiring repacking was 16.7% in the patients who underwent new packing versus 45.5% in the patient who were treated with the old technique (P = not significant). The overall (81.8% vs 100%, P = not significant) and liver-related morbidity rate (18.2% vs 41.7%, P = not significant) and the incidence of abdominal sepsis (9.1% vs 41.7%, P = not significant) decreased. CONCLUSIONS: our refined technique of perihepatic packing seems to be safe and effective.

Diverticulum of the midthoracic oesophagus and left diaphragmatic relaxation.

The case of a 58-year-old man with a large midthoracic oesophageal diverticulum and a left diaphragmatic relaxation who presented with night regurgitations, abdominal bloating, epigastric burning and a sensation of fullness after meals is reported. The patient underwent a successful thoracotomic diverticulectomy with left diaphragmatic plicature. The postoperative course was uneventful. To our knowledge this is the first reported case of an association between midthoracic oesophageal diverticulum and left diaphragmatic relaxation. Moreover, we hypothesised that the diverticulum was caused by a pulsion mechanism due to obstruction of the distal oesophagus secondary to diaphragmatic relaxation.

Value of both WHO and TNM classification systems for patients with pancreatic endocrine tumors: results of a single-center series.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the clinical relevance of the World Health Organization (WHO) and tumor node metastasis (TNM) classifications in patients affected by pancreatic endocrine tumors. METHODS: Data from 76 consecutive patients with pancreatic endocrine tumors who underwent surgery were analyzed. RESULTS: Well-differentiated tumors were observed more frequently (57.9%) than well or poorly differentiated carcinomas (26.3% and 15.8%, respectively). The TNM stage was I in 27.6%, II in 39.5%, III in 19.7%, and IV in 13.2%. Univariate analysis of disease-specific survival showed that patients with stages I-II had a significantly better survival rate than those with stages III-IV (hazard ratio (HR), 12.46; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.53-101.32; P = 0.018; HR, 25.74; 95% CI, 3.07-216.07; P = 0.003, respectively). Regarding the WHO classification, poorly differentiated carcinomas had the worst prognosis (HR, 79.13; 95% CI, 9.99-626.60; P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis of disease-specific survival showed that the WHO classification is the only independent factors of improved survival: both poorly and well-differentiated carcinomas had an increased risk of death compared with WDTs (HR, 100.42; 95% CI, 12.16-829.40; P < 0.001; HR, 10.73; 95% CI, 1.12-104.17; P = 0.040, respectively). TNM classification and the WHO system are highly correlated (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TNM stage and the WHO classification seems to be equally reliable, even if TNM classification tends to understage the patients classified using the WHO system.

Reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: isolated Roux loop pancreatic anastomosis.

Pancreatic fistula is the most frequent major complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Its rate may be related to several risk factors, among which pancreatic anastomotic reconstruction techniques. The study reported here was a prospective, non-randomized study of 38 consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from March 2006 to February 2007. Two groups were studied according to the type of treatment of the pancreatic remnant: group 1 (n = 18) in which an isolated Roux loop Wirsung-jejunal end-to-side anastomosis was performed; and group 2 (n = 20) in which a pancreaticojejunostomy was carried out in the same jejunal loop as the biliary and gastric anastomosis. The two groups of patients were compared regarding preoperative characteristics, surgical procedure and postoperative outcome. Postoperative mortality, morbidity and pancreatic fistula in all the patients in the two groups were evaluated in relation to several risk factors. The overall postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 2.6% (1/38 cases) and 26.3% (10/38 cases), respectively. The pancreatic fistula rate was 13.1% (5 cases). There were no significant differences in postoperative outcome between the two groups. However, both mean and median postoperative postoperative hospital stay were shorter in group 1 than in group 2 (P < 0.001). Postoperative pancreatic fistula was not significantly more frequent in relation to any of the different risk factors. The isolated Roux loop Wirsung-jejunal end-to-side anastomosis after PD is safe, easy to perform and allows the same results of pancreaticojejunostomy in the same jejunal loop of the biliary and gastric anastomosis. Moreover the isolated Roux loop reconstruction allows a significant decrease of the length of postoperative hospital stay.

Thrombosed splenic artery aneurysm simulating a pancreatic body mass: can two entities be distinguished preoperatively thus avoiding diagnostic and therapeutic mistakes?

CONTEXT: Splenic artery aneurysms are rare and they are usually easy to diagnose. Spiral computed tomography is the most sensitive diagnostic technique for this disease. Its primary treatment is interventional radiology; surgery is indicated in selected cases. CASE REPORT: We herein report a case of an elderly male patient with a completely thrombosed aneurysm of the splenic artery. The spiral computed tomography and color-Doppler ultrasonography findings were different; the first showed this entity to be a pancreatic solid tumor and the second showed it to be an aneurysmatic thrombosed dilation of the splenic artery. Thus, laparotomy was performed and the proper diagnosis was made. CONCLUSIONS: This case underlines the characteristics of completely thrombosed splenic artery aneurysm with the aim to avoid diagnostic and therapeutic mistakes.