Assessing the impact of health literacy on education retention of stroke patients.

INTRODUCTION: Inadequate health literacy is a pervasive problem with major implications for reduced health status and health disparities. Despite the role of focused education in both primary and secondary prevention of stroke, the effect of health literacy on stroke education retention has not been reported. We examined the relationship of health literacy to the retention of knowledge after recommended stroke education. METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at an urban safety-net hospital. Study subjects were patients older than 18 admitted to the hospital stroke unit with a diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke who were able to provide informed consent to participate (N = 100). Health literacy levels were measured by using the short form of Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults. Patient education was provided to patients at an inpatient stroke unit by using standardized protocols, in compliance with Joint Commission specifications. The education outcomes for poststroke care education, knowledge retention, was assessed for each subject. The effect of health literacy on the Stroke Patient Education Retention scores was assessed by using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of the 100 participating patients, 59% had inadequate to marginal health literacy. Stroke patients who had marginal health literacy (mean score, 7.45; standard deviation [SD], 1.9) or adequate health literacy (mean score, 7.31; SD, 1.76) had statistically higher education outcome scores than those identified as having inadequate health literacy (mean score, 5.58; SD, 2.06). Results from multivariate analysis indicated that adequate health literacy was most predictive of education outcome retention. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a clear relationship between health literacy and stroke education outcomes. Studies are needed to better understand the relationship of health literacy to key educational outcomes for primary or secondary prevention of stroke and to refine stroke education for literacy levels of high-risk populations.

Combined thalamic ptosis and astasia.

Isolated cases of astasia or ptosis have each been reported in ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes involving the thalamus. We report a 70-year-old man with a medical history of hypertension who presented with left ptosis and gait disturbance despite intact motor strength in the legs and normal sensory function. MRI of the brain showed an evolving subacute infarction confined to the anteromedial-medial part of the left thalamus with no other areas of recent infarction identified. To our knowledge, combined ptosis and astasia in thalamic infarction has not been reported in the English literature. We identified 11 patients with thalamic ptosis and 21 with thalamic astasia in the literature. Patients who had ptosis, or gait abnormality which would not be related to thalamic stroke, were excluded; for example, evidence of infarction in the hypothalamus, midbrain, pons, cerebellum, or cingulate gyrus.

Cogan syndrome: an analysis of reported neurological manifestations.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Cogan syndrome typically present with nonsyphilitic interstitial keratitis and acute onset of sensorineural hearing loss. Neurological manifestations have been reported, but various frequencies and mechanisms have been proposed. REVIEW SUMMARY: We critically reviewed the English literature of Cogan syndrome to determine the nature, frequency, and most likely mechanisms of its neurological manifestations. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our review, we believe that Cogan syndrome can be associated with neurological manifestations. Our conclusion is based on reported tissue evidence of vasculitis involving the dura, brain, optic nerve, cochleovestibular nerve, and muscle, in patients with referable symptoms. However, we believe that the frequency of neurological manifestations may have been over reported due to lack of confirmatory testing in many of these cases.

Analysis of a physician tool for evaluating dysphagia on an inpatient stroke unit: the modified Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability.

BACKGROUND: Although many dysphagia screening protocols have been introduced in recent years, no validated, physician-administered dysphagia screening tool exists for acute stroke that can be performed at the bedside. Based on the psychometrically validated Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA), we developed the Modified MASA (MMASA) as a physician-administered screening tool for dysphagia in acute stroke. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to complete initial validation of this new screening tool for dysphagia in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: Two stroke neurologists independently performed the MMASA on 150 patients with ischemic stroke. Speech-language pathologists performed the standard MASA on all patients. All examiners were blinded to the results of the other assessments. Interjudge reliability was evaluated between the neurologists. Validity between the screening tool (MMASA) and the clinical evaluation (MASA) was assessed with sensitivity/specificity and predictive value assessment. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement between the neurologists using the MMASA was good (k=0.76; SE=0.082). Based on the comprehensive clinical evaluation (MASA), 36.2% of patients demonstrated dysphagia. Screening results from the neurologists (N1 and N2) identified 38% and 36.7% prevalence of dysphagia, respectively. Sensitivity (N1: 92%, N2: 87%), specificity (N1: 86.3%, N2: 84.2%), positive predictive value (N1: 79.4%, N2: 75.8%), and negative predictive value (N1: 95.3%, N2: 92%) were high between the screen and the comprehensive clinical evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study suggests that the MMASA is a potentially valid and reliable physician-administered screening tool for dysphagia in acute ischemic stroke. Use of this tool may facilitate earlier identification of dysphagia in patients with stroke prompting more rapid comprehensive evaluation and intervention.

Hypertriglyceridemia and ischemic stroke.

There are no conclusive data regarding the association between dyslipidemia and the risk of ischemic stroke (IS). Clinical investigations have primarily focused on the association between elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol as stroke risk factors. Much less scientific attention has been aimed at elevated levels of triglycerides. Consequently the potential role of hypertriglyceridemia as an independent risk factor for IS remains controversial. However, accumulating evidence has shown that hypertriglyceridemia is associated with pathophysiological processes such as endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis and the production of a prothrombotic state, which could contribute to IS risk. The aim of this review is to critically analyze the contribution of hypertriglyceridemia to the occurrence of IS.

Dysphagia and nutritional status at the time of hospital admission for ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Dysphagia and poor nutritional status occur frequently after stroke; however, potential associations between them are unknown. We evaluated potential associations between dysphagia and poor nutritional status in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Potential associations between these outcomes and more global stroke severity measures were also assessed. METHODS: In all, 76 patients with acute ischemic stroke were recruited on admission to the dedicated stroke department of an academic medical center. All patients were assessed with a clinical swallowing evaluation, Functional Oral Intake Scale, Mini Nutritional Assessment, body mass index, percent body fat, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, modified Rankin Scale, and modified Barthel Index. Associations were evaluated among dysphagia, nutrition, and stroke severity measures. RESULTS: On clinical examination 52.6% of study patients demonstrated dysphagia and 26.3% were identified with poor nutritional status. Dysphagia, based on clinical assessment, was associated with stroke severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, odds ratio [OR] 4.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-13.1; modified Rankin Scale, OR 12.3, 95% CI 3.2-47.4) and with functional oral intake (OR 29.2, 95% CI 8.4-101.8), but not with measures of nutritional status (Mini Nutritional Assessment, OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.4-2.8). Nutritional measures did not correlate with swallowing or stroke severity measures. CONCLUSIONS: Dysphagia and poor nutritional status are prevalent in patients with acute ischemic stroke, however, they are not associated with each other at the time of hospital admission. Furthermore, dysphagia, but not nutritional status, is associated with stroke severity measures.