Radiomics in PET/CT: Current Status and Future AI-Based Evolutions.

This short review aims at providing the readers with an update on the current status, as well as future perspectives in the quickly evolving field of radiomics applied to the field of PET/CT imaging. Numerous pitfalls have been identified in study design, data acquisition, segmentation, features calculation and modeling by the radiomics community, and these are often the same issues across all image modalities and clinical applications, however some of these are specific to PET/CT (and SPECT/CT) imaging and therefore the present paper focuses on those. In most cases, recommendations and potential methodological solutions do exist and should therefore be followed to improve the overall quality and reproducibility of published studies. In terms of future evolutions, the techniques from the larger field of artificial intelligence (AI), including those relying on deep neural networks (also known as deep learning) have already shown impressive potential to provide solutions, especially in terms of automation, but also to maybe fully replace the tools the radiomics community has been using until now in order to build the usual radiomics workflow. Some important challenges remain to be addressed before the full impact of AI may be realized but overall the field has made striking advances over the last few years and it is expected advances will continue at a rapid pace.

Can alternative PET reconstruction schemes improve the prognostic value of radiomic features in non-small cell lung cancer?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential benefit of using alternative reconstruction schemes of PET images for the prognostic value of radiomic features. METHODS: Patients (n=91) with non-small cell lung cancer were prospectively included. All had a PET/CT examination before treatment. Three different PET images were reconstructed for each patient: the standard clinical protocol (i.e., 4×4×4 mm3 voxels, 5mm Gaussian filter, denoted '200G5'), as well as using smaller voxels (i.e., 2×2×2 mm3 with a larger reconstruction matrix, denoted 400G1) and/or 1mm post-reconstruction Gaussian filter, denoted 200G1). Metabolic volumes of the primary tumors were semi-automatically delineated on the PET images and IBSI compliant radiomic features (intensity, shape, textural) were extracted. First, the distributions of 200G1 and 400G1 features were compared to the reference clinical protocol (200G5) through Bland-Altman tests and the use of linear mixed models. Then, the prognostic value of the features from each of the 3 reconstructions was evaluated in a univariate analysis, through their stratification power in Kaplan-Meier curves through a threshold set at the median. RESULTS: The 3 reconstructions led to different distributions for most of the features. The larger shifts and standard deviations of differences was observed between 200G5 and 400G1, which was also confirmed through linear mixed models. However, these relatively important differences in distributions did not translate into a significant impact on the stratification power of the features in terms of prognosis, although a trend in decreasing prognostic value could be observed (smaller number of features with HR above 2, overall lower HR values). Most prognostic features displayed high correlation with either volume or SUVmax, although there was great variability of prognostic value for similar levels of correlation with these basic metrics. CONCLUSIONS: Using smaller voxels or less strong filtering options in the reconstruction settings of PET images compared to the standard clinical protocols led to different distributions of the resulting radiomic features. However, the hierarchy between patients according to these distributions remained overall the same and therefore the resulting stratification power of the radiomic features was not significantly altered. These results should be compared to those obtained in the context of other pathologies where radiomic features displaying lower correlation with volume or SUVmax may have predictive value, such as in cervical cancer.