The effect of various forms of selenium supplied to pregnant goats on the levels of selenium in the body of their kids at the time of weaning.

The aim of this trial was to compare the effect of long-term supplementation of goats with different forms of selenium on body reserves of selenium in their kids at the time of weaning. Thirty-three pregnant goats were divided into five groups. Group C was control while the other four groups were supplemented with selenium (Se) for 6 weeks before parturition (0.3 mg/goat/day) and after parturition (0.9 mg/goat/day). Group "Se-I" received sodium selenite and three other groups received organic forms: "Se-L," lactate-protein complex; "Se-P," Se-proteinate; and "Se-Y," Se-yeast. The kids were weaned at 3 months of age and samples of tissues (liver, pancreas, myocardium, lungs, kidneys, spleen, thigh, tongue, and diaphragm) were taken after slaughtering. The long-term supplementation of goats with Se influenced Se concentration in all examined tissues of kids. Significant differences (p≤0.01) were found between the control and all experimental groups, except for the renal cortex and pancreas (Se-I). The average increase of Se concentration in overall examined tissues in comparison with the control (100%) was as follows: Se-Y, 192%; Se-P, 167%; Se-L, 161%; Se-I, 144%. The highest efficiency was found in the group supplemented with Se-yeast with a high content of selenomethionine, also the other two organic forms of Se were more efficient than the inorganic form.

Esomeprazole-based 1-week triple therapy directed by susceptibility testing for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in children.

BACKGROUND: Poor compliance to therapy and antibiotic resistance are the main causes for failure of anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of esomeprazole-based triple therapy directed by susceptibility testing. METHODS: Symptomatic children with H. pylori infection, who underwent successful susceptibility testing and were colonized by no double-resistant strain, received 1-week triple therapy with esomeprazole, amoxicillin and either clarithromycin or metronidazole. Success of eradication was investigated by C-urea breath test. RESULTS: Fifty-eight children (median age, 11.4 years; range, 2.2-17.7 years; 81% immigrants) were included. Helicobacter pylori was resistant to clarithromycin in 5 (9%) and to metronidazole in 9 children (16%). Eradication was successful in 49 (92%) of 53 children receiving esomeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin and in all 5 children treated with metronidazole instead of clarithromycin, resulting in an eradication rate of 93% (95% confidence interval, 83%-98%, intention-to-treat analysis). All 4 treatment failures occurred in immigrants with language problems; 2 of them were obviously noncompliant. CONCLUSION: Esomeprazole-based 1-week triple therapy directed by susceptibility testing is highly effective for eradication of H. pylori infection in children.

7-day triple therapy of Helicobacter pylori infection with levofloxacin, amoxicillin, and high-dose esomeprazole in patients with known antimicrobial sensitivity.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Failed primary anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy results in a high rate of antimicrobial resistance. This necessitates a search for new regimens to cure H. pylori infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new levofloxacin-containing 7-day triple therapy and to compare it with that of standard French triple therapy in patients with known H. pylori susceptibility to MET (metronidazole) and CLA (clarithromycin). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients with documented antibiotic sensitivity (E-test) and an indication for anti-H. pylori treatment based on the Maastricht Consensus 2/2000 guidelines were randomized to receive either esomeprazole 2 x 40 mg, levofloxacin 2 x 500 mg, and amoxicillin 2 x 1 g for 7 days (ELA, n = 30), or esomeprazole 2 x 20 mg, clarithromycin 2 x 500 mg, and amoxicillin 2 x 1 g for 7 days (ECA, n = 31). A cure check was performed 4-6 weeks after conclusion of therapy. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were randomized to the two treatment groups. Twenty-eight of 30 patients of the ELA group were available for per-protocol (PP) analysis, of whom 26 (92.9% CI: 76-99%; intention-to-treat [ITT] analysis 86.7% CI: 68-96%) became H. pylori negative compared with 26 of the 31 patients of the ECA group (83.9%, CI: 66-93% both PP and ITT analyses). Five patients of the ELA group showed CLA resistance, three of whom also showed MET resistance, and all five were treated successfully. Two patients with levofloxacin-resistant strains, one in each group, were cured. Both regimens were generally well tolerated with minor adverse events being seen in 15 patients (51.7%) of the ELA group and in 13 (40.6%) of the ECA group. None of the patients discontinued treatment prematurely due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: The data of this pilot study suggest a better than 80% efficacy of the new 7-day levofloxacin triple therapy, which is within the range of the French triple therapy in patients with MET- and CLA-susceptible strains. The data suggest that the new levofloxacin triple therapy may also be an option in patients with MET- and CLA-resistant H. pylori strains.

Evaluation of a novel rapid one-step immunochromatographic assay for detection of monoclonal Helicobacter pylori antigen in stool samples from children.

A new rapid one-step immunochromatographic test using monoclonal antibodies for detection of Helicobacter pylori antigen in stool in children was evaluated on coded stool samples from 159 children (mean age, 9.7 +/- 5.0 years; 118 from Munich, 41 from Vienna): 86 children were H. pylori infected defined by positive culture and/or > or =2 other positive tests ([13C]urea breath test, histology, rapid urease test), and 73 children showed concordant negative results. Seventy-nine patients (12.1 +/- 3.8 years; 42 from Munich; 37 from Vienna) were tested 6 to 8 weeks after anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy with urea breath test and stool test. In Munich, all 160 tests (118 pre- and 42 posttreatment) were independently read by two observers. Equivocal results were excluded for calculation of sensitivity and specificity but were considered as false to assess accuracy. The two observers in Munich agreed in 63 out of 65 positive and 89 out of 95 negative results, while eight times (5.0%) they judged the test as equivocal. Pretreatment and posttreatment results for sensitivity were 88.1% (79.2 to 94.1) and 88.9% (51.8 to 99.7), specificity 88.1% (77.8 to 94.1) and 93.9% (85.2 to 98.3), and accuracy 83.5% and 81.5%, respectively. We conclude that the new monoclonal immunochromatographic quick test shows a good interobserver agreement, but equivocal results occur in 5%. Performance is comparable before and after therapy. The test may become a good alternative in children in settings where a [13C]urea breath test or a reliable enzyme immunoassay stool test are not available.

Long-term follow-up after complete ablation of Barrett's esophagus with argon plasma coagulation.

AIM: To report the long-term outcome of patients after complete ablation of non-neoplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE) with respect to BE relapse and development of intraepithelial neoplasia or esophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: In 70 patients with histologically proven non-neoplastic BE, complete BE ablation was achieved by argon plasma coagulation (APC) and high-dose proton pump inhibitor therapy (120 mg omeprazole daily). Sixty-six patients (94.4%) underwent further surveillance endoscopy. At each surveillance endoscopy four-quadrant biopsies were taken from the neo-squamous epithelium at 2 cm intervals depending on the pre-treatment length of BE mucosa beginning at the neo-Z-line, and from any endoscopically suspicious lesion. RESULTS: The median follow-up of 66 patients was 51 mo (range 9-85 mo) giving a total of 280.5 patient years. A mean of 6 biopsies were taken during surveillance endoscopies. In 13 patients (19.7%) tongues or islands suspicious for BE were found during endoscopy. In 8 of these patients (12.1%) non-neoplastic BE relapse was confirmed histologically giving a histological relapse rate of 3% per year. In none of the patients, intraepithelial neoplasia nor an esophageal adenocarcinoma was detected. Logistic regression analysis identified endoscopic detection of islands or tongues as the only positive predictor of BE relapse (P = 0.0004). CONCLUSION: The long-term relapse rate of non-neoplastic BE following complete ablation with high-power APC is low (3% per year).